Jump to content

10/3/2012: GAME 162 - Orioles at Rays


Don Quixote

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 865
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Adjustments are not the Orioles game. Hitting mistakes a long way is. When they do, they are successful. I'm completely convinced the Orioles hitters really don't have any control if a pitcher is on. They are not the kind of htters that make in game adjustments to what pitchers are do. They keep flailing until the guy makes a mistake. It won us 93 games o why change?

It's just maddening to watch when the games really matter, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more mad at the Rays. I can't stand them anymore. They are on the same level as Boston and New York to me now.

Tampa is doing what Baltimore did last year. Play out the games and play to win. I respect them for that they same way they respected us for doing it last year. We can still get this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny how the people who want to question Buck on using Saunders in the Wild Card instead of holding back Tillman don't recognize that such a move probably wouldn't have helped, considering how Tillman is pitching tonight.

I think what people were thinking is that Tillman gives you the better chance to win then Saunders, especially against a team like Texas. For ex., If you had Tillman make 10 starts against Texas and Saunders 10 starts against Texas, Tillman is more likely to pitch better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you're playing against the other 10th man - the Trop ground rules.

Yeah, this stadium totally sucks and that's why no one comes to their games. It's honestly an embarrassment to baseball, but both teams have to play there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. The Rays are playing the game exactly the way it should be played. Kind of like some team from Baltimore last year.

Yep, honestly, I bet the Rays appreciated us helping them get into the playoffs last year but I doubt they think, oh we'll just let them sneak into the playoffs this year becasue of that. These guys are competitive athletes after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are 2-5 vs. the rangers on the year. They outscored us 56-22 in those games. Our biggest margin of win was 2, theres was 11

Have you watched them sleepwalk since basically the all-star break though? They've lost like 4 consecutive series. They're clearly on the downswing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...