Jump to content

The This Team IS Done, We are Dumb and Nothing can Fix it MEGA THREAD


MagicBird

Recommended Posts

My apologies. I can sometimes type much harsher than I mean for it to "sound". I truly didn't mean to insult you or anyone else.

I think I was referring to Bmorechop actually. I did not know I responded to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think I was referring to Bmorechop actually. I did not know I responded to you.

I just sent you a message apologizing for my accidental snark (didn't mean to insult, but the smiles and chuckles that go along with the comment are obviously not communicated on the board) and to report that an old username of mine resurfaced in that exchange. I haven't used "bmorechop" in years, or at least I don't think I have. I have no idea how it reappeared. Is there such a thing as ghost cookies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just sent you a message apologizing for my accidental snark (didn't mean to insult, but the smiles and chuckles that go along with the comment are obviously not communicated on the board) and to report that an old username of mine resurfaced in that exchange. I haven't used "bmorechop" in years, or at least I don't think I have. I have no idea how it reappeared. Is there such a thing as ghost cookies?

Probably. And it makes sense now that I see it. I will merge it into your current name. Thanks for reaching out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was on record as not wanting to be be burdened with the type of contract that Cruz, a DH, at the level that Seattle signed him. That said, I was very hopeful for this season that we would make that mistake.

Back to baseball...I just don't think Cruz's contract is that much of a risk given the current market. He is likely to outproduce 14 million the first two years of his deal and may significantly outproduce 14 million this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to baseball...I just don't think Cruz's contract is that much of a risk given the current market. He is likely to outproduce 14 million the first two years of his deal and may significantly outproduce 14 million this year.

It's possible that you are right. I believed last May that Nelson would continue at the pace he was at. I thought that he may have used some enhancement when he was with us and that he was careful. I believed that he was playing for the contract that he felt cheated out of. Then he underperformed Chris Davis for three months.

Then he was real good again. When Luke Scott was hot, I never saw a hotter hitter. THen he would go for a month without a hit. I have no idea why any of this happens but as a convicted PED user, I find his history a bit odd. I would not be surprised if he has an extended cold streak this season. Or in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all a matter of what risk the organization is willing to take. They are paying De Aza, Matusz, and Cabrera ten million this year. I would much rather have invested that money into Cruz and taken the risk of Cruz underperforming the backend of the contract. I think investing ten million into those three guys was a worst investment for a supposedly poor team.

The bolded part of your statement is meaningless. I sure hope the O's organization is not making decisions based on how the OH will react.

I don't believe the team gives two spits about what the oh thinks about any given move. My point was more around the kvetching amongst a certain group about the non-move. I doubt they would

Be happy with the alternative.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we're not supposed to sign any free agent hitters who aren't at the level of Miguel Cabrera or Mike Trout?

I think his opinion is that relievers and DHs are not entitled to four year contracts at the top end of what their possible value could be.

I also do not think that he advocates for contract length or AAV of Stanton, Fielder, Hamilton, Braun types of deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all a matter of what risk the organization is willing to take. They are paying De Aza, Matusz, and Cabrera ten million this year. I would much rather have invested that money into Cruz and taken the risk of Cruz underperforming the backend of the contract. I think investing ten million into those three guys was a worst investment for a supposedly poor team.

The bolded part of your statement is meaningless. I sure hope the O's organization is not making decisions based on how the OH will react.

I'd rather spend the 10 on THREE players than 12 on ONE iffy 33 year old coming off a career year.

That's just stupid business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As usual you have made a lot of great points in this thread, but your quote is a stretch. Yeah, it is pretty much guaranteed that Cruz will be a producer for the first two years of that contract. He may not be Babe Ruth, but there's a high probability that Cruz will be a MLB leader in OPS+ the first two years of that contract.

I don't know how you can possibly say that. Last year he was 15th in the majors in OPS. And from June-August he had a .214/.283/.398 line. In 2013 he was 39th in OPS, if you lower the qualifying threshold since he didn't have enough PAs. In 2012 he was 71st of 143 qualifiers. In 2011 he was 45th of 145. The idea that he's a guaranteed top player for the next two years is ludicrous - in three of the last four years, in his early 30s, he wasn't in the top 30 players in the league. And that's just on offense! Once you figure in his negative value from defense and baserunning he drops even further in value. It's pure mid-May-20/20-hindsight to say Nelson Cruz was a lock to produce at a league-leading level in 2015-16.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to baseball...I just don't think Cruz's contract is that much of a risk given the current market. He is likely to outproduce 14 million the first two years of his deal and may significantly outproduce 14 million this year.

His peak value (peak!) using fWAR from 2011-13 was $9.8M. He wasn't worth $30M over that three-year timeframe. The number of players who're significantly more valuable from 34-36 than from 30-33 are vanishingly small. That goes double if you exclude the 1995-2010ish era, where some players may have had some amount of late-career help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...