Jump to content

Saturday 6/1 vs the Devil Rays with Bradish on the mound.


Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Our pitcher gave up some runs so you have to generalize to this, like it's some characteristic of our team?

When was the last time we had "early inning prosperity" and gave it back?

We are winning 65% of our games and our offense is scoring among the top five  in MLB in runs per game.   Yet we hear so many of these generalized statements about how we can't hit, we can't handle prosperty, we always give runs back after we score, we always do this wrong, we always do that wrong.

It's all such utter BS.   If we were making a habit of doing all the things wrong all the time that the whiners and crybabies constantly cry about, there is NO WAY we would be on a 105 win pace or one of the highest scoring teams in MLB.   It would be impossible.

Do we do those things on occasion?   Sure, every team does.   Every team has a scoring drought   Every team occasionally gets a lead and gives it back.   Every other team strands runners on 3rd with less than two outs now and then.

But there is NO WAY we are worse at all those things than most teams.   There is NO WAY those things can be endemic problems for us rather than just things that happen occasionally to us like every MLB team.  Because if they were, we would not have the record we do.

I agree that some of these things are not fair subjects for criticism or hand-wringing. But it is my impression that the Orioles, for one of the top teams in MLB, rarely get off to a big lead in the first few innings and, when they do, often (again for a very good team) give all or most of it up. 

I don't accept your logic, as I understand it, that because the Orioles have an outstanding won-loss record (just slightly above their simple Pythagorean expectation), they can't be not-so-good at anything.  A very good team can be mediocre or bad at some things. I think the Orioles are not very good at this one, and I said so without researching the accuracy of my observation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, spiritof66 said:

I agree that some of these things are not fair subjects for criticism or hand-wringing. But it is my impression that the Orioles, for one of the top teams in MLB, rarely get off to a big lead in the first few innings and, when they do, often (again for a very good team) give all or most of it up. 

I don't accept your logic, as I understand it, that because the Orioles have an outstanding won-loss record (just slightly above their simple Pythagorean expectation), they can't be not-so-good at anything.  A very good team can be mediocre or bad at some things. I think the Orioles are not very good at this one, and I said so without researching the accuracy of my observation.

I agree we don't get off to a good start offensively this year   That's been documented.   Everyone is a little worse the first time through the order but our split in terms of TTTTO is way bigger than a lot of teams.

But I don't think we "often" give it back at all when we take the lead.  I think we just remember the times when it does happen.

The stats show we get as many sac flies as other teams but every time we fail to get a runner in from 3rd with less than 2 outs there's a chorus of how bad we are at that.   (Of course the chorus has a very well known lead singer).

We got two straight runners in from 3rd with less than two outs the other inning, on a double and a sac fly, but I guarantee the next time we leave someone on 3rd in that situation you'll hear about how bad we are at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...