Jump to content

vs. RAYS, 8/26


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 814
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Or the best, depending on how snakebitten your team is. We've won 52% of our challenges when Buck challenged a play. When other managers challenge against a call that went the Orioles' way, 56% of those are not overturned.

To put it another way: the Orioles have been one party (the challenger, or the challenged) in 50 separate occasions (including the one just now). Out of those 50 challenges, 27 of them resulted in a decision favoring the O's. Only 23 of them came back to bite us.

If we assume that a 50/50 challenge win percentage means that you may as well not have the replay system at all, and each challenge becomes a deciding factor in a game to determine whether they won or lost (this is not always the case, but it often is), this means we'd be something like 4 games ahead of the Yanks instead of 6 if the replay system didn't exist, assuming that we lost all the games where the original call was wrong and harmed us, and won all the games where the original call went in our favor.

These stats are a bit wonky and not very reliable for several objective reasons, so I won't belabor the point -- but basically, we're doing a little better than we would "ordinarily" have been expected to do given how umpires treat us.

However, the video replay system -- or at least the human beings watching the video -- seems to be very heavily bias towards the place where they work. The MFYs have won 80% of their challenges when Girardi challenges. A slight counterbalance is that, when someone challenges the MFYs, they get a 54% overturn rate, which means the Yankees get slightly screwed when other managers challenge a play that originally favored the Yankees. But Girardi's charm more than makes up for that when he challenges a call that favored a Yankees opponent.

I don't think the Girardi thing will be sustainable; there will likely be some hoopla about it in the press at some point, maybe during the offseason when we aren't worried about more pressing matters like the playoffs. The umps may have to figure out how to remove their New York biases.

Overall, it's much better for the game when calls are made correctly. There's nothing worse than having a blown call replace good athleticism and skill. We of all fanbases should know that, we who got screwed by the obvious fan interference of Jeffrey Maier.

Even when the umps overturn a call in a way that is bad for the Orioles, I still would rather the replay system exist than not exist. It needs to be improved, the time needs to be shortened, and biases removed, but it's a fundamentally sound idea that will make the game less about some old fart's bad vision and more about the players' abilities.

So it will be more about old fart seniority umpires in NY's biases than the umpire's calls on the field. Not to mention the inevitable delays and the already stupid pseudostrategy that has evolved...Does the manager challenge or not? Let me stand out here next to the umpire while my video guy tells me what to do. What is the video guy on my team signalling? Can I save my challenge by getting a bogus crew chief call? Is it the eighth inning, I have used up my challenge and now it doesnt matter if the call is right or not because I don't get a challenge. Hey, the technology is down again, can somebody wake up NY? I hate the challenges in football and I detest them in baseball.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Taking an off day to take a look at how the schedule looks the rest of the way.   We know a little bit more about the talent of various teams now than we did at the start of the season, but it's a marathon so there is still a lot we can't be sure of. Breaking the schedule the remainder of the way into sections: First, the Orioles are home for 12 of the next 18 games over 22 days starting today, and have three days off in that span.  And 12 of the 18 games are vs teams with losing records, while the others are against teams who are 19-18 and 20-18 at the moment.   So the Orioles have a chance to continue to build wins and continue that .600+ play during this favorable stretch.   Then, of course, there is June.  There has been much talk of June already.  There is only one off day in the 30 day month.   We also play May 31, so that is a stretch of 30 games in 31 days between May 31 and June 30.     And of those 30 games... 24 are against playoff teams from last year!   And the 6 that aren't are against Cleveland and Yankees, who have the 2nd and 3rd best records in the AL this year!   This is why we need to keep banking wins and getting further over .500, because June looks like a real challenge.   But does it get easier when June ends?   Well, certainly the grind does.   In the next two months (I'll call  July 1 to Sept 1, a 63 day span that ends on a Sunday, the next two months)... the Orioles have 10 days off.   Of course 4 are the All Star Break.   But at least there are some breathers for the pitching staff.   But in those 63 days, the Orioles only play 22 home games.   There are two 6-game West Coast trips (counting Colorado as West Coast), a 10 game Cle/Tor/TB swing, and a Tex/Mia swing in the heat of August.   So while June lacks days off, July and August have a lot more travel and a lot less home cooking.   Labor Day then begins a 3 week stretch, with 3 off days, 12 home games, and 6 road games, all against teams that are currently no better than 1 game over .500.   So it is similar to our current stretch.   If we are near the top of the division when Labor Day hits, this will give us an opportunity to take control of the division.   The last week of the season is spent on the road, potentially against two teams we could be competing with for playoff seeds... the Twins and Yankees.   Those games could be huge.  
    • Man this is a tough one.  Yes you could trade for a elite stud who may, or may not put you over the top.  But do you give up a potential stud and a cheap replacement like a Heston K or a younger guy for the next 5 years? This is why Elias gets paid the big bucks.    I fully admit that Miller looks completely and utterly awesome.
    • Yep.  That's something I would find a way to back up on iCloud if possible.
    • I have no problem being contrarian, but this one is too early/soon for me. Hays can at least be our 2nd best defensive OF. 
    • This is a bench position for sure. The Milkman is the starting LF now. Career wRC+ vs LHP: Hays - 111 McKenna - 82 McKenna is a better defender by the fielding stats, but I don't trust him. He's a goofball. The starting OF defense is strong anyway so we're not desperate for a defensive replacement.
    • I agree and honestly at least some of this is imo just a result of age.  He is a youngster and as such he lacks the experience dealing with MLB pitching at an elite level.    Only thing that can help that is experience and aging.....like a fine wine.    Same with an NFL QB or WR when drafted.  Most struggle as rookies but the talented ones learn and get better just through the aging process.   Which this is totally OT but take Anthony Richardson this year in your fantasy leagues.  IF, big if, he doesn't get hurt....he is going to have a season that few have ever seen in the NFL imo. 
    • I'm  surprised they weren't tossing around ideas how Cashman could steal him for the Yankees.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...