Jump to content

O's Getting Hosed, All Star Reserves


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

By the fans' votes, the followings were the first reserves: Mountcastle, Westburg, O'hearn and Santander. How are neither one of them a reserve?

I'd say Oriole fans were overly enthused by their own players and were voting with much zeal.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'd say Oriole fans were overly enthused by their own players and were voting with much zeal.

Yeah no other fanbase was enthused. Makes perfect sense.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mountcastle - Naylor had a stronger week

Westburg - most deserving but 3B is too crowded

O'Hearn - Fry is OPSing .920

Santander - Duran and Greene are just better and Tucker may be replaced by Santander anyway

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Mountcastle - Naylor had a stronger week

Westburg - most deserving but 3B is too crowded

O'Hearn - Fry is OPSing .920

Santander - Duran and Greene are just better and Tucker may be replaced by Santander anyway

I think Kimbrel and Westburg were the two biggest snubs. As good as O’Hearn has been I can’t fault them for not selecting a platoon player unless it’s a case where O’Hearn would be the Orioles only all star representative.

Mountcastle was only in the running because 1B is weak in the AL this year and he’s faded recently. Naylor is more deserving at 1B. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Kimbrel has been better than Clay Holmes, who was chosen by the league. But I'd just as soon Kimbrel get the extra rest. 

Westburg has been better than Marcus Semien, who was selected by the players. That one's a bummer, but oh well. 

For the most part, everyone selected is having a very good season. 

Edited by Spy Fox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spy Fox said:

Kimbrel has been better than Clay Holmes, who was chosen by the league. But I'd just as soon Kimbrel get the extra rest. 

Westburg has been better than Marcus Semien, who was selected by the players. 

But generally, everyone selected is having a good season. 

Has Westburg even played against everyone?

I can't get upset about players not voting for guys in their first full year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I think Kimbrel and Westburg were the two biggest snubs. As good as O’Hearn has been I can’t fault them for not selecting a platoon player unless it’s a case where O’Hearn would be the Orioles only all star representative.

Mountcastle was only in the running because 1B is weak in the AL this year and he’s faded recently. Naylor is more deserving at 1B. 

Yeah 3B is very strong this season

  • Jose Ramirez - 138 OPS+, 2.9 rWAR
  • Rafael Devers - 158 OPS+, 2.7 rWAR
  • Isaac Paredes - 137 OPS+, 1.9 rWAR
  • Jordan Westburg - 140 OPS+, 2.8 rWAR
  • Josh Smith - 139 OPS+, 3.2 rWAR
  • Jose Miranda - 152 OPS+, 2.4 rWAR

What kills Westburg is the one-player-for-every-team policy, which means Paredes gets in over him.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Has Westburg even played against everyone?

I can't get upset about players not voting for guys in their first full year.

Yeah, you expect the players to go for the steady respected vet types. 

Does every player vote? If so, plenty of them probably don't even check stats much and just click through it like an assigned HR training. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Yeah 3B is very strong this season

  • Jose Ramirez - 138 OPS+, 2.9 rWAR
  • Rafael Devers - 158 OPS+, 2.7 rWAR
  • Isaac Paredes - 137 OPS+, 1.9 rWAR
  • Jordan Westburg - 140 OPS+, 2.8 rWAR
  • Josh Smith - 139 OPS+, 3.2 rWAR
  • Jose Miranda - 152 OPS+, 2.4 rWAR

What kills Westburg is the one-player-for-every-team policy, which means Paredes gets in over him.

Westburg not making isn't a huge snub, but he's certainly has a case. The fact that the Orioles had Ty Wiggington as their token all star one season I'm not going to get bent out of shape over Westburg missing the cut.

Besides the one player per team rule Westburg doesn't have the name recognition yet and to a degree the all star game is a popularity contest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's still, basically, a popularity test.  I don't even care if they play in the game or not.  But I know to them it's an honor and it's a bit of a shame for them, but I think they'll probably get over it - OR use the "rebuff" to fuel do even better in the second half.  Who knows.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...