Jump to content

Matt Hobgood - is there hope? (No, there is not. Indy League bound.)


McLovin

Recommended Posts

Matzek is a great kid, sorry to hear he is having control issues. Hopefully, the staff will be able to solve any issues by refining mechanics.

Doesn't seem likely, or at least, they haven't made any progress since he was drafted. 6.2 BB/9 his first season; ballooned to 8.9 BB/9 the next year. Managed to get it down to a (still-unacceptable) 6.0 BB/9 in 2012, which is where he is so far this season (6.1). He is young-ish for his level (22 in AA this season), and gets plenty of Ks (9.4 MiL K/9), but no pitcher can get away with two walks every three innings - for reference, Jake Arrieta's MLB BB/9 is 4.0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 565
  • Created
  • Last Reply

He is 22 and fifth year since he was drafted and has only made it to Delmarva. Move him up to Frederick and see if he can still get people out. At this pace he will be 30 by the time he gets to triple A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is 22 and fifth year since he was drafted and has only made it to Delmarva. Move him up to Frederick and see if he can still get people out. At this pace he will be 30 by the time he gets to triple A

This is poor post. If he is 24 and still not salvageable I will agree. He says he is healthy for the first time since we drafted him. I am willing to see if he can be an asset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone give me a little context here? Does Hobgood have a chance to fine himself in Baltimore at any point in his career? Going to Faidley's doesn't count.

I'm glad he seems to be healthy, and while I know this was a sign ability pick at the time, he was still a very high selection with at least some decent upside. Is any of that still there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone give me a little context here? Does Hobgood have a chance to fine himself in Baltimore at any point in his career? Going to Faidley's doesn't count.

I'm glad he seems to be healthy, and while I know this was a sign ability pick at the time, he was still a very high selection with at least some decent upside. Is any of that still there?

Yes, there's some major upside here. He's still only 22 and looks great in person and on the stat sheet. The average age for pitchers in the SALL is 21.7.

He can make a career for himself if he stays healthy. He would be beating tremendous odds to return from such a serious shoulder injury though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He would be beating tremendous odds to return from such a serious shoulder injury though.

A "serious" shoulder injury would be a torn labrum or rotator cuff. His was only a loose shoulder capsule. Nothing close to either of those, and probably the least serious shoulder injury a pitcher could have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard the interview with RP the other day and he said Matt got it up to 95/96. Maybe the shoulder was the real issue and we'll see the prospect we thought we would.

I'd lay money down that they move in back to a starter either late this summer and NLT then year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A "serious" shoulder injury would be a torn labrum or rotator cuff. His was only a loose shoulder capsule. Nothing close to either of those, and probably the least serious shoulder injury a pitcher could have.

Ask Dan Klein about that. I STRONGLY disagree.

Also, Hobgood was misdiagnosed for a full season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Klein had a labrum issue, right?

Per SteveM

Right-hander Dan Klein, the Orioles' third-round draft pick in 2010 out of UCLA, will undergo another shoulder procedure and he will likely miss all of the 2012 season.

The rotator interval closure procedure will be performed by shoulder specialist Dr. Craig Morgan this Monday, April 16, in Wilmington, Del. It is expected to tighten the area around the shoulder capsule.

It is a very similar procedure that Dr. Morgan performed on Matt Hobgood on April 2. Hobgood is expected to miss all this season but said Dr. Morgan felt it was very reasonable for him to return by next March.

This will be the third procedure on that right shoulder over the last few years for Klein. He had surgery last Aug. 16 to repair a tear in his right labrum and loosen his shoulder capsule. He had arthroscopic surgery and took a redshirt year at UCLA in 2009.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As happens fairly frequently, I am confused by your post. What do you STRONGLY disagree with?

I strongly disagree that the shoulder surgery performed on Habgood was nothing close to a rotator cuff. It sure kept him out for long enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As happens fairly frequently, I am confused by your post. What do you STRONGLY disagree with?

I do not mean to confuse you. Dan Klein had the same surgery and is unable to play baseball. I know, Dan had other issues. But the last surgery evidently really did the trick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure Klein's surgery involved a torn labrum that had already been surgically repaired, along with loosening the capsule whereas Matt only had his capsule tightened up. A lot more at stake when the dreaded labrum is involved.

I do think you are correct with this. And I do hate labrum surgeries. So I agree with this. I did mean to say that any shoulder surgery which shuts a first round pick pitcher down for a year is serious to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I strongly disagree that the shoulder surgery performed on Habgood was nothing close to a rotator cuff. It sure kept him out for long enough.

I'm not sure where the confusion came from personally. I lump any shoulder surgery as serious, especially one where you seek out a specialist in Delaware and will keep you on the mend for 12-18 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure where the confusion came from personally. I lump any shoulder surgery as serious, especially one where you seek out a specialist in Delaware and will keep you on the mend for 12-18 months.

I think that is what RZNJ had hoped I would have said. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • OP is asking about next year as well as this one. I think the point is we can get a guy who will help us now and next year. We did expect to lose Bradish but not him and Means and Wells all at the same time. Right now we would be going into next year with Grayson as our only dependable guy. Won't be much margin for error without another Burnes type. 
    • Something to keep in mind in the offseason is that the starting pitcher FA market doesn’t look that great in terms of pitchers we would sign or even want to sign. On top of that, you have several guys who only become FA if they opt out and if they opt out, it’s likely because they didn’t have a great season. Combine that with the idea that our only 2 internal rotation candidates are Povich and McDermott, both of whom have exhibited a lot of issues with command and control and it certainly is a shaky long term outlook for the rotation. Position player wise, we will (in theory) lose Santander and McCann. Hays and Mullins are likely gone. Not going to have both Mateo and Urias but certainly could bring back one. As of now, OHearn definitely has his option picked up. If it were up to me, Mounty would be traded. 2 years left of control, likely to be coming off a very solid season and we have players behind him. He could help fetch us some pitching. My expectation is at least 2 of Mounty, OHearn and Santander will be back. How so many of these guys and our prospects end the year will determine how we attack the offseason. But for the deadline, I think obtaining a starter that can be here long term is something the team should look at.     You have several options in Miami and potentially a guy like Detmers.    A Detmers/Estevez package is something I would be looking into.  Same thing with Nardi and one of the Marlins starters, like a Braxton Garrett for example. For me, the key here is that you need to upgrade the pen. I think if you make the pen really good and you have Burnes and GRod, that may be enough.    In not trading our top 3 prospects. I think all play big roles in 2025, although Basallo may not play a role until the season is well underway, But I would trade Kjerstad and anyone else while hoping to keep certain guys although they wouldn’t be deal breakers.  
    • And Fangraphs has the Yankees 68% to 31% to win the division.
    • Would a package including Kjerstad and Norby (possibly Stowers too) be able to get us Sonny Gray and Helsley? STL has to at some point come to a conclusion that they don't have enough to legit compete for a World Series this year or the next few projectable years. This would give them an infusion of young talent and get Gray off of their books. That's 3 young controllable starting position players for their #1 and closer. I'm not sure what the value proposition is there. But this is the kind of trade that I would be looking to make and I think it helps both ball clubs.
    • Pitching injuries are happening to a crazy degree all over the sport. We still have our #1 starter who is the best starter that we have had in decades and a very talented #2/3. All is not lost.
    • Just another argument for roboumps
    • There will be FAs (none admittedly as good as Burnes) that we can sign. We have a ridiculously low payroll and aren't paying anyone.  We are not going to maintain excellence long term by only using the draft and trades to meaningfully add talent. We are going to have to use the free agent market (wisely) too.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...