Jump to content

He's back! Tejada signs 1-yr deal.


jamessemaj

Recommended Posts

I'm not saying it will definitely work. I think it will, and have long thought that Tejada had the skill set to make a decent 3B. But I'm curious about why we'd think someone who was at least a legitimate MLB SS would be unable to play 3B. I mean, he's certainly got the arm.

He can do it, but look at how long it took Mora and Ripken to get adjusted.

He's likely to be a defensive liablity for half a season or more. And he's gone after this year.

Bell is likely a better defender at the position than Tejada will be. If you are going to put a stopgap there, they should be better than what Bell would be if he were to start on Opening Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply

At least now with Miguel Tejada back the role players aren't asked to do more than just that. There may indeed be a transitional time for Tejada though I suspect the man would like to continue being paid well and wants to continue playing a few more years. My guess is that whatever troubles he has, he will work them out quick.

B. Roberts (2B)

M. Tejada (3B)

N. Markakis (RF)

A. Jones (CF)

M. Weiters ©

N. Reimold (LF)

L. Scott (DH)

G. Atkins (1B)

C. Izturis (SS)

My problem with my own suggestion here is Jones batting 4th. If he is hitting for good average and not trying to crush the ball he's a good bet there. I put Markakis third because he has his contract and they want to see him put up nasty RBI totals. Weiters is only going to become that star catcher we've all dreamed of him becoming if he is in a position to do it. I wonder when he is up for arbitration? Could the team hijack his statistics somewhat by having him bat lower? Having Tejada back with his high average history makes me think he is going to be at the plate early. I don't know that his declining power is half as important as him having another high average season at the plate.

It seems preposterous that an A.L. East team would bat their 1B in the 8th spot. However I can't see them batting him higher than 6th all season. They could but I just don't think they will. I would guess by mid June Felix Pie isn't as much a worry as he is now. He's never been an everyday player and only seems to give glimpses of promise. If he is solid as the fourth outfielder then it's fine. When he proves he is an everyday player then we can tackle that.

Now should Reimold have injury troubles and Pie is very ordinary (as I suspect) then Luke Scott might get his wish and play some LF. Right now it looks like he isn't going to see much if any time at 1B. I really think Atkins is the odd man out here. If the experiment works out and Atkins is for real...We already know Brandon Snyder is inching his way closer to Baltimore... We really might have a solid trade chip at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's like an automatic response with you, right? "Hmmmm...negative...negative...what can I find to whine about?"

eeyore.jpg

How is that response negative?

I'm just saying I hope Jones gets to keep his #10 and that Tejada could take #6 to honor his friend Mora.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironically enough if Tejada's 2009 BABIP comes back to something close to his career BABIP and if his ISO-D (OBP-BA) is something close to his 2009 level, then Tejada's OBP may not be much higher than .304.

The problem with this is that it's not very likely: since leaving Oakland in 2004, he hasn't had a BABIP below .300. And it ranged from the low .300s to .350 as an Oriole. His .320 BABIP is pretty much in keeping with his recent historical performance, and his career BABIP is pretty clearly weighed down by abysmal BABIPs from early in his career.

I expect him to maintain his contact skills, walk too little, and show sub-B-Rob like power. I'll be surprised if he's below .750 and surprised if he's above .810 OPS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo.

So post AS break we might see some defensive improvement, but when you have a young staff, that defense at the hot corner is important.

Hopefully he's got enough left in his bat to make up for that.

I think Michael Young is the floor for Tejada's conversion. He was -10 at UZR last year. If Tejada is -10, but puts up a .775 OPS, then he'll be worth his contract.

Peralta was -6 in UZR/150 last year, put up a .690 OPS and was still worth over $5m or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why....why....why...does everyone ASSUME the Tejada can handle playing 3B, especially when HE HAS NEVER PLAYED THERE BEFORE? !!!

And also, I think it' s a poor assumption that he'll be able to go back and forth between SS and 3B like it's nothing.

Cal Freaking Ripken himself was apprehensive about going to SS in an exhibition (All Star game) for one inning - admitting that he didn't want to 'get killed out there'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Michael Young is the floor for Tejada's conversion. He was -10 at UZR last year. If Tejada is -10, but puts up a .775 OPS, then he'll be worth his contract.

Peralta was -6 in UZR/150 last year, put up a .690 OPS and was still worth over $5m or so.

I don't think his contract will be a problem as he will likely earn it, but I'm more worried about a groundball pitcher like Bergesen who will be affected by the lack of a solid defensive option at 3B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And also, I think it' s a poor assumption that he'll be able to go back and forth between SS and 3B like it's nothing.

Cal Freaking Ripken himself was apprehensive about going to SS in an exhibition (All Star game) for one inning - admitting that he didn't want to 'get killed out there'.

We shouldn't assume it. But we keep using Ripken as a some kind of comparison and I don't think it's apt. Ripken was tall, and relatively stiff, who maintained defensive excellence with great hands, a strong arm, and superior positioning. Tejada is 5'10, and a more fluid athlete, even if he doesn't have the range he once (might have) had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think his contract will be a problem as he will likely earn it, but I'm more worried about a groundball pitcher like Bergesen who will be affected by the lack of a solid defensive option at 3B.

There is a risk that he'll struggle. But even if he does, I don't think he struggles to be anything more than a below-average 3B. I.e., Atkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • For two years we talked about 7+ run leads possibly not being Baumann proof. I probably would have DFA'd Perez first, but I don't fault them here. They needed to get rid of someone and he was one of the two least reliable options out of the pen. I guess Perez got the LHP hard thrower advantage, even though he's not good.
    • Boras has never had a guy sign a long-term extension with 2 years of service time or less. I'm sure it's something they will look long and hard at after the season. I don't expect that to change in May of this year, but I do think that if they make an offer that he turns down, people won't think they lowballed him.
    • I'd have optioned Akin too...but I'd have DFA's Cionel Perez before Baumann
    • Not saying they are one jerk but there’s always likely something that is the straw that broke the camels back and that outing yesterday may have been it.
    • I know you can go to the MLB.com site and see a highlight with commentary and all that, but I had a hunch last night for this particular AB and got lucky.  Was enjoying myself too much live to capture either of the triples for timing purposes 😆  But it was fun hearing this huge crowd erupt as it was headed back to tie things up in the bottom of the first!  
    • Agreed. My point was that the fans knew the Nats were trying.  The Orioles have not tried.  People can say that we don’t know but Gunnar was asked and said there were no talks that he had any knowledge of.  No player should be upset if the Orioles came out and said they wanted some extensions.  And the fans are going to be happy they are at least trying. Right now we have no evidence they have even tried.  This is why many, including some defending saying nothing, were upset with Angelos. 
    • It's hard to hit your way out of a slump when you are on the bench. Mullins is going to get chances, I don't believe he's completely cooked.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...