Jump to content

AM on Int'l spending


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

We really have the worst combo of GM and owner for this...and many other things.

Going back to my overslot example, do you think another GM could convince Angelos the Orioles should pay money to the buscones for their talent?

Andy doesn't believe in it himself, so of course he won't persuade Angelos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Am I overreacting to think this is just a ridiculous thing to say? I mean do other organizations look at this and just think, "duh." If this is your philosophy, I mean, go for it. But why say this publicly?

"well see, the players in the Dominican are risky, often times they can be really good in a workout, but that doesn't translate to games." You can get away with that? There's an obvious cure, send scouts and watch them play. And if you can't do that, then don't just do away with the whole market, other teams find good players through these methods.

Anytime AM opens his mouth about this topic, something dumb always comes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to my overslot example, do you think another GM could convince him the Orioles should pay money to the buscones for their talent?

Sure, if he trusts the GM then its fine. He trusts AM and AM clearly is telling him this is the way to win. PA sees the data, the track record, and says ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to my overslot example, do you think another GM could convince Angelos the Orioles should pay money to the buscones for their talent?

Andy doesn't believe in it himself, so of course he won't persuade Angelos.

Who knows...I wouldn't bet on it though...It has never been something PA believed in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, if he trusts the GM then its fine. He trusts AM and AM clearly is telling him this is the way to win. PA sees the data, the track record, and says ok.

PA is a terrible owner but he is a very smart man.

If AM says that stuff to him, wouldn't you figure to ask a follow up question about how other teams are doing it and are very successful with it? But he won't do that because he just doesn't want to spend the money in that market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have always said, the Orioles just do not care about the Int'l side of things and it shows.

AM said enough to where the casual fan says, you know what, he has a point.

This is not what AM is saying at all. He is saying he is not willing to give 7 figure bonuses to guys that have played less than a seasons worth of games at any level. IF you look at it objectively it makes sense. Imagine Keiron Pope in the DR, he is every bit the athlete any of the big bonus DR guys are. Do you think that it would make sense to give him that kind of money. AM is saying he will pay for the risk when it makes sense.

Here is a question for you where did Schoop come from? I see some international guys showing up at the low levels. The thing is any guy AM signed would be at best where Schoop is. If any segment is a place where it is too early to know how he is doing it would be this one. He is making value bets in this market, maybe he knows the size of his bankroll and knows he can't risk losing huge pots trying to hit a homerun every once in a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PA is a terrible owner but he is a very smart man.

If AM says that stuff to him, wouldn't you figure to ask a follow up question about how other teams are doing it and are very successful with it? But he won't do that because he just doesn't want to spend the money in that market.

I mean, I'm not in any position to assume this sort of thing, but I think he really wants to win. I think he thinks AM's plan is the best way to get that. Not really rational from our point of view. And about the 'other teams,' I feel like PA has always felt we had to do things differently, so maybe that aids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not what AM is saying at all. He is saying he is not willing to give 7 figure bonuses to guys that have played less than a seasons worth of games at any level. IF you look at it objectively it makes sense. Imagine Keiron Pope in the DR, he is every bit the athlete any of the big bonus DR guys are. Do you think that it would make sense to give him that kind of money. AM is saying he will pay for the risk when it makes sense.

Here is a question for you where did Schoop come from? I see some international guys showing up at the low levels. The thing is any guy AM signed would be at best where Schoop is. If any segment is a place where it is too early to know how he is doing it would be this one. He is making value bets in this market, maybe he knows the size of his bankroll and knows he can't risk losing huge pots trying to hit a homerun every once in a while.

Miguel Sano - who could have been had for the cost of Garrett Atkins. Atkins was more risky.

MacPhail takes risks, but for smaller amounts and in the wrong areas.

He's like a guy that continues to pull the lever on a slot machine with the Orioles' money instead of playing a game of high stakes Texas Hold 'Em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not what AM is saying at all. He is saying he is not willing to give 7 figure bonuses to guys that have played less than a seasons worth of games at any level. IF you look at it objectively it makes sense. Imagine Keiron Pope in the DR, he is every bit the athlete any of the big bonus DR guys are. Do you think that it would make sense to give him that kind of money. AM is saying he will pay for the risk when it makes sense.

