Jump to content

Janish and Clevenger belong on this team in 2016


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I didn't start the thread for them to be everyday players. I'd like to have Janisn on the bench. I'd like flahery to catch 50 games and get DH at bats vs rhp. Janisn might have a bad career ops but at least he takes pitches. We just need more guys that work the count on our team. Since our stars Macahdo, Jones and Schoop aren't very patient then we need to have patient hitters as our role players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think posters that are looking at Janish offense are missing the point.

The O's need a UIF. In 2016 the UIF will probably get most of his playing time backing up Hardy at SS. Janish is much better at that than Flaherty. There may be a few at bats at 2B and 3B. Janish can fill that role. But defense at SS is by far the way I think Buck will judge who the UIF should be. That is Janish.

As far as offense goes, neither Flaherty nor Janish are likely to put a 700 OPS. That means what we have here is a good field/no hit UIF when picking between the two.

As far as both of them making the team. Why would the O's do that? Flaherty has options. They can send him down or trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as both of them making the team. Why would the O's do that? Flaherty has options. They can send him down or trade him.

I think that we would reasonably look at both of them on the 40 man roster until Hardy's health is evident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the advantage to that? Seriously, I'd like to know.

During the previous offensive boom it was hammered into fans, mostly because of the way the Red Sox and Yankees were constructed, that patience is a virtue.

I think it has to do with how many more commercials you can air when the 5-3 games goes 3:45.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think posters that are looking at Janish offense are missing the point.

The O's need a UIF. In 2016 the UIF will probably get most of his playing time backing up Hardy at SS. Janish is much better at that than Flaherty. There may be a few at bats at 2B and 3B. Janish can fill that role. But defense at SS is by far the way I think Buck will judge who the UIF should be. That is Janish.

I couldn't agree more. Good analysis.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the previous offensive boom it was hammered into fans, mostly because of the way the Red Sox and Yankees were constructed, that patience is a virtue.

I think it has to do with how many more commercials you can air when the 5-3 games goes 3:45.

You and I know that. It means nothing in the greater scope of things. I wish someone other than us would acknowledge that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You and I know that. It means nothing in the greater scope of things. I wish someone other than us would acknowledge that though.

It took me a couple years to come up with the idea on my own.*

Can't expect other folks to listen to a couple guys on a message board when everyone on TV is telling them the opposite.

*Yes I know that there is very good work being done by others concerning TTTOP and Bullpens. I had come to my conclusions before seeing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...