Jump to content

Should Rubenstein relieve Mike Elias of his duties?


webbrick2010

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 

The thing most are missing here is that deadline trades rarely work out for either side. 
 

I don't disagree here, I'm just curious...what's your definition of working out?

I do believe deadline deals are a bit overrated.  I get that the deadline is exciting but I think it's rare that a guy you pick up is the one to get you over the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The Os traded next to nothing for 10 starts.

The thing most are missing here is that deadline trades rarely work out for either side. 

The deal was fine and one you always do when you are in the position the Os were in. I think if you want to complain about something it would be why didn’t the Os get out of Flaherty what the Tigers could. To me, that’s the better conversation to have.

Where are you getting 10 starts for Mancini? The Orioles got McDermott and Seth Johnson for him. The Rays were the winner of that 3-team trade so far. Jose Siri has been worth 3.3 rWAR for them. The book is not written on McDermott yet and Seth Johnson did help get Soto. 

I 100% wonder why Flaherty was such a zero for the Orioles when he's been pretty good since. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't disagree here, I'm just curious...what's your definition of working out?

I do believe deadline deals are a bit overrated.  I get that the deadline is exciting but I think it's rare that a guy you pick up is the one to get you over the top.

I would define as a trade that helps you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Where are you getting 10 starts for Mancini? The Orioles got McDermott and Seth Johnson for him. The Rays were the winner of that 3-team trade so far. Jose Siri has been worth 3.3 rWAR for them. The book is not written on McDermott yet and Seth Johnson did help get Soto. 

I 100% wonder why Flaherty was such a zero for the Orioles when he's been pretty good since. 

The 10 starts were for Flaherty.

The Os hit the Mancini trade out of the park. McDermott is a real prospect and a good arm. He’s easily worth more than Mancini was and is.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The 10 starts were for Flaherty.

The Os hit the Mancini trade out of the park. McDermott is a real prospect and a good arm. He’s easily worth more than Mancini was and is.

Agree about the Mancini trade. I'd say the Mancini trade was even a win at the time it happened because he wasn't going to be used here, he was blocking other players, and it gave him an opportunity to get to a contender. I still really like McDermott, and I even thought Seth Johnson (and I still do!) has upside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The 10 starts were for Flaherty.

The Os hit the Mancini trade out of the park. McDermott is a real prospect and a good arm. He’s easily worth more than Mancini was and is.

Not yet. And his debut was unsuccessful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Prodigyx said:

After looking back at the Astros drafts from 2012 to 2017 it looks like he completely switched his draft strategy.  Which makes me wonder why. 

 Could it be with Angelos as the owner he knew we couldn't or wouldnt spend big money for pitching?

  Now with Rubenstein as the owner, could he be a little more willing to spend, so that could change his strategy going forward.

He wasn't the final decision maker in Houston..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This post is beyond idiotic. The guy put us in a position to be a top 5 powerhouse, even with all the injuries, and yet we have fans talking about dismissing him. We’d easily be the top team in the league if we still had our full rotation and closer in place. I can’t believe some of our fans are so blind to the fact that the entire league is salivating over our talent, yet here we are complaining. The grass isn’t always greener on the other side. I know slumping sucks, but that’s just the nature of the game. For those on the fence, take a chill pill and breathe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Just Regular said:

I do think the Mark Appel-Brady Aiken 1-2 punch might have driven some SIGBOT knobs getting turned.

Quibbling over that ligament diameter or whatever it was got them to the Bregman-Tucker pair that now is perhaps nearing the end of its run.

With those guys they were top of round 1 picks so I get the reluctance of Elias not wanting to take pitchers in the first especially high in the first. My problem is when he takes O Farrell  over Brecht with #32 pick. If he's gun shy to pick a pitcher high in the draft fine but when you get a free pick there by Gunner winning ROY for me it's  go with the high ceiling pitcher even if there is risk involved. I was disappointed the Orioles passed him up there in that spot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Well, I guess I need to get to the stadium by 11 AM today to watch Urias and Westburg here in Nashville! The stadium is 50 feet from my office window.
    • No, It is my understanding that he is now a FA. Any team that picks him up is on the hook for prorated minimum this year only. The O's owe him the buy out. 
    • Burnes starting won’t help anyone hit. And I have minimal expectations for Westburg in his very first game back.    We just gave up 15 runs to a pretty damn pedestrian SF lineup last two games. I don’t think a ‘hangover lineup’ is going to help as much as you think. Plus again, if we can’t score it doesn’t matter much what the opposing lineup looks like.    I did just realize we have 10 games left, not 11. 3-7 seems even less likely than 3-8, ha.   
    • Game 1 Corbin Burnes, and Sunday Jordan Westburg and a bullpen game before an off day? We'll see in 10 days, but I think the Tigers run of good play at the end will have helped protect OPACY home field for the ALWC round. Very happy flight for the Tigers, and I'd guess they are asleep at their Baltimore hotel by now, waiting for tomorrow night.    Tigers home next week with two Skubal starts if necessary and a White Sox series, so the Royals and Twins are probably cheering pretty hard for us. If we finish this week 0-4, the Yankees might have that hangover lineup the day after division clinching one of our games there.    It looks pretty likely while we are in New York, the guys will have a front row seat handing over the AL East champion honor.
    • They still need to win a few games to get there. I still don’t understand why people are acting like that is so certain (quoting you but not referring to you, per se).    3-8 in the last 11. 11 games left. In all seriousness, what makes anyone think we can even go 3-8 in the next 11?  We are bad in every single phase of the game and we’re playing against teams who have everything to play for (other than SF today, and they’ve pretty easily handled us this week already).    These last two games against SF, especially last night, have convinced me they’re going to fully blow this. We’ve already shown that Detroit can handle us. Probably going to lose to Webb today. Then it’s NY in NY. When is the last time we beat the Yanks in a late season series that mattered to both teams?  Ever? This team certainly isn’t the one to do it. And then it’s do or die in MIN. Anybody believe we can take 2/3 there?  I just don’t see a path to more than three wins, and even getting three doesn’t seem remotely certain. I think we’ll be lucky to win one game each of these last three series. Maybe that’s enough, but I’m far from sure they can even do that.    What’s the counterpoint to this?  Injury returns?  Too late for that IMO. Just start playing better?  What would make anyone believe that’s going to happen after 3.5 months of bad baseball? For real, someone tell me what they’re seeing that makes them think even 3-8 is going to happen in the next 11. 
    • We traded far too much for what we got in return IMO. You can't totally judge trades this early but as it stands now, Elias gets a well deserved D for his trade deadline performance. I've said this before. He's done a fantastic job bringing this club back to relevancy. I just question some of his roster construction and trade decisions.
    • Since July 1st, the Orioles are 31-37 and since the Trading deadline when Elias was supposed to make the team better they've gone 19-24 (.441). Now grant it the team lost Westburg and Grayson as well as Eflin for a little bit, but what can't be swept under the rug is that Elias traded a decent part of his minor league league prospects and the team has done worse. The acquisitions of Rogers, Jimenez and Soto have not improved the team. Eflin has kept them from being even worse and we have him for next year, and the same goes for Dominguez. Hopefully Soto will figure it out or Elias wasted two pitching prospects (Chace being probably being the one with the most upside of any pitcher traded).  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...