Jump to content

Matt Hobgood - is there hope? (No, there is not. Indy League bound.)


McLovin

Recommended Posts

Well hard to get 5% now but dooable.

He wouldn't have kept $2.42M though with taxes.

Probably more like $1.5 million but invested conservatively at such a young age, he can do as you say, whatever he wants.

Maybe Joe Jordan is getting a cut....

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Look, I despised the pick, go check the thread from that night, I was seriously unhappy.

But that sort of thing is uncalled for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 565
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Well hard to get 5% now but dooable.

He wouldn't have kept $2.42M though with taxes.

Probably more like $1.5 million but invested conservatively at such a young age, he can do as you say, whatever he wants.

Maybe Joe Jordan is getting a cut....

Oh yea, so halve that. I guess you can get by on $60k a year in a lot of places. But he'll need to find a job to supplement that. And that's if he really has anything left of it after being a 22-year-old guy with $1.5M in the bank. And the Jordan thing was a cheap shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, I despised the pick, go check the thread from that night, I was seriously unhappy.

But that sort of thing is uncalled for.

Fine, I apologize to you. Are you Joe Jordan's son?

Nobody had this guy anywhere near where he was taken. People defended it at first but...

You don't think certain scouts (that eventually become directors) get to close to certain players that can blind their judgement?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine, I apologize to you. Are you Joe Jordan's son?

Nobody had this guy anywhere near where he was taken. People defended it at first but...

You don't think certain scouts (that eventually become directors) get to close to certain players that can blind their judgement?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You accused him of taking a kick-back.

My view, the one that I had from day one, is that Joe got caught up in a good story and made a bad decision.

No reason to accuse him of anything more then bad judgement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody had this guy anywhere near where he was taken. People defended it at first but...

You don't think certain scouts (that eventually become directors) get to close to certain players that can blind their judgement?

I don't think many people outside of the organization liked the pick. The consensus here was that it was at least a reach, and maybe a ridiculous reach. But I think a lot of external sources had Hobgood going in the 15-20 range. It's not necessarily that crazy to take a consensus #15 at #5. In any case, that was a crappy draft class. Lots of teams got zero value out of their first rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You accused him of taking a kick-back.

My view, the one that I had from day one, is that Joe got caught up in a good story and made a bad decision.

No reason to accuse him of anything more then bad judgement.

Corn: I was joking. I really didn't think that. My point is maybe he did since it was an extreme reach:) Come on now, I don't think Jordan would do that.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corn: I was joking. I really didn't think that. My point is maybe he did since it was an extreme reach:) Come on now, I don't think Jordan would do that.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I for one find it amazing still that some overweight out of shape high school fkid who happens to be able to hit 90 mph on Radar gun can fool some professional scouts enough to parlay that into over 2 million clams! Most people will be lucky to make anywhere close to that in a lifetime of daily grind and stress. So more power to him for being so lucky monetarily at least. He and Billy Rowell ought to form a partnership and invest their jackpots they got by luck. Maybe they could form a band with their main song:Money For Nothing Checks For Free!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this was all part of the Hobgood selection. It's not that Jordan didn't like any of the other guys that were available, he just thought they all had some red flags. If they all had the same price tag, I'm pretty sure Hobgood would not have been that pick, but I could be wrong. At the end of the day, if he had Hobgood rated about equal as Matzek and Wheeler, why would he pay the premium price for the other two. He figured he could get Hobgood, Coffey and Ohlman for the price of Wheeler or Matzek. Now obviously things have not worked out, but from a scouting director's perspective, I can certainly understand where Jordan was coming from. He just didn't think Matzek and Wheeler were worth the premium price they were asking (they were asking for much more than they eventually got).

As the scouting director and the man in charge, Jordan is ultimately responsible for the success or failure of each draft class. The story has not been totally written yet on that draft class but to me, the logic was sound.

I just wanted to bump this post since not everyone knows the full story. Obviously both Wheeler and Matzek became major league pitchers and none of the three Jordan went for probably will (Ohlman still has a chance I guess). Both Wheeler and Matzek had very unreasonable contract demands that they came off, but Jordan had concerns that he could sign either of them with his budget.

I'll admit the Hobgood selection was a serious reach, but I can understand his logic of getting three guys he liked for the same price as what he thought it would cost to get Matzek or Wheeler.

The problem is that Jordan, who I like and respect as a baseball man and scout, if he had one weakness as as a scouting director is that he tended to take too many chances on small sample guys or guys who played multiple sports and never dedicated themselves to baseball thinking that once they did they would excel because of the tools. He loved those pitchers with spikes in velocity (Coffey and Hobgood) their senior year but what I think everyone has learned now is those guys are major injury risks or possible PED users since there is no testing in highschool.

