Jump to content

Could Somebody tell Me Why MLB Bothers to Have Play Reviews & Challenges?


MagicBird

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply
That may be, but the horrendous misses are inexcusable.

How they missed the HR, and even worse the play at 1st base is inexcusable. And they remain in the shadows too, I mean do they list who the officials in NY are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have corrected many, many bad calls. They could correct more. It's not perfect but it's better than what we had before.

I prefer no replay. It slows the game down and they are often wrong. I also like it when an umpire makes a call it is final.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer no replay. It slows the game down and they are often wrong. I also like it when an umpire makes a call it is final.

We have benefited from some overturned calls this year and they should have been overturned. But the 2 tonight were awful. Simply no excuse. They were worse than the Dez Bryant catch in the GB playoff game that Blindino overturned and has been trying to justify for almost 2 years.

Replay isnt the problem. Its the idiots that cant get the obvious correct that are the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have benefited from some overturned calls this year and they should have been overturned. But the 2 tonight were awful. Simply no excuse. They were worse than the Dez Bryant catch in the GB playoff game that Blindino overturned and has been trying to justify for almost 2 years.

Replay isnt the problem. Its the idiots that cant get the obvious correct that are the problem.

I think it is more the fundamental limitations of replay than it is the failings of the video umps. Last year, less than half of challenged plays were overturned. So in the majority of cases two groups of people looking at high resolution video of the same play came to diametrically opposite conclusions. For the sake of those other cases, we have to wait out every close and exciting play for the NY umps to weigh in, or for a team's video folks to decide that a challenge isn't worth it. Maybe the tradeoff makes sense in the playoffs where a few individual games and even plays weigh so large. But, for me, I would much rather wait out managers and players futilely arguing with umps than to press pause on every other exciting play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How they missed the HR' date=' and even worse the play at 1st base is inexcusable. And they remain in the shadows too, I mean do they list who the officials in NY are?[/quote']They are umpires to and just as fallible, Could be tonight's NY crew was Joe West, Laz Diaz, CB and the Angel.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The MLB like the NFL needs to change the standard on these replays from absolute certainty to whatever appears to be likely the right call.

If you want to get it right, get it right more often.

They need to take the politics out of it as well. They shouldn't have umpires evaluating other umpires calls.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a true shame that our great game has been infected with instant replay. The sight of umpires grouped together with their headsets on. The delay in the game. The not knowing if what you just witnessed and cheered for will hold up. It's all not worth it. Go away replay! Game was better without it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a true shame that our great game has been infected with instant replay. The sight of umpires grouped together with their headsets on. The delay in the game. The not knowing if what you just witnessed and cheered for will hold up. It's all not worth it. Go away replay! Game was better without it.

Yea, it was much better when an ump missed a call and Lou Piniella or somebody would scream and throw stuff and get tossed and delay the game for 10 minutes and then 100% of those calls were still wrong and everyone with a TV knew it and nobody could do a thing about it.

Ah, the good ol' days. Why can't they come back? Along with cholera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, it was much better when an ump missed a call and Lou Piniella or somebody would scream and throw stuff and get tossed and delay the game for 10 minutes and then 100% of those calls were still wrong and everyone with a TV knew it and nobody could do a thing about it.

Ah, the good ol' days. Why can't they come back? Along with cholera.

You have to admit, Earl Weaver's tirades were more entertaining than watching a bunch of umps standing around with headphones on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think it was weird at all.  EDC said it but I thought it unfolded as expected.  You knew the QBs would go. You knew tons of OT and WR would go.   This was always going to be an offense dominated first round. The Oline and WR depth is in every round. I suspect that they go Oline twice or Oline/WR tonight.  Obviously you never know how the board falls but I think that’s what is likely.   This is mainly going to be an offense draft. EDC said a few weeks ago that they will draft a RB.  My guess is that the RB goes sometime in day 3. They will come out of this draft with at least 2 more Olineman, one WR and one RB.  I suspect they take a safety at some point as well. The question will be do they take 9 players.  The Ravens didn’t feel this was a draft with as many draftable players as years past, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they make some kind of a trade. 
    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...