Jump to content

What do now that Rasmus is off the board?


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Keep telling yourself that. Maybe if you say it enough times you'll actually believe it!

De Aza has a .730 OPS over the last 3 years to Markakis' .738. De Aza steals 20 bases a year while Markakis is a snail on the bases. Even if you don't believe the defensive metrics that say De Aza is a better fielder, there's no way he's an overall significant downgrade from Markakis.

Even if Pearce hits his career average .768 OPS, he'd really only cost us a couple wins from what Cruz did (.859 OPS).

Obviously, losing a couple wins isn't good. It could cost us a spot in the playoffs. But I've heard some posters say losing Cruz and Markakis is going to be what takes this team from 96 wins to .500 at best next year which is silly. They're a strong wild card contender and could pull off the division again if things break right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sucks, plain and simple. We supposedly were willing to give him $7M. He signed for $8M.

It's possible that we could still fill our hole in RF by trading one of our starters, although the Fowler trade takes the most attractive name off the market. Barring that, we are going to wind up having to give David Lough 400 at bats, because we weren't willing to spend $8M instead of $7M on someone who actually has some upside with the bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you saying Syd Thrift did better than Andy in this case?

No, a defensible four year deal that doesn't pan out is ultimately more damaging then an indefensible one year deal in which the player completely bombs.

Thrift's deal should have worked out better but baseball doesn't work that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...