Jump to content

Markakis on 2nd, 1 out, Jones at the plate....


HobCreek

Recommended Posts

Ted Williams knew more about hitting than any one who ever lived.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Teddy Ballgame had exceptional natural skills as well as his "science". No doubt he was helpful to other elite hitters like Tony Gwynn and Yaz. But not every player has the skill set to employ his science IMO. I think Presley is good at getting the most out of what a player has. Not every O has an aggressive approach. But given their skill set most of them benefit from that approach. I don't think Ted Williams could make Jones a better hitter. He is what he is IMO. As Presley says he could take more walks and hit less HR. Is that really desirable?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Teddy Ballgame had exceptional natural skills as well as his "science". No doubt he was helpful to other elite hitters like Tony Gwynn and Yaz. But not every player has the skill set to employ his science IMO. I think Presley is good at getting the most out of what a player has. Not every O has an aggressive approach. But given their skill set most of them benefit from that approach. I don't think Ted Williams could make Jones a better hitter. He is what he is IMO. As Presley says he could take more walks and hit less HR. Is that really desirable?

Oh I agree. Modern players and Ted Williams are not a match. Major league millionaires are of the belief that they know themselves best and are not really instructed, more like having a therapist as coach to listen to you, give you logistical support with film, etc, support your decisions, etc. I don't agree that Adam would hit less homers if he were more selective, i.e. more walks. I think Frank Robby and Eddie Murray would have hit fewer homeruns if they swung at as many bad pitches as Adam does and pitchers knew for a fact that they could likely get them out with pitches out of the zone. I think Adam going from 19 walks to 60-70 would likely increase his homers. It would be useful to know how many of his 130 strikeouts were on pitches out of the strike zone.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I agree. Modern players and Ted Williams are not a match. Major league millionaires are of the belief that they know themselves best and are not really instructed, more like having a therapist as coach to listen to you, give you logistical support with film, etc, support your decisions, etc. I don't agree that Adam would hit less homers if he were more selective, i.e. more walks. I think Frank Robby and Eddie Murray would have hit fewer homeruns if they swung at as many bad pitches as Adam does and pitchers knew for a fact that they could likely get them out with pitches out of the zone. I think Adam going from 19 walks to 60-70 would likely increase his homers. It would be useful to know how many of his 130 strikeouts were on pitches out of the strike zone.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I haven't bothered to check this season but historically Jones' OPS goes down the deeper into the count he gets. This is true even if he is ahead in the count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You ever read the Book Of Five Rings?

"Know the smallest things and the biggest things, the shallowest things and the deepest things. As if it were a straight road mapped out on the ground ... These things cannot be explained in detail. From one thing, know ten thousand things. When you attain the Way of strategy there will not be one thing you cannot see. You must study hard."

Ted Williams started the modern theory of bat speed as the most important part of power generation. He talked about reducing his bat weight where previously very heavy bats were believed essential for power. He would bake his bats and keep them in drying containers. He was the first hitter to ever use batting gloves and to use pine tar to improve grip.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I agree. Modern players and Ted Williams are not a match. Major league millionaires are of the belief that they know themselves best and are not really instructed, more like having a therapist as coach to listen to you, give you logistical support with film, etc, support your decisions, etc. I don't agree that Adam would hit less homers if he were more selective, i.e. more walks. I think Frank Robby and Eddie Murray would have hit fewer homeruns if they swung at as many bad pitches as Adam does and pitchers knew for a fact that they could likely get them out with pitches out of the zone. I think Adam going from 19 walks to 60-70 would likely increase his homers. It would be useful to know how many of his 130 strikeouts were on pitches out of the strike zone.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I think if Adam walked 80 times he would hit 15 homers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't bothered to check this season but historically Jones' OPS goes down the deeper into the count he gets. This is true even if he is ahead in the count.

Does he do better on 2-0 counts vs. 1-1 and 0-2 counts or is it just the absolute number of pitches that he sees?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Know the smallest things and the biggest things, the shallowest things and the deepest things. As if it were a straight road mapped out on the ground ... These things cannot be explained in detail. From one thing, know ten thousand things. When you attain the Way of strategy there will not be one thing you cannot see. You must study hard."

Ted Williams started the modern theory of bat speed as the most important part of power generation. He talked about reducing his bat weight where previously very heavy bats were believed essential for power. He would bake his bats and keep them in drying containers. He was the first hitter to ever use batting gloves and to use pine tar to improve grip.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Ted was always great. He did not improve on a linear basis because of hard work or knowledge. He was the Michael Jordan of his sport. I know of no one that he was able to translate his skills to. Not even his son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ted was always great. He did not improve on a linear basis because of hard work or knowledge. He was the Michael Jordan of his sport. I know of no one that he was able to translate his skills to. Not even his son.

I am not sure where you get your info about Ted, but everything I have read about him, including his own book and Bradlees exhaustive biography would lead me to say that Ted would certainly disagree with your assessment vehemently, i.e. that he was just natural born as a hitter and didnt work at it. In fact, from a young age and throughout his career, he would hit more balls than anyone ever, he had an encyclopedic knowledge and memory about pitchers and he worked obsessionally at the craft of hitting.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure where you get your info about Ted, but everything I have read about him, including his own book and Bradlees exhaustive biography would lead me to say that Ted would certainly disagree with your assessment vehemently, i.e. that he was just natural born as a hitter and didnt work at it. In fact, from a young age and throughout his career, he would hit more balls than anyone ever, he had an encyclopedic knowledge and memory about pitchers and he worked obsessionally at the craft of hitting.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

He also had 20/10 eyesight and phenomenal reflexes.

