Jump to content

There is only one reason Wieters should be sent down


BirdMan

Recommended Posts

And that is if they really think he is not ready.

It makes no since to hold him back because of service time. If has is 3/4 as good as everyone thinks he is, we will try to sign him to a long tern lucrative contract before the year is over. His service time concern will never be a factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And that is if they really think he is not ready.

It makes no since to hold him back because of service time. If has is 3/4 as good as everyone thinks he is, we will try to sign him to a long tern lucrative contract before the year is over. His service time concern will never be a factor.

Scott Boras is his agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that is if they really think he is not ready.

It makes no since to hold him back because of service time. If has is 3/4 as good as everyone thinks he is, we will try to sign him to a long tern lucrative contract before the year is over. His service time concern will never be a factor.

Ah. Yes. No one had thought of that before. It's all much clearer now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott Boras is his agent.

We have worked very well with Boras lately. Give him the right contract and he will sign. Boras is going to have to think twice after losing with Many.

"Times they are a changing"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have worked very well with Boras lately. Give him the right contract and he will sign. Boras is going to have to think twice after losing with Many.

"Times they are a changing"

This just really isn't true at all. The chances of Wieters signing an extension this season are basically zero. If Wieters re-signs with us it will be once he hits the open market.

Keeping him down in AAA to delay his service time is the smart thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it does. You hold him down long enough and he doesnt have the service time to qualify this as a full year and we get a 7th year out of the deal by holding him down for a little bit now.

If we have not signed him before this comes to fruition, then we are the worst franchise in baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not true.

Scott Boras doesn't do extensions. It has nothing to do with our organization.

Scott Boras will be doing what his client wants him to do. Scott boras was aloso going to get manny a 4 year 100 million dollar contract, wasn't he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that is if they really think he is not ready.

It makes no since to hold him back because of service time. If has is 3/4 as good as everyone thinks he is, we will try to sign him to a long tern lucrative contract before the year is over. His service time concern will never be a factor.

I agree with you, but I hope you realize how in the minority we are.

Ah. Yes. No one had thought of that before. It's all much clearer now.

I thought the EXACT same thing :laughlol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott Boras will be doing what his client wants him to do. Scott boras was aloso going to get manny a 4 year 100 million dollar contract, wasn't he?

You have this backwards, Scott Boras' clients do what Scott Boras wants them to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...