Jump to content

He's back! Tejada signs 1-yr deal.


jamessemaj

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I have stated my displeasure for AM's offseason pretty loud on here, but signing Miggy is a very good move IMO. I think we are without a doubt a much better team now that Miggy is coming back. And, I also think that Miggy will be a very good defensive third baseman. He started to slip as a shortstop because his range has been diminishing, but his hands are excellent. And the real topper for me is his arm. Miggy has an absolute rocket, and that will play very well at third.

Now, I think that AM has supplied DT with the players he needs to see a significant improvement in the W-L collumn. I now really like our lineup and we will no longer get eaten up by LH pitching.

1) Roberts-2B

2) Markakis-RF

3) Reimold- LF

4) Wieters- C

5) Tejada- 3B

6) Scott- DH

7) Jones- CF

8) Atkins- 1B

9) Izzy- SS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People keep saying this, but he has played third before, just not in MLB. He played third for the Dominican team in the WBC and I'm pretty sure he played it in winter league.

Besides, he played one game in A+ ball back in '96. 5 total chance...one error. What more do you want?:D Welcome back Miggy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome back Miggy. A fine signing in my view.

Agreed. I like the signing given what was available.

The Atkins signing still confuses me though. Not sure where Wiggington and Luke Scott fit into all this either.

Now go get Bedard or another starter for insurance and Hendrickson and another bullpen arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy says the league is shifting to defense ...and then he signs a starting 3b that has never played 3b before :eek::confused:

Not trying to put words in your mouth, but the O's should pass on signing Tejada to get Crede because of a philosophical statement? Too rigid to think he has to live and die by a belief system. Tejada is, to me, the better of the two signings. But time will tell. And it's not like he's incompetent, either.

I'm sure he'll learn to play 3B well enough not to blow a bunch of games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have stated my displeasure for AM's offseason pretty loud on here, but signing Miggy is a very good move IMO. I think we are without a doubt a much better team now that Miggy is coming back. And, I also think that Miggy will be a very good defensive third baseman. He started to slip as a shortstop because his range has been diminishing, but his hands are excellent. And the real topper for me is his arm. Miggy has an absolute rocket, and that will play very well at third.

Now, I think that AM has supplied DT with the players he needs to see a significant improvement in the W-L collumn. I now really like our lineup and we will no longer get eaten up by LH pitching.

1) Roberts-2B

2) Markakis-RF

3) Reimold- LF

4) Wieters- C

5) Tejada- 3B

6) Scott- DH

7) Jones- CF

8) Atkins- 1B

9) Izzy- SS

Personally I wouldnt be at all surprised tp see Tejada start the season batting 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team actually has the option of carrying a three man bench because Miggy can backup at SS and Wiggy can come in at 3b. Alternatively, Turner may get an opportunity to replace Andino because Tejada gives DT a reasonably good option at SS.

I think the only reason Andino made the team last year was because the O's had no other reasonable option at SS. By all accounts, Miggy can still play an effective SS (not above average, maybe not even average, but reasonable as a backup) and I'd much rather have a quality bat on the bench than Andino who gives us nothing outside of his glove backing up short.

Of course, I am not against having another bat on the bench. I just wonder who he is going to hit for? Izturis will need to be pinch hit for, but after that I don't see anyone else that a pinch hitter will be used for. The O's will have Wiggy, Scott or Pie on the bench to pinch hit for Izturis.

Late in a game that Izturis has been pinch hit for I who rather have Andino at SS then Miggy.

I am fine with Miggy starting games at SS to give Izturis a break or when Izturis is injured. That makes sense. But if Izturis is not available (he is not durable and goes on the DL roughly once a seaon) then the O's will need a backup at SS. I can see Andino getting more playing time then Montanez or Aubrey as the 25th man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with this. If Crede were more reliable he'd have been the better signing. Of course, then he likely would have already signed with someone.

Now Crede will sign elsewhere, play 120-140 games and put up better numbers than Tejada. :eektf: (Yes, this was sarcasm.)

I'm glad we agree. I know you don't love the signing, but I will say that I don't think stability should be under-rated. (Not that you're under-rating it.) The fact that in the past few years we've trotted out sub-replacement level players at a number of positions has countered the fact that we had good young talent. Finding a 3B with a .750 OPS who can play 150 games is important for creating a foundation that our true talent (the young players) can build upon.

I'm curious about the Bedard thing - because that's a bit different, but equally interesting. He's not necessary stability, like say Tejada, but rather the kind of guy who puts a good young rotation over the top if he's recovered. Big if.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be so wonderful if he was brought on to play SS, forcing Izzy to the bench.

THis does mean no Andino, which is nice.

Definitely on the fence for this move...I like the signing in and of itself but the way Pie will be used now makes me like the move a lot less.

I am hoping for average defense and a 350ish OBP from MIggy.

I agree about Pie, but I didn't sound like he was going to get much playing time regardless since DT wants Reimold in left consistently.

It's a decent move that brings more versatility to the table which is nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besides, he played one game in A+ ball back in '96. 5 total chance...one error. What more do you want?:D Welcome back Miggy.

I didn't say he had extensive experience there. People get their panties in a bunch when somebody misquotes a player's OPS+ by two points, but some total (though not earthshaking) inaccuracies can slide.

If nothing else, I would think that Miggy's recent experience at 3B in the WBC would give him an idea of what he needs to work on between now and opening day. It's better than nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy says the league is shifting to defense ...and then he signs a starting 3b that has never played 3b before :eek::confused:

I don't think he was valuing Miggi's bat over Crede's D. I think he was valuing Miggi's abilty to get out of bed every morning and be able to actually take the field. By that criteria, I think he got the only available guy.

While I don't really know, I bet this "100 game adjustment period" is mostly about feeling comfortable playing over there. I bet Miggi will kick a few at first, but I bet he also makes some great plays too. Plus, of the ones he boots, I bet some of them will be ones he knocks down without catching it, but then picks it up and throws the guy out by a hair. We're gonna find ourselves saying "Saved by the gun!!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand anyone's fascination with Crede - he's Tony Batista with less power. A career OBP of .304 is not what we need.

Well if you only considered the offensive numbers of the guy your SN is dedicated to, you'd probably have a lack of understanding of why he's a HOF'er.

So to answer your question, defense is why some like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say he had extensive experience there. People get their panties in a bunch when somebody misquotes a player's OPS+ by two points, but some total (though not earthshaking) inaccuracies can slide.

If nothing else, I would think that Miggy's recent experience at 3B in the WBC would give him an idea of what he needs to work on between now and opening day. It's better than nothing.

At this point in his career, a move to third is the most logical step for Miggy. At 36, he will not be anybody's everyday SS. He should be able to adjust. The ball comes off the bat a liitle different down the line with a split second last reaction time. A lost step is not as obvious as long as he maintains good hands and a willing chest. Since the ball gets there a little faster, you do have the extra time to scramble and still make the throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...