Jump to content

Punk move


bradyrocks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Hunter was having command issues. He was lucky the single he gave up wasn't a HR. I'm fine with Buck's decision.

Was there no one else he could have brought in? Regardless of how you feel about JJ's performance this season, I think it's fair to say he's been used too often. His appearance tonight was not necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there would be a different tone if Jim continued his normal ways tonight and blew it all

He's saved, what, 31 out of 37? I'd say his normal ways would be to get the save (perhaps while making it interesting). It's certainly not to blow it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you are correct - I still would not call this a punk move - more along the line of Can of Corn saying that it was just a manager getting his closer a save.

Buck believes in the Save Rule and not the Win Rule. Or is it the other way around? Whatever. Buck seems a little hypocritical with Johnson.

Because I can remember Buck doing this commercial about three years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's saved, what, 31 out of 37? I'd say his normal ways would be to get the save (perhaps while making it interesting). It's certainly not to blow it all.

Your point is correct.

Defenses of JJ still make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up, though. The guy's on pace for 55 saves. Wonderful. He's also on pace for 10 blown saves and 12 losses. 12.

Yep, sure love seeing him come into games...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really the economics I'm worried about, when closers get money in their arbitration years based on saves, you are basically paying by the save... so you have to ask yourself if it's worth it when a guy is brought in in a situation like this. It might not make a difference but if he ends the year with 50 saves versus 49 saves that could be forty billion dollars or however the math works in MLBPAworld.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your point is correct.

Defenses of JJ still make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up, though. The guy's on pace for 55 saves. Wonderful. He's also on pace for 10 blown saves and 12 losses. 12.

Yep, sure love seeing him come into games...

I agree with this sentiment, although I am not sure the end results would be any different with some other "no closer" oriented use of pitchers. This game is an example; it seemed like we were only 4 to five different pitches from our various relievers away from it being a 10-8 Toronto win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your point is correct.

Defenses of JJ still make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up, though. The guy's on pace for 55 saves. Wonderful. He's also on pace for 10 blown saves and 12 losses. 12.

Yep, sure love seeing him come into games...

That's it. Because all of you trying to draw comparisons to Hunter and Johnson are missing a really big point. Hunter has been the better pitcher.

And does anyone else feel like I did, that even though he gave up a couple there I would have been comfortable leaving him in based on how he's pitched this year. I can't say the same for Johnson almost every time he comes in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really the economics I'm worried about, when closers get money in their arbitration years based on saves, you are basically paying by the save... so you have to ask yourself if it's worth it when a guy is brought in in a situation like this. It might not make a difference but if he ends the year with 50 saves versus 49 saves that could be forty billion dollars or however the math works in MLBPAworld.

Another reason NOT to have one guy getting all the saves.

Economics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This wasn't a save situation. No amount of arguing is going to convince me. This is one of the times a save really isn't a save. But it was nice to see Tillman buckle up and get through the 6th on 108 pitches. Next time, stretch him out to 115.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, a punk in Shakespeare's time was a prostitute, and according to some friends of mine who spent some time incarcerated, it means that as well, in jail, although not necessarily a willing one.....:scratchchinhmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...to pull your best reliever of the season, when he gives up a couple runs in a ballgame well in hand, with one out left, for the guy who has had every opportunity and blown it.

I understand Buck being loyal to his guys (JJ), sometimes to a fault...but thats pretty disrespectful to your best guy, to not trust him for one more out there, just because theres an opportunity to pad Jims stats. Tommy being pissed is justified.

Also, pretty obvious in the first pitch of that at bat to Lind, that he needed a changeup in there somewhere. That stuff happens, but Tommy or Matt need to read that swing.

Great game, but Buck, comeon man...whats your deal with Jim?

If he gets Reyes or Encarncion or Lind out or doesn't give up two runs, he finishes the game. Have absolutely no problem with Buck pulling him. I'd have done the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • When he first came up, his slider was very mediocre and only really used as a get me over change of pace. Now it seems like a weapon. I wonder if he went to school with Professor Bradish for that.
    • Yeah, kinda why I asked the question. That seems real lofty for a comparison.
    • After a really disappointing April that saw his ERA balloon to 7.78, Alex Pham has found his bearings in May, allowing 3 ER in 14.1 IP, allowing 8 hits and 4 walks while striking out 17.   Yesterday Pham allowed a run on 2 hits and a walk in 4.2 innings, striking out 7.   53 of 72 pitches were strikes.  The sole run charged to Pham scored when reliever Kyle Virbitsky allowed a 2-out double to the first batter he faced after relieving Pham in the fifth.    Due to the poor start, Pham’s ERA still rests at an unimpressive 5.29, but he’s definitely been headed in the right direction.  Also, he’s struck out 40 batters in 34 innings.     
    • I can’t emphasize enough how stupid that rain delay was.  No rain at all for 45 minutes, then two hours of light mist, the kind that teams play through all the time.  I was standing near the kids play area during most of the delay and believe me, that rain didn’t deter any kids from using the playground equipment for two hours. Then, 15 minutes before the game is going to start, the grounds crew is watering the infield.  What? The game itself was not worth the wait, needless to say.   But what annoys me most is the complete lack of communication during these delays.  How about letting the fans who are there know what the thinking is about how long the delay will be?  How about an update every 30 minutes or so.   Nope, nothing.   Just a generic message on the scoreboard saying that the start of the game will be delayed to to the “threat” of inclement weather.   My phone was showing .05” of rain expected in the next six hours.  Some threat! On the bright side, the team did announce that ticket holders would be given vouchers that could be used for a Monday - Thursday game.  That was the least they could do.       
    • 19,286 for that rain-delayed mess of a game.  I’d say about 2/3 of those stuck through the 3 hour delay and were in their seats at game time.  
    • And paid Scherzer, and Zimmerman, and Corbin, and Werth.   They didn’t all work out, but nobody could say the Nats didn’t spend to put a winning team on the field during their run.  The run basically ended because Stras II and Corbin blew up in their face.   But there’s always 2019.   
    • I can’t believe that 8 hours after Grayson stepped off the mound, I’m the first person to update his thread.   After a 19-day IL stint and without a rehab stint, Grayson threw 6 innings of one-hit shutout ball last night.  The one hit was an infield squibber hit 59.5 mph off the bat.  His command was a tad shaky at times, as he walked three and hit a batter, but he still breezed through 6 innings on 82 pitches, 50 for strikes.  If it hadn’t been his first outing in three weeks, he certainly could have pitched the 7th inning.  Unfortunately, the bullpen blew it for him. Fastball topped out at 98.4 and he was still hitting 97 in his final inning.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...