Jump to content

Do you think Norby can be an everyday MLB player?


kidrock

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

“This system isn’t that deep past 3 top ~15 prospects and 2 borderline top 100 prospects”

We’ve been spoiled by having a tremendous farm system the past few years, and have graduated by far the best young core of position players in baseball, without even counting those additional blue chip guys in Holliday, Mayo and Basallo. The system now looks more normal to above average than ludicrously strong.

There are plenty of interesting guys who could emerge but are not high probability prospects, and that’s what nearly all farm systems look like once you get past their top 5 prospects.

Once Holliday and Mayo graduate, it’s not likely to be a top 5 overall farm system anymore. But I expect it will still be in the 5-15 range. 

Yes, I thought about that when I posted it, but people think we have this endless supply of prospects. If we trade Norby and Stowers away because they’re spare parts, then one of Mayo/Basallo for Mason Miller, then our system is just Holliday, Kjerstad, EBJ, and one of Mayo/Bassalo. All of that without having picks in early rd 1. 

We’ve hit on a lot of picks, but still have struggling picks/money spent on Trimble, Rhodes, Wagner, Horvath, Fabian, and Carter Young. The draft is no guarantee. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Yes, I thought about that when I posted it, but people think we have this endless supply of prospects. If we trade Norby and Stowers away because they’re spare parts, then one of Mayo/Basallo for Mason Miller, then our system is just Holliday, Kjerstad, EBJ, and one of Mayo/Bassalo. All of that without having picks in early rd 1. 

We’ve hit on a lot of picks, but still have struggling picks/money spent on Trimble, Rhodes, Wagner, Horvath, Fabian, and Carter Young. The draft is no guarantee. 

Agreed, and it's going to get much more difficult now that we aren't picking 1/1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Yes, I thought about that when I posted it, but people think we have this endless supply of prospects. If we trade Norby and Stowers away because they’re spare parts, then one of Mayo/Basallo for Mason Miller, then our system is just Holliday, Kjerstad, EBJ, and one of Mayo/Bassalo. All of that without having picks in early rd 1. 

We’ve hit on a lot of picks, but still have struggling picks/money spent on Trimble, Rhodes, Wagner, Horvath, Fabian, and Carter Young. The draft is no guarantee. 

Yeah, I agree that we don’t have an endless supply of top prospects and can’t really afford to trade any of Mayo/Basallo/Kjerstad for anything other than a top SP with many years of control. If Mason Miller didn’t have the huge injury question marks he might be around that value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Yes, I thought about that when I posted it, but people think we have this endless supply of prospects. If we trade Norby and Stowers away because they’re spare parts, then one of Mayo/Basallo for Mason Miller, then our system is just Holliday, Kjerstad, EBJ, and one of Mayo/Bassalo. All of that without having picks in early rd 1. 

We’ve hit on a lot of picks, but still have struggling picks/money spent on Trimble, Rhodes, Wagner, Horvath, Fabian, and Carter Young. The draft is no guarantee. 

Padres always seem to have four to five guys they can trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in Baltimore. 

He's a smaller, pull hitter with moderate power.  That won't play well in Camden Yards. 

I think he has the potential to be an everyday player for a team with kinder dimensions in left, and ideally playing LF rather than 2B.   But more likely that he ends up a platoon or bench guy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Norby projects to be about league average offensively. His AAA numbers look very good, but adjusting for the high level of offense at the AAA level means he’s not that far above AAA league average.

An average-ish AAA hitter doesn't project to be an average-ish MLB player unless he's very young. Norby will soon turn 24. The projection systems at Fangraphs all say he's a high .600s OPS hitter in the majors.

So without additional growth as a hitter, to be a MLB starter he's going to have to provide additional value, either with his glove or his positional flexibility.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kidrock said:

Does he have the defense?

After adjusting his numbers down (from triple a to MLB), do you think he can hang on full time?  I really like him, but don’t know enough about projecting players.  Thanks for the wisdom.

No poll?

 

I do!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

If he can be a 780+ OPS guy, teams will find somewhere for him to play..so I say yes, assuming he hits.

Can you elaborate more on why you think roughly 780 OPS is the right mark?  Not disagreeing, just want to hear your thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kidrock said:

Can you elaborate more on why you think roughly 780 OPS is the right mark?  Not disagreeing, just want to hear your thoughts.

Also - what does a normal OPS at Second or Left Field look like these days?  Seems like offense is down a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, kidrock said:

Can you elaborate more on why you think roughly 780 OPS is the right mark?  Not disagreeing, just want to hear your thoughts.

Just a number I’m throwing out but his OPs is going to have to be a little higher to offset the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a 2nd or 3rd division non-contending team, sure Norby could start at an corner OF position or 2B. It doesn't seem like he has much trade value to those teams however. On a contending team it gets dicier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...