Here is a question for you where did Schoop come from? I see some international guys showing up at the low levels. The thing is any guy AM signed would be at best where Schoop is. If any segment is a place where it is too early to know how he is doing it would be this one. He is making value bets in this market, maybe he knows the size of his bankroll and knows he can't risk losing huge pots trying to hit a homerun every once in a while.

You have never heard me say we MUST sign a bunch of 7 figure dominican players.

Every once in a while, a Sano comes around that I think we should be bidding for but for the most part, I am not saying to do that.

Hoosiers has mentioned before that if we just spent another 2M or so on the INt'l side of things, then people would be happier...And you know what, he is absolutely right because 2M more dollars is probably anywhere from 5-15 new players into the organization.

They just aren't doing enough and there is zero intelligent justification for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"A lot of the signing bonuses that you are reading about for no doubt talented players that are signing with these other clubs for millions out of the Dominican, they are doing that without the benefit of playing games. That is a not a risk I am willing to take." he said.
The last bolded statement describes what is wrong with Andy MacPhail's philosophy.

In the AL East, where the Orioles get outspent by a large percentage, the Orioles need to take some risks. If we take the conservative route, the Yankees and Red Sox will beat us every single year because the Orioles are not going to beat the Yankees and Red Sox by paying the going rate for the top free agents with the highest WARPs.

So it sounds like MacPhail is happy to sign the likes of Wigginton, Izturis, Gonzalez, Greg, Lee, and Guerrero for 10's of millions of dollars annually because these guys are 'less risky' rather than spending the money on riskier, but higher upside international prospects.

The problem with this philosophy is that it is very unlikely that you are going to get the significant over-performance from players necessary to compete in the AL East from these type players. To compete in the AL East where you are getting outspent considerably, you are going to need more than a couple players who are big bargains compared to what you are paying them. That requires signing players with some risk associated with them.

The Orioles need a front office willing to take risks. C'mon Andy, we haven't had a winning season in 13 years. If the risks dont' pan out, can it really get much worse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miguel Sano - who could have been had for the cost of Garrett Atkins. Atkins was more risky.

MacPhail takes risks, but for smaller amounts and in the wrong areas.

And this is also a good point. Look at some of the horrible risks this team has taken with some of their FA signings. They can justify that but not justify getting into the Int'l market in a larger capacity?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles need a front office willing to take risks. C'mon Andy, we haven't had a winning season in 13 years. If the risks dont' pan out, can it really get much worse?

This is why no Orioles fan should want Andy MacPhail back.

At least if you change the messenger, there's a good chance PGA will be hearing a different tune about international spending...

Most GMs want to spend in that area now or better yet know they have to. MacPhail is very much in the minority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miguel Sano - who could have been had for the cost of Garrett Atkins. Atkins was more risky.

MacPhail takes risks, but for smaller amounts and in the wrong areas.

Only you would think that a 16 YO athlete is less risky than a 28 YO guy with 4 ML season with an OPS over 750 and one full season over 950. Where he should have spent the money is a valid question. But Sano's SO rate gives pause to consider AM's position. Even including his time in the DRSL he Ks 28% of the time. His numbers this season in the APPY league are only encouraging through the SSS glasses. Remember even Rowell tore up that league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only you would think that a 16 YO athlete is less risky than a 28 YO guy with 4 ML season with an OPS over 750 and one full season over 950. Where he should have spent the money is a valid question. But Sano's SO rate gives pause to consider AM's position. Even including his time in the DRSL he Ks 28% of the time. His numbers this season in the APPY league are only encouraging through the SSS glasses. Remember even Rowell tore up that league.

Atkins was on a serious decline and had little chance of even being league average...Yes, he was riskier than Sano.

And Sano could be used in a trade...He is depth...quality depth. One of the top 100 prospects in baseball heading into the season.

Just another example where the Orioles spent money poorly when they could have been smarter about it...But for some fans, they will always find the excuses for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...