Jump to content

The 2024 Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

Just now, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I like Kjerstad, but if the A’s were fine with that proposal I’m making the trade. I can’t see the A’s agreeing without a pitcher added to that package. 

I'd say there is no chance the A's take that package, even with one of our pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Malike said:

MLBN is trash lol. Oakland would hang up so fast.

image.thumb.png.8316f28341d9655eba9a8434be594d06.png

Actually makes some sense vs. the ones suggesting Mayo or Basallo.  Why Oakland would trade Miller for a defensively limited corner OF/1B, I don't know.  They're like 3 years ago from having a new home.  I would want a big package with lots of prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about a trade for Kirby Yates, the closer for the Rangers.  He's on a 1 year/ $4.5 mill deal, so the price wouldn't be exorbitant.  He's having a great season, 0.92 ERA, w/ a 0.92 WHIP and 1.79 FIP.  His 2 pitches are a 4 seam fastball and a splitter.  I have to admit I'm not familiar with him.  Good fit for the O's?

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Greg Pappas said:

As of today, would you trade Kjerstad for any of these three pitchers?

  • *Garrett Crochet (25) White Sox (2.5 seasons) 
  • Mason Miller (25) A's (5.5 seasons)
  • *Tarik Skubal (27) Tigers (2.5 seasons)

Is there a realistically available pitcher not listed that you'd deal Kjerstad for?

All of them  although it would depend on what else is in the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

If that’s the best deal they are offered and they say no, they are morons.

They are a team that isn't close to contention and have no idea where they are going to end up and when. If they want a 25 year old top 20 prospect and 26 year old AAAA guy for Miller that might make them the morons.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Greg Pappas said:

As of today, would you trade Kjerstad for any of these three pitchers?

  • *Garrett Crochet (25) White Sox (2.5 seasons) 
  • Mason Miller (25) A's (5.5 seasons)
  • *Tarik Skubal (27) Tigers (2.5 seasons)

Is there a realistically available pitcher not listed that you'd deal Kjerstad for?

Yes to Crochet, absolutely not for Miller, yes to Skubal.

Skubal will require a haul, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

What about a trade for Kirby Yates, the closer for the Rangers.  He's on a 1 year/ $4.5 mill deal, so the price wouldn't be exorbitant.  He's having a great season, 0.92 ERA, w/ a 0.92 WHIP and 1.79 FIP.  His 2 pitches are a 4 seam fastball and a splitter.  I have to admit I'm not familiar with him.  Good fit for the O's?

100% in on Kirby. Wouldn’t require much on the prospect front. And has some track record. 
That’ll require the Rangers to throw in the towel. Not sure they’re there, yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Malike said:

They are a team that isn't close to contention and have no idea where they are going to end up and when. If they want a 25 year old top 20 prospect and 26 year old AAAA guy for Miller that might make them the morons.

 Your complete mischaracterization of Os players aside, Miller is likely nothing more than a 60-70 IP reliever with high arm injury potential. (Note: when I say nothing more, I mean that as I don’t think they convert him to a starter next year or even if they do, I think he’s a ticking time bomb)

I don’t care how old Kjerstad is, he’s a high end prospect that you control for 6 years and Stowers is an everyday OFer with big power potential.

Sure, in a perfect world you get younger talent and if so, that’s fine..but if they got offered that and that was the best deal on the table, they should make the deal.

FWIW, I think that deal would get beaten or they would get someone that maybe isn’t ranked as high as Kjerstad but someone younger and maybe more all around upside even if they come with a bigger risk.

 

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 Your complete mischaracterization of Os players aside, Miller is likely nothing more than a 60-70 IP reliever with high arm injury potential. (Note: when I say nothing more, I mean that as I don’t think they convert him to a starter next year or even if they do, I think he’s a ticking time bomb)

I don’t care how old Kjerstad is, he’s a high end prospect that you control for 6 years and Stowers is an everyday OFer with big power potential.

Sure, in a perfect world you get younger talent and if so, that’s fine..but if they got offered that and that was the best deal on the table, they should make the deal.

FWIW, I think that deal would get beaten or they would get someone that maybe isn’t ranked as high as Kjerstad but someone younger and maybe more all around upside even if they come with a bigger risk.

 

Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, OnlyOneOriole said:

I actually think that is a pretty even trade...all things considered.

I get the years of control… but I don’t get the high price tags for a relief pitcher with 60 big league innings. I don’t know how that commands the #20 prospect …. Btw looking at MLBs top 100 I don’t see Kjerstad. We only have 3 top 100 and nothing after Mayo at #15.