Amateur scouting director is one of the hardest jobs in baseball in my opinion because of the vast number of potential players, a limited scouting staff, and the fact that players have mostly been tested against inferior competition and the only way to truly know is when they eventually get a chance to be tested against major league quality players (if they get the far).

Sure it's easy to sit here and say players are reaches and they should have picked this guy over that guy, but at the end of the day, even consensus top picks fail and fail often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You probably think The D-Rays do a pretty good job at drafting, right? Here's their 2009 draft as well:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?query_type=franch_year&team_ID=TBD&year_ID=2009&draft_type=junreg&

Red Sox?

http://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?query_type=franch_year&team_ID=BOS&year_ID=2009&draft_type=junreg&

A few teams like the Blue Jays and Cardinals did pretty well, but it was a tough draft year. It happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You probably think The D-Rays do a pretty good job at drafting, right? Here's their 2009 draft as well:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?query_type=franch_year&team_ID=TBD&year_ID=2009&draft_type=junreg&

Red Sox?

http://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?query_type=franch_year&team_ID=BOS&year_ID=2009&draft_type=junreg&

A few teams like the Blue Jays and Cardinals did pretty well, but it was a tough draft year. It happens.

Heaney would have been an ok pick. If they had been able to sign him...

Miles Head was supposedly good...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If you count the Tigers in that “8 sellers” group, Skubal is much better than a #3. He is a #1 on most teams, but wouldn’t need to be on ours this season. But could fill that role next and beyond. If the Orioles are following the Astros model and don’t intend to buy SP in FA. He is the kind of move that you would make, given that he is the kind of difference-making SP talent that can tilt any postseason series in your favor (think when the Astros acquired Gerrit Cole).
    • Of course….like I said, there are good players there but if I’m the Os, if this is his best case scenario (and certainly not most likely scenario), I don’t feel too bad about trading him for a true difference making talent. Kjerstad is the guy that you really have to think about.  His value is strong imo, both if we keep Him or if he’s traded.   But ultimately, how do you view him? Is he a player capable of being good enough in the OF? Is he a platoon guy or do you feel he hits lefties as well?    I said this the other day but I think his power is better than any tool Cowser has but that Cowser is the better all around player.  I don’t see the Os trading Cowser because of how they value defense. And it’s not that you have to choose between these guys and Kjerstad doesn’t have to be a GGer to be valuable in the OF but you do have to get guys to help this year and while we should be able to do that without trading any of the top guys, what if we can’t? Do you forgo your best chance to upgrade the team because you don’t want to lose Kjerstad?    I think they keep him and get done what they need to get done but this question will carry on into the offseason and you will now be fully introducing Mayo and Holliday into the conversation and Basallo will be quickly coming behind them and his bat will impact the playing time of Kjerstad, just as Mayo’s could as well. It’s a fascinating puzzle that Elias has to put together and he has to do it while also building a pitching staff that will be in pretty mediocre situation heading into the offseason.
    • Maybe Carlos Lee lite or something
    • Beyond Young, Luis Gonzalez and Kade Strowd have outside chance to be added. Most likely, that would be in the context of a call up later this year.
    • Oh, gotcha. Thanks for the clarification. Yeah I could see the Yankees continuing to free fall. In those first two months, they were playing well beyond what their true talent suggests. The addition of Stroman was a good one for them and of course Soto is great. But adding just those two (especially given other declining players like Rizzo) should not improve your team by over 20 games (which is what they were on pace for). I in no way, see the Red Sox being able to win enough games to truly challenge us for the division. There is too much of a significant gap between the two teams offensively. The Red Sox could win 90ish games (which would be superb for them). But given that we’ve lost what 5/6 series all year? I can’t see us winning under high 90’s to low 100’s. We just don’t lose enough games for the Red Sox to ever really threaten us/catch up.
    • Don Baylor: MVP, all star, 3 time silver slugger, 28.7 bWAR, 338 HRs, career OPS+ = 118 Nelson Cruz: 7 time all star, 4 time silver slugger, 42.1 bWAR, 464 HRs, career OPS+ = 130 Bobby Bonilla: 6 time all star, 3 time silver slugger, 30.2 bWAR, 287 HRs, career OPS+ = 124   If I'm Heston Kjerstad, I'd take any one of those careers and be tremendously thankful. 
    • My issue with Crochet is the uncertainty of how much he will be able to pitch with his innings issues this year.     How many innings can he pitch in 2025 as well?    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...