Shame he didn't spend more time in the outfield, that is where his game needed the work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is probably that Adam is just not the truly rare and elite talent of a player like say a Hank Aaron who would hit 49 hrs and strike out 31 times or a Pujols who had a strikeout percentage of less than 10 percent while hitting 40-50 hrs compared to say a Chris Davis or Jones and Adam Dunn, Mark Reynolds types who strike out over 30 percent of the time.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is probably that Adam is just not the truly rare and elite talent of a player like say a Hank Aaron who would hit 49 hrs and strike out 31 times or a Pujols who had a strikeout percentage of less than 10 percent while hitting 40-50 hrs compared to say a Chris Davis or Jones and Adam Dunn, Mark Reynolds types who strike out over 30 percent of the time.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

To lump Adam with those other examples is a insult to your intellect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also had 20/10 eyesight and phenomenal reflexes.

Shame he didn't spend more time in the outfield, that is where his game needed the work.

In one game against Milwaukee, the Brewers had the tying run at second base when Donie Bush happened to look out to right field and see Williams swinging his imaginary bat. But this time, his glove wasn?t even on. It was lying on the grass next to him, a useless appendage. Bush stopped the game, sprinted out to Ted, and yelled, ?What?s the idea! This run means the ball game!? Not to worry, the Kid replied. ?That guy never hits to right field" from The Kid, by Ben Bradlee, Jr.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Hindsight. Roy Firestone Plus Member  35.4k Posted September 6, 2023 Gibson is brutal...  
    • Cool that he wanted to come back. Would the O's have paid that much for a long man and would Elias even want a long man?
    • The O’s were never going to trade for a stud like Burnes and resign Gibson.  They went for an upgrade and got one.  
    • I know for a fact he wanted to stay...12-13 million would have been a good 1. year protection plan..He was really respected and loved by his teammates...
    • Handley has been on IL since 6/8/24.  As of this morning, no idea if he will be returning to action after 1 week or if it is going to be time.  Only time will tell...  But the O's decided to give Banuelos a break from the taxi squad yesterday.  Am I reading into something?  Sure, but isn't that what we do here? However...  this week off of Handley vs. Hunt has given my son and I some more time to look at Hunt's 2024 history.  (I still think this is a SSS (small sample size) but since some on this board rejoice over 1 week of good performance  I'm going the other direction... bad performance.) As a precursor, I'm starting to think the O's fans need to brace for "something is better than nothing" when it comes to Hunt.  But what exactly is the "something" as it comes to Hunt for Baumann/Perez trade.  I believe it is also looking that we got "April Fooled" even acknowledging the SSS. Hunt's April stats with Tacoma (SEA): 12 games, 42 PA, 37 AB, 14 H, 2-2B, 1-3B, 2-HR, 2 HBP, 3 BB and only 4 K.   .378/.452/.649 for a 1.101 OPS   These stats would have OH screaming for Hunt over McCann.  This seems to have been the opinion when the trade first happened with Mariner fans as they were wanting hunt moved up to SEA. Since then...  well...  April shower's bring May flowers and maybe we got a carnation. 11 more games with Tacoma before the trade.  38 PA, 33 AB, 7H, 2-2B, 2 HR, 2 HBP, 2 BB, 4K.     .212/.308/.455 for a 0.763 now... the O's would have seen this as well... but the average over his 24 games before coming to the Tide wasn't bad.  .293/.372/.533 with .905 OPS.  This was still attention getting for sure.  But would the O's and OH posters have liked this trade based on just his May numbers? So... let's break down the 24 games with Tacoma vs. 12 games with Norfolk using some of Fangraphs stats/metrics: The 'highlight' and literally this is the ONLY highlight I can find.  (There is a 'candle' light as well) HIGHLIGHT:  In 12 games with Tides, Hunt has 3 HR (1:16 PA).  He only had 4 with Tacoma in 24 games (1:19 PA) CANDLELIGHT:  3 of 15 runners caught (20% for Norfolk) vs. 2 of 18 runners caught (11.1% for Tacoma).  But hey, this is an 80% increase! Here are some of the shadow numbers that 'fans' really don't want to look at because it flies into the face of 'HOPE'  Hunt's AAA wRC+ while with SEA in 2024 was 121.  Hunt's AAAA wRC+ while with BAL is.... 46.    Ooooffff. Hunt's BB & K rate while with SEA were 7.0% and 11.6%.  Hunt's BB/K rate with BAL are 0.0% and 36.7%.  Based on his walk rate... reminds me of a MLB O'S catcher.    Is the IL pitching that much better than the PCL?  Is Hunt trying to hard because of the H vs. H competition?  Hunt's SwStr% has gone from 7.7% to 16.1% between teams. Maybe this is a look into what other GM's saw and why Hunt is on/in his 4th MLB organization and still in MiLB. Last little nugget... like my dog kicking the grass after a piss... Since going to Tacoma from the Trade, Michael Perez has done almost the opposite!  His SwStr% has gone from 11.8% to 6.9%.  wRC+ had gone from 58 to 96.  His walk rate has tripled (5.7 to 17.9). His K rate has nearly halved (31 to 17.9). So... we aren't half way thru the AAA season and there is more time to compare our catchers coming up.  When and how Handley comes back from his IL stint is going to be interesting.
    • If Bradish is out for TJ, then I'd trade anyone for the right SP with 2+ years of control. We're going to need to replace Bradish for the rest of this year and some of next. Chances are pretty high that Burnes hits FA. So, we need 2 TOR SP next year. I think a proven SP helps us more than waiting to see what type of MLBer any of the prospects will be.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...