Jump to content

J.J. Hardy would like to stay, but 'everything changes' in free agency


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply
No but another offer is usually made:)

Calm down man:) No need to get upset.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Who said I'm upset. You want me to applaud you for something I don't agree with?

I'm not a GM but from what I have heard it doesn't work that way. There are generally no actual "offers" to start with. The GM contacts the agent and gets some general parameters/framework of a deal. If there is something to work, then they begin negotiations and make offers. If there is nothing to work with, there are no negotiations. It ends there because it would be a waste of time. They keep in contact and see if the demands have gone down. Hardy's agent isn't likely going to lower his demands closer to free agency in a good year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our GM has handled the Hardy situation very well to this point. I think it would have been a mistake to give out a multi-year contract before the season without seeing if there were any deterioration in Hardy's defensive game. Also, I think these negotiations that might occur before or during a season can go wrong and create more bad blood - like the Mussina negotiations a long time ago. JJ has been on a bargain contract and is unlikely to be so kind in negotiations this time around - which I think is an important reason for the Os negotiating stance since most any offer we would make to him would likely be considered a lowball offer.

Better to assess JJ's season, let other teams set a market for him, and then decide what to do.

Hardy is a crucial part of the current team, but I am not eager to hold onto an older SS as he heads toward his mid-30s when things can go downhill quickly. I am sure JJ likes playing in Bmore for his current manager and the current group of guys. Despite this, I expect I will prefer to let JJ go and take the draft pick associated with a QO when it gets to that stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before the season began, I thought JJ was worth the same as Perahlta, 4 years-52 million. He has had a down year with power, committed more errors than last year and has had back problems this year, a sign of getting older. I no longer think he is worth 13 million per year and/or definitely not for 4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd call a 3.5 WAR pretty good. I do think think teams will be wary of his injury issues. .

The Yankees won't. There team is one big ambulance squad.

It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree, but you seemed confrontational in your reply. No worries.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Yankees won't. There team is one big ambulance squad.

It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree, but you seemed confrontational in your reply. No worries.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yup. Like I said earlier, I won't be surprised to see the Yankees offer him a 4/60 type of deal. No way the O's will match that...nor should they.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, we should have just paid pay him whatever his agent wanted I guess.

Do you really not understand the concept of too far apart?

It would be nice to hear some specifics. Did they actually exchange offers/demands?

Hardy on April 21:

"I don't know. I don't know what to say because no matter what I say it's going to cause some controversy, a story that I really don't want to get involved with right now," Hardy told CSNBaltimore.com. "There's been no talk. There was going to be talk, and then there wasn't. That's kind of the way it's been left."

After coming to the O's from the Minnesota Twins, Hardy inked a three-year contract extension with Baltimore and wants to stay.

"It just makes me curious. I don't understand what happened within the month or two that there was going to be talk, and all of a sudden there's not. It just makes me curious," Hardy said.

http://m.espn.go.com/mlb/story?storyId=10814449&src=desktop

That doesn't sound like talks had occurred where the parties were far apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be nice to hear some specifics. Did they actually exchange offers/demands?

Hardy on April 21:

http://m.espn.go.com/mlb/story?storyId=10814449&src=desktop

That doesn't sound like talks had occurred where the parties were far apart.

This may be a matter of semantics. The O's might have discussed what Hardy was looking for with his agent, and, hearing that, may have decided to wait. Given Hardy's injury concerns and relative lack of power this season, I'm not at all sorry that they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's need to resign Hardy...

The O's need to have 2 players that will usually be standing between 2nd base and 3rd base. One will be closer to 2nd and the other will be closer to 3rd. One of them does not "need" to be JJ Hardy. I lean on the "make a qualifying offer" side of the equation. It meets the short term "need" if he accepts and doesn't create a long-term risk. Granted, he probably won't accept, so DD will have to be creative to find that player to stand closer to 2nd base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...