Jump to content

Gunnar or Witt try to be impartial?


bub668

Recommended Posts

Cost is a factor. Witt was willing to sign an extension and will be a Royal for the foreseeable future.

We have Gunnar for four more years. That makes the decision pretty obvious.

They are amazingly similar but I wonder if Witt makes the kind of poor-judgement throws that Gunnar sometimes makes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gunnar for me.  More career WAR in over 500 fewer at bats.  More WAR this season even with Witt hitting .341.   Witt is one of the most valuable players in the game right now, but Gunnar is the most valuable player in the game right now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

Gunnar for me.  More career WAR in over 500 fewer at bats.  More WAR this season even with Witt hitting .341.   Witt is one of the most valuable players in the game right now, but Gunnar is the most valuable player in the game right now.  

fWAR has it Witt, Judge, Henderson right now.

rWAR has it Judge/Henderson, Witt.

 

It's basically a three way tie.

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Why should I be impartial?   It's a fan board.

Because that was the terms the OP presented.

You could always decline to participate.

A thread going Whoo boy Gunnar sure is better than Witt would be lame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...