 

***** Kjerstad must’ve dropped off the prospect list due to service time ****

Edited by Roll Tide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

So the Rays traded Civale with 1 more year of control for fast rising #19 Cleveland organizational prospect in SS Gregory Barrios.

They have a couple 30 something nonclosers in Cleavinger and Kelly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was given three free tix to see them in Durham in '23. They oversold the tix, ie. the seats were not assigned, first come / first serve,  the line to get in was ridiculously long, and we had to stand in the miserable heat and humidity of a NC summer.  Worst baseball in person experience of my life. Just goofy from the little I got to see in the three person deep standing room only crowd. We left after three innings or whatever they call it in their version of the game. Way too loud, too. Just too much BS going on. It was like the baseball version of drinking WAY too much gin and fruit punch and the wild colors give you the bed spins. 
    • This series loss is really tough to get over. As much as I’m not surprised by it, it’s such a disappointment. I keep thinking of that sequence of Ced’s HR and bases loaded, and we somehow couldn’t come away with the lead. That was absolutely demoralizing. It’s hard to not accidentally score a run there.
    • A RH power bat to stick somewhere in the 3-4-5 slots. I would see what the Giants might want in a trade for Heliot Ramos. He hit .370 / .439 / .750 against LH pitchers this year, and would look awesome in the middle of all our lefty batters.  
    • Early in the offseason and my opinions may change, but here are my thoughts at this time. 1st - I'm ready to move on from Mountcastle.  And O'Hearn should only be a platoon option.  I hope we sign someone like a Alonso or Walker who doesn't have massive L/R splits and who can play on a daily basis, regardless of who is on the mound, and make both Ryans expendable, and we trade them for whatever we can get.  Otherwise we probably keep the platoon going, with the Ryan's splitting based on the SP.  Unfortunately Mayo hasn't show anything in the majors to make me think he's ready to be a regular in the lineup yet.  That could change in the spring, but right now we can't plan on him. 2nd - This is Holidays spot to start the season.  We won't be bringing in any competition for this spot.  Holiday didn't earn it by his play, but his pedigree and the money/time invested into him will give him a pretty long leash, for good or bad.  If he falters Westburg may be moved off of 3rd to play here instead. SS - Gunnar is here.  We won't be bringing in any competition for this spot. 3rd - Westburg.  He should hold this spot down unless Holiday struggles, and then he might be moved over the 2nd.  We don't bring in any real competition for this spot. Util - I don't like it, but I expect us to keep both Mateo and Urias, though I'm not 100% sure if we think Mateo will be ready for OD.  If Mateo isn't expected to be ready then I can see us bringing in someone for this role, though I'm not sure who off the top of my head. C - Adley has this spot, though if we are going to continue to keep his load light, we need a GOOD backup.  And after Adleys struggles the 2nd half of the season, I'm even more concerned about the quality of the backup than I was before this year started.  I'm just not sure how many GOOD backups exist, and any of the really good catchers are going to want to start more than they would here.  I'm not sure Basallo is ready for MLB time, and after the struggles with Mayo and Holiday, we surely can't count on him even if he is on the mlb roster.  McCann could come back...I don't love that idea, but I could see it happening. OF - We start with Mullins, Cowser and Kjerstad, don't try to resign Santander unless he take the QO.  I'd LOVE to see us bring in someone good here (Soto would rock, but clearly isn't going to happen) maybe Pederson or Hernandez or something.  Spend a bit of money here and get someone who has a decent bat. So upgrade 1st base with a non-platoon player and bring in a good vet in the OF.  Say goodbye to the Ryans and Santander. Pitching - I'd love to sign a #1 like Burnes or Snell, but I think they get more years and money than we are willing to go.  I can see us being in on a Max Fried or Jack Flahertyt.  Also possible to see some of the lesser guys, the Andrew Heaneys of the world. Bullpen - I expect to see a few journeyman/low level signings.  With the controllable players we traded for this year and what is returning I don't see us signing anyone big for the bullpen.  
    • I think it’s pretty natural for kids to take special notice of the guys with speed who make exciting plays like steals and triples and defensive “web gems.” Seems like the kids now are higher on guys like Mateo and Mullins than the grownups, and I think that was the case with Brian Roberts back in the day too. As for clutch, in going through some of the clutch numbers, one guy who stood out as a possible fit for us is Alex Bregman. He has a career 144 wRC+ with runners on base and a .294 BA with RISP — I tend to care a little more about BA when a hit scores a run. His postseason heroics are also pretty well-known. Not sure what you’d have to pay him, and I’m pretty sure signing him would necessitate the Holliday-to-CF move. But if they’re not willing to play in the Soto sandbox financially, Bregman would be a veteran guy with championship pedigree and (importantly) ties to Mike/Sig that could put him near the top of their list. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...