Jump to content

Chris Davis Count Down


sevastras

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 355
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It's not bogus, it's invalid. The man who set the record cheated.

Bond's didn't really cheat as they weren't testing for Steroids when he broke the record. He wasn't caught using steroids that season. So the record is perfectly valid. You might not like it but the record is what it is. For all we know Maris was using a corked bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup...and if he wants to discredit Bonds, Sosa, and McGwire for steroids, we might as well discredit Maris' record since he had an extra 8 games to break Ruth's record.

For that matter how do we know Maris didn't use steroids? Or Ruth for that matter? We know Ruth tried to use testosterone.

It's nonsense, testosterone has been part of the game since the 19th century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bond's didn't really cheat as they weren't testing for Steroids when he broke the record. He wasn't caught using steroids that season. So the record is perfectly valid. You might not like it but the record is what it is. For all we know Maris was using a corked bat.

He didn't get in trouble for cheating. He cheated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Success is success regardless of steroids.

Pretty sure Maris used Speed, and like I said before I haven't seen evidence proving Maris didn't use testosterone.

I find it simultaneously amusing and maddening that a segment of the anti-steroid crowd has no issue at all with amphetamines.

Hint, it's a drug that enhanced performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He would be the first to break the record without cheating/injecting steroids. That really means nothing to you?

This isn't an emotional issue, so what I feel about someone's numbers really doesn't matter. MLB accepts Bonds' totals as canon.

And if somebody cheated you'd say that wasn't fair. Why is the record 73 Home Runs? It's because he cheated.

Bonds has never tested positive nor proven in a court of law to have broken any rule by Major League Baseball. There is plenty of circumstantial evidence and many fans can do the simple math of adding 2 and 2 together. But in debates, you need facts not conjecture.

For those that think 73 was tainted, the facts simply aren't there.

And the fact is - most people consider 73 to be a bogus record.

Again, I can consider Mike Devereaux to be the greatest fielding OF in the history of the game. But it doesn't matter what I consider. The facts tell me otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't an emotional issue, so what I feel about someone's numbers really doesn't matter. MLB accepts Bonds' totals as canon.

Bonds has never tested positive nor proven in a court of law to have broken any rule by Major League Baseball. There is plenty of circumstantial evidence and many fans can do the simple math of adding 2 and 2 together. But in debates, you need facts not conjecture.

For those that think 73 was tainted, the facts simply aren't there.

Again, I can consider Mike Devereaux to be the greatest fielding OF in the history of the game. But it doesn't matter what I consider. The facts tell me otherwise.

Wait, Devo was the greatest fielder, but Orsulak had the greatest arm. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • It's pretty hard to say definitively that the bolded is true.  It might be, but there's also the loss in ability you have to account for.  30 year olds are slower than 26 year olds too.  Maybe their game knowledge and practice have made it so they can overcome the meager loss in bat speed/athleticism over that time span.  But the picture is a bit muddy.   I also don't think the aging issue is limited to people in their mid-late 30s.  Bat speed peaks at like 24 or 25 based on the data we have right now on it, and after 31 starts falling off fairly fast.  Obviously this is population data and individuals are likely to see different curves.   But outside of the stars that have a lot of ability to lose, it's becoming pretty clear that once you hit your early 30s it's pretty hard to maintain your skills without all the "help" that is extensively tested for.   I think that even for early-30s players teams are much more willing to drop them over giving them expensive market-rate deals, especially since they can abuse young talent so readily.
    • After a really dumb day at work, this was an absolutely delightful read. Seeing a diamond expert and a can of corn detonate a yoked PBA pro was absolutely wonderful. I love this website. 
    • If you pitch Bradish on 5 days rest you'd pitch Rodriguez on 3 days rest?
    • I think if you look at it draft by draft most years Elias did not have a chance to take a pitcher early. 2019 was Adley/Witt, 2020 everyone wanted Austin Martin SS over Kjerstad, 2021 it was Cowser or a few high school SS, and 2022 it was 5 position players at the top of the draft. I think Asa Lacy or Max Meyer were the only pitchers we could have possibly taken up until last year. 
    • Damn I wish I was that guy
    • Crochet had a monstrous game tonight. 7 IP 2 H 1 ER 2 BB 13 Ks I would love to have him even if it meant moving him to the bullpen for the final stretch but someone is gonna drastically overpay for him with top of rotation potential and 2x additional seasons of club control.    assuming it starts with Mayo, Kjerstad, Povich etc 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...