Jump to content

Can we stop with the,"Davis won't be on the roster next year" stuff?


higgybaby

Recommended Posts

There is no way that chris Davis will be on anybody else's roster but this team next year. To suggest so is just an emotional reaction to your disappointment in this seasons performance.

You do not give up on a guy who is only a season removed from 53 home runs, 138 RBI, .286 avg, .370 OBP and someone who was in the conversation for 2013 MVP.

It just doesn't happen. Be real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

He was a replacement level player that will make around 12M next year. Not difficult to come up with justification for why he won't be back, and it has nothing to do with a suspension. Outside of last year, he's had one season that would justify anything close to that kind of compensation.

If there's a money crunch, because we want to sign Cruz, or Nick, or Miller, or anyone else, he's the first place I'd look to cut costs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a replacement level player that will make around 12M next year. Not difficult to come up with justification for why he won't be back, and it has nothing to do with a suspension. Outside of last year, he's had one season that would justify anything close to that kind of compensation.

If there's a money crunch, because we want to sign Cruz, or Nick, or Miller, or anyone else, he's the first place I'd look to cut costs.

Even under the current arbitration rules I don't know if Boras heads into arbitration asking for a 20% raise after last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might look to cut costs there first but a MLB Gm wouldn't.

The potential there is too great. Gm's are too risk adverse generally speaking, to make that kind of a move this soon.

If he were to not perform next year, that's a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might look to cut costs there first but a MLB Gm wouldn't.

The potential there is too great. Gm's are too risk adverse generally speaking, to make that kind of a move this soon.

If he were to not perform next year, that's a different story.

It is a different story regardless, he is a FA after next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a replacement level player that will make around 12M next year. Not difficult to come up with justification for why he won't be back, and it has nothing to do with a suspension. Outside of last year, he's had one season that would justify anything close to that kind of compensation.

If there's a money crunch, because we want to sign Cruz, or Nick, or Miller, or anyone else, he's the first place I'd look to cut costs.

And because the only thing he does better than pearce is hit HR's, and Pearce has pretty good power himself. I like CD, but I admit that I am a bit arse chapped at the adderal suspension this year. Its a money thing now, and it may well make the best sense to look at allocating his dollars in other areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And because the only thing he does better than pearce is hit HR's, and Pearce has pretty good power himself. I like CD, but I admit that I am a bit arse chapped at the adderal suspension this year. Its a money thing now, and it may well make the best sense to look at allocating his dollars in other areas.

Pearce has issues with his wrist and has never played a full season.

Not trying to dog on Pearce, but his bat was very cold against the Royals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davis returning depends on a lot of things, the first of which is whether the guy can actually produce when not on adderall. I'm sure the team knows when he used and when he didn't but we don't know. If he really does need it to perform, and the league won't grant a waiver, why would we keep him? He'll either struggle again or take it and possibly get a huge suspension, neither of which the Orioles want. There's also the Pearce factor. Does he end up in the OF or does Nick come back along with De Aza and whomever else pushing Pearce to DH/1st? How close do they think Walker is and do they want him at DH/1st? What happens if someone offers a trade for Davis that DD really likes? Do we sign Cruz and/or Miller and/or someone else expensive and need to save money? Do we trade someone like Norris and what do we get in return - what if we got a good corner OF, DH or 1B? And so on. While it's very likely Davis is back, there are far too many moving parts right now to guarantee it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I always thought that if you weren't around 10:1 you weren't trying hard enough.
    • Adley was a nearly finished product when picked, if not for tradition and service time stuff he could have been in the majors shortly after he left college. Gunnar needed 1000+ minor league plate appearances as a high school pick. Ask this same question about the 1990-2017 Orioles with their development system. They certainly could have found a way to screw up Gunnar, would have been harder with Adley.
    • I don’t think it was weird at all.  EDC said it but I thought it unfolded as expected.  You knew the QBs would go. You knew tons of OT and WR would go.   This was always going to be an offense dominated first round. The Oline and WR depth is in every round. I suspect that they go Oline twice or Oline/WR tonight.  Obviously you never know how the board falls but I think that’s what is likely.   This is mainly going to be an offense draft. EDC said a few weeks ago that they will draft a RB.  My guess is that the RB goes sometime in day 3. They will come out of this draft with at least 2 more Olineman, one WR and one RB.  I suspect they take a safety at some point as well. The question will be do they take 9 players.  The Ravens didn’t feel this was a draft with as many draftable players as years past, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they make some kind of a trade. 
    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...