Jump to content

I don't think the way we are winning is sustainable


brianod

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

On one hand I agree, but at the same time there's nothing that the offense is doing right now that I haven't known for three years now. They're streaky, at times frustrating, and at times down right horrid. They're also capable of beating the ever loving crap out of the opposition and carrying the team for weeks on end. Nothing about that is new, we've known it since 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ Happ retired 14 in a row and achieved a strikeout high for him. Bullpen came in and retired three in a row. So, needing an insurance run, we went 0-17. If we want to go far in the playoffs, or even make the playoffs, our O has got to get better.

J.A Happ is a half decent pitcher. We are 1st in HR, 10th in runs scored and 8th in hits, 6th in slugging and 11th in OPS....not the best offense in the league but not an incapable one by a long shot. Its 162 games and taking any one game or small sample and trying to draw conclusions from it is just shortsighted.

I agree it would be nice to see the bats break out in a big way but my point remains ....we have faced some of the best pitchers in baseball in this 31 game stretch and I agree we have struggled offensively but what else do you expect that has a basis in reality? Good pitchers will hold down good bats...that's why they are good. Right now our pitchers are matching up very well and doing enough to win games for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The offense may be down, but the pitching has been up and I don't think we should be considered over the long haul. Yes, they may regress, but you also have to remember that many of the pitchers credited Dave Wallace and the accountability amongst the starters as a big reason as to why they pitched well over the past two months.

All of our starters have sub-4 ERAs (except for Ubaldo), which is enough for us down the stretch in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FanGraphs projects us to regress to a .500 team and still taking the division by 4 games. And more wins than any other team competing for the second wild card. 78% playoff chances. When you have a 5-game lead in a mediocre division you have a cushion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Birds are 65-49, with 48 games left, if they play .500 ball, that is 89 wins, most likely with the Division. If they play .555 ball (which would be a slight regression off of the .570 ball they are currently playing), that is 92 wins for the division and perhaps home field, playing the Wild Card. Color me punch drunk, but I like our odds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you have a 5-game lead in a mediocre division you have a cushion.

Mediocre compared to who? The NL Central maybe. That might have been true a third of the way through the season, but I don't think that the AL East is mediocre...not great maybe, but no longer "weak" or "mediocre".

We know what we've done. Toronto would be 2nd by a similar amount in almost every other division. Our 3rd place team just rolled Detroit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...