Jump to content

Would you trade Adam Jones even up for these CF's?


Frobby

I'd trade Adam Jones even up to get (multiple selections allowed):  

202 members have voted

  1. 1. I'd trade Adam Jones even up to get (multiple selections allowed):


This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 645
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

This is a great point. the only way for Jones to increase his value was to come up big down the stretch and in the playoffs. Then he could have that veteranosity tag attached to him. 

Of course, his .155/.206/.207/.413 playoff slash line in 63 PAs suggests that the spot light may not be where he shines.

I really doubt smart front offices put a lot of stock into small-sample-size playoff performances. 

Adam Jones has been consistent in this league long enough that front offices know who he is. Whether that results in a long term deal, I don’t know - but all this nonsense about how he is selfish for refusing a trade or how he is somehow less of a man for refusing to split up his family is in poor taste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

As Duquette noted in his recent interview, players in their 30s can't be counted on in the post PED environment so those big contracts just aren't out there anymore for guys like Jones. 

He could have been playing in meaningful baseball games right now with a chance at a World Series ring instead, he'll be entering into a Free Agency with a bit of a tarnished legacy, and a skill set that screams one year affordable contract. Not sure if he took advice or made this decision on his own, but this has to go down as one of the worse decisions I've seen a veteran major league baseball player make.

The Phillies are 5 games over .500 there is no chance to win a World Series there.  I don't agree that he is only going to get a one year contract.  I don't see how he hurt himself.   He won't have no trade rights with his new team.  

Hyberbole to the max to say it is one of the worst decisions you've seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, esmd said:

If they offer him a QO the entire ownership, FO, and anyone else on the management team who had a part in that decision should be banned from baseball for life.

People say some crazy stuff In this thread.  But if Adam accepted QO it would only be a 1 year deal.  How does a 1 year deal deserve such hyperbole?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TommyPickles said:

Man. Some harsh words for Adam in this thread...

I understand that it’s been a horrible season. I also understand that Jones doesn’t really fit into this team’s rebuild plans. But still. Sheesh. Give this man a break. It’s not like he’s having a bad season. If he had been playing RF from opening day his rWAR would look wayyy better.

He leads the team in ABs (541), hits (154), doubles (32).

He’s struck out less than usual. Hes getting on base at a solid clip (.285 avg, .316 OBP). He’s stolen 7 bases in 8 attempts. He’s got a respectable OPS (.743).

And he’s one of the only players fans still want to go see. I’ve only been to five games this year (the fewest in years for me), but I’m going with about 15-20 people for that last series, mostly just so we can give this man a standing ovation every time he comes up to bat.

He means a lot to the city.

 

 

 

Yeah I have zero idea why people have turned on him. Even if he was having a terrible year why would you be angry if he used his no trade rights? Makes zero sense.  I just find it weird that people are angry and saying ridiculous things In This thread.  At the end of the day it's his decision.  He is allowed to do what he thinks is best for him and his family.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, atomic said:

Yeah I have zero idea why people have turned on him. Even if he was having a terrible year why would you be angry if he used his no trade rights? Makes zero sense.  I just find it weird that people are angry and saying ridiculous things In This thread.  At the end of the day it's his decision.  He is allowed to do what he thinks is best for him and his family.  

It's the opposite side of the service time manipulation coin. I'm fine with Adam's decision for whatever reason. I just don't care. I look at the two veterans the Phillies picked up in August (Bour and Bautista) and what their cost was and can't see Adam bringing much more than a organization bit (Bour) or cash (Bautista). Shoot Wilson Ramos only brought the Rays a PTBL. There is no scenario where Adam brings back anything of value, just salary relief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I questioned with Jones and not going to Philadelphia is why he would rather stay in Baltimore and continue to play for a loser rather than go to Philly (which isn't far away logistically) and compete to go to the playoffs.  Philly at the time was either in the division lead or very close to it, as opposed to being 5.5 out now.  As others have noted on this thread, his career stats in the playoffs have been really abysmal.  I was hoping to see him play on a team with a real chance to get to the playoffs and then maybe he could do some damage there on the big stage and improve on that awful slash line.  It has to be tough as a player to never get a chance to go to the World Series your entire career.....maybe not for all of the players who don't get that opportunity, but for many I am sure that is a big void that unfortunately doesn't go away.  But, as many have said here, that was his choice to make and he chose to stay here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really sure I understand the reaction that there were any new revelations from this interview.    The very first time he was asked about this in public he was extremely curt and kinda surly and said stuff like "If you're gonna be the one to help pay my bills then you can tell me what to do" or something similar.  

This latest talk is a little more direct but the message is the same.  He felt he could get a bigger contract for himself as a regular RF (although I suppose now "regular" is not quite the best word.........but maybe he was promised that earlier in the summer) than as a platoon player.    It was always about his next contract.   And I think that makes perfect sense for a veteran player to look at it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, atomic said:

People say some crazy stuff In this thread.  But if Adam accepted QO it would only be a 1 year deal.  How does a 1 year deal deserve such hyperbole?

There are about $17 million reasons why.  Jones will be lucky to get a multi-year contract offer totaling $17 million while the QO is about that amount for one year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Larry18 said:

It's the opposite side of the service time manipulation coin. I'm fine with Adam's decision for whatever reason. I just don't care. I look at the two veterans the Phillies picked up in August (Bour and Bautista) and what their cost was and can't see Adam bringing much more than a organization bit (Bour) or cash (Bautista). Shoot Wilson Ramos only brought the Rays a PTBL. There is no scenario where Adam brings back anything of value, just salary relief.

I agree with this take - sure it would’ve been nice to offload him, get a piece back, relieve some salary, and see him play in a race. Nonetheless, and it’s easier to say this because it isn’t my money, it really doesn’t matter that much because any prospect return was going to be pretty negligible. Heck, it could’ve just been that Zoellner guy we were all pissin and moanin about getting anyway.

I was surprised and a little disappointed, but it really doesn’t matter that much. I certainly don’t think it warrants badmouthing Adam. It’s just getting so much attention because we’re so ghastly and have nothing else to talk about. Like probably most on here, I love Adam (and he’s one of my favorites all time) so I’ll just enjoy watching him for a few more games in orange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
    • Fair point, but these outliers are squatting like 40% more than Holliday is.  There are likely plenty of guys in the NCAA that can hit Holliday's numbers, and are in his age range.   There were like 50+ guys at this year's combine with a 10 yard split of 1.5 or better or 40 times of 4.5 or better, and 1rm squat correlates with both 10 yard split and 40 time, such that if you hit those numbers in 10 or 40, then your mean 1rm squat would be predicted to be about 2.5x body weight, which would be right around 500 lbs for a 200 lb guy.  If you want to call NFL caliber college guys outliers, I guess?  But Holliday is an MLB caliber guy, so he still fits.   Elite athletes just aren't normal, man.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...