Jump to content

Roch talks about filling 1B


JTrea81

Recommended Posts

Vmart for 2 years and an option would be very solid.

VMart for 3 years at 12 million or less would be tolerable but not really that great.

Vmart for 4 years, ie the length of contract we need to give him, would be horrible.

For the Red Sox yes. For the O's, the price of admission. We have to overpay to play.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I rank them like this

1. Britton

2. Matusz

3. Arrieta

4. Tillman

Some would be surprised to see Britton ahead of Matusz, but groundball pitchers fit the O's the best and Britton has an insane GB rate which makes him made for OPACY. The fact that he's LH shoots him to the top as our most valuable pitcher IMO.

Tillman is the most expendable out of those 4, though I wouldn't hesitate to trade Arrieta in the right deal.

I agree with those rankings, GB pitchers are so valuable in the MLB. I just really hope he doesn't hit the wall like Porcello has even though he is still such a young pitcher.

If Britton can keep the ball on the ground and get 4-6 K's a game then he will develop into a great pitcher for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the Red Sox yes. For the O's, the price of admission. We have to overpay to play.

No, for the Red Sox, it would be no big deal because when he isn't good, they can afford that..The Orioles can't.

A 4 year contract for Vmart is just stupid..You have to really not know what you are doing to give him that contract.

If it takes 4 years for him to come here, and I think it would, then you move on to the next option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vmart for 2 years and an option would be very solid.

VMart for 3 years at 12 million or less would be tolerable but not really that great.

Vmart for 4 years, ie the length of contract we need to give him, would be horrible.

Given the other 1B options out there, I wouldn't even be happy with him for 2 years. I'd pass. His real value is at catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, for the Red Sox, it would be no big deal because when he isn't good, they can afford that..The Orioles can't.

A 4 year contract for Vmart is just stupid..You have to really not know what you are doing to give him that contract.

If it takes 4 years for him to come here, and I think it would, then you move on to the next option.

If you keep applying that logic, and keep on moving to lesser and lesser options, but find that each one is not worth us paying what the market would pay, eventually you wind up inviting Garrett Atkins back for the major league minimum.

Sometimes you have to pay for what you need. If my pipes burst tonight, and I call all the plumbers and decide that each one is charging more than I feel their work is worth, then do I not hire a plumber? No, because I NEED to get it fixed.

I'm not necessarily advocating a pro-Martinez position here. It's just that when you ahve a gaping hole on your team that NEEDS to be filled, shooting down possibilities merely because they are not cost-effective is not going to fly with me. UNLESS you ALSO demonstrate that there ARE cost-effective ways to fill that position out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you keep applying that logic, and keep on moving to lesser and lesser options, but find that each one is not worth us paying what the market would pay, eventually you wind up inviting Garrett Atkins back for the major league minimum.

Sometimes you have to pay for what you need. If my pipes burst tonight, and I call all the plumbers and decide that each one is charging more than I feel their work is worth, then do I not hire a plumber? No, because I NEED to get it fixed.

I'm not necessarily advocating a pro-Martinez position here. It's just that when you ahve a gaping hole on your team that NEEDS to be filled, shooting down possibilities merely because they are not cost-effective is not going to fly with me. UNLESS you ALSO demonstrate that there ARE cost-effective ways to fill that position out there.

You overpay for players that make sense..Vmart isn't one of those players. Dunn isn't one of those players.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Tillman's perceived value (what we could get in a trade for him) is anywhere near his actual value (what he will become). So, unless someone wants to pay for his "actual value" I wouldn't trade him.
I agree! With trades you have to strike while the iron is hot. With Tillman the iron has barely touched the fire. I think it would have to be a package deal to get any value for Tillman. So who else do the O's have to trade to get a decent 1b/3b?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You overpay for players that make sense..Vmart isn't one of those players. Dunn isn't one of those players.
What you don't seem to understand is that we will have to overpay for any of the FA 1B, VMart, Lee or Overbay. If you want to go that route that's the reality of it. So if you want Lee you will have to overpay him for at least 2 years. Is he going to be more productive than Martinez for those 2 years? So if you want more production in the next 2-3 years you are going to have to overpay for it, whether VMart, Dunn, or Konerko is your flavor of the month. Of course we could always fill that hole with one of your magical trades.:rolleyestf:.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of anything else, I think when Roch prints this speculation it immediately lessens Tillman's trade value. I know Roch's job is to be a journalist, but... still.

Tillman's trade value is determined by other teams' scouting reports and needs, and by their general sense of the marketplace based on conversations with other teams' front office people. When Hendry or Towers or Daniels are considering a trade, I am pretty sure that they don't run an online search and read every snippet that has been written about the prospective target. They don't have to: if Tillman is available, that is already common knowledge within the game.

And yes, Roch's job is to be a journalist. Or at least a quasi-journalist, given his unusual position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tillman's trade value is determined by other teams' scouting reports and needs, and by their general sense of the marketplace based on conversations with other teams' front office people. When Hendry or Towers or Daniels are considering a trade, I am pretty sure that they don't run an online search and read every snippet that has been written about the prospective target. They don't have to: if Tillman is available, that is already common knowledge within the game.

And yes, Roch's job is to be a journalist. Or at least a quasi-journalist, given his unusual position.

I hope you are absolutely right. I'd like to see a nice trade this off-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rochester
What you don't seem to understand is that we will have to overpay for any of the FA 1B, VMart, Lee or Overbay. If you want to go that route that's the reality of it. So if you want Lee you will have to overpay him for at least 2 years. Is he going to be more productive than Martinez for those 2 years? So if you want more production in the next 2-3 years you are going to have to overpay for it, whether VMart, Dunn, or Konerko is your flavor of the month. Of course we could always fill that hole with one of your magical trades.:rolleyestf:.

I like this... someday we will need to overpay for someone that will help instead of paying someone who is well, unhelpful. When do we start?

El Gordo is right - for us to get to a point to not overpay for quality we will need to overpay for quality so the results are better which will mean we hopefully won't have to overpay in the future because our overpaid players...

aww forget it..:o

I will say I assume a majority of folks here would rather not give VMart a 4 year deal but to call is stupid is being a bit reactionary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you don't seem to understand is that we will have to overpay for any of the FA 1B, VMart, Lee or Overbay. If you want to go that route that's the reality of it. So if you want Lee you will have to overpay him for at least 2 years. Is he going to be more productive than Martinez for those 2 years? So if you want more production in the next 2-3 years you are going to have to overpay for it, whether VMart, Dunn, or Konerko is your flavor of the month. Of course we could always fill that hole with one of your magical trades.:rolleyestf:.

It must suck to be someone that has to interact with you on a daily basis.

Anyway, I would rather overpay for 2 years than 4. The years are the real issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this... someday we will need to overpay for someone that will help instead of paying someone who is well, unhelpful. When do we start?

El Gordo is right - for us to get to a point to not overpay for quality we will need to overpay for quality so the results are better which will mean we hopefully won't have to overpay in the future because our overpaid players...

aww forget it..:o

I will say I assume a majority of folks here would rather not give VMart a 4 year deal but to call is stupid is being a bit reactionary

Only if you choose to ignore stats and 100 years of baseball history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rochester
Only if you choose to ignore stats and 100 years of baseball history.

I am not disagreeing but at the same time, there has to be a time that we bite the bullet...Tex was supposed to be and should have been IMO but spending (IIRC) $10M on Atkins and Tejada is worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...