Jump to content

Offseason Rumors and Deals Around MLB


neveradoubt

Recommended Posts

This is gonna be the offseason that a lot of people look back on as a point in time where salaries just got completely out of hand. A completely average player is now worth $10M a year? Cespedes will make 50x what a rookie makes now.

The price of baseball is going up by a whole lot over the next 5 years, which means a lot more risk in contracts. I wonder how Pete is going to react to having this much volatility tied up in big contracts at many positions on his team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Terrible deal by mets but also amazing that he shot down nats offer. They can't get anyone to take their money except Murphy who was probably not getting anything close from any other team.
Keep in mind the Nats offer was $10M more than ours, which wasn't pulled until Davis signed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is at least a decent possibility Cespedes will end up leaving money on the table long term as I expect him not to be able to opt out and do better next offseason which will leave him in a 3 year/$75M contract and very little contract to follow. He will need to get better than 2/$25 on his next deal if he doesn't opt out in order to come out ahead. Maybe he will age a lot better than I expect him to.

Interesting deal to say the least.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Plan A is to have a good year and take the opt out. The market for bats is pretty thin next year, and teams such as the Yankees that aren't players now could be by then. If he puts up a decent year, he should be about to get something like 4/$90 or 5/$100. I think the odds are >50% he will have a pretty good year at Age 30 and be in roughly the same position next year for an Alex Gordon type of deal.

If he has an off year next year, Plan B is to bounce back in years 2 and 3, get a QO which will be about $20M at that point, or another 2-3 year deal.

He would have to be bad for three years in a row to get completely shut out after year 3. Seems like a good gamble to take, and lately the market seems to be rewarding greed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plan A is to have a good year and take the opt out. The market for bats is pretty thin next year, and teams such as the Yankees that aren't players now could be by then. If he puts up a decent year, he should be about to get something like 4/$90 or 5/$100. I think the odds are >50% he will have a pretty good year at Age 30 and be in roughly the same position next year for an Alex Gordon type of deal.

If he has an off year next year, Plan B is to bounce back in years 2 and 3, get a QO which will be about $20M at that point, or another 2-3 year deal.

He would have to be bad for three years in a row to get completely shut out after year 3. Seems like a good gamble to take, and lately the market seems to be rewarding greed.

Good take. It's a no lose for both parties. They can both win and the Mets can get a comp pick out of this next offseason. Spend the money while they can before they have to lock up their SP's. Good news for O's fans is that this makes the Mets even bigger favorites to win the NL East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is gonna be the offseason that a lot of people look back on as a point in time where salaries just got completely out of hand. A completely average player is now worth $10M a year? Cespedes will make 50x what a rookie makes now.

The price of baseball is going up by a whole lot over the next 5 years, which means a lot more risk in contracts. I wonder how Pete is going to react to having this much volatility tied up in big contracts at many positions on his team?

Why would the price of baseball be going up over the next five years? The only reason that would be true would be if many more people were interested in baseball and willing to spend money on it. It certainly wouldn't be going up just because owners decided to spend more on payroll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is at least a decent possibility Cespedes will end up leaving money on the table long term as I expect him not to be able to opt out and do better next offseason which will leave him in a 3 year/$75M contract and very little contract to follow. He will need to get better than 2/$25 on his next deal if he doesn't opt out in order to come out ahead. Maybe he will age a lot better than I expect him to.

Interesting deal to say the least.

I remember back when the Rangers signed a young Alex Rodriguez for 10/250. It was considered an insane contract by everyone. Now, it looks thrifty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is gonna be the offseason that a lot of people look back on as a point in time where salaries just got completely out of hand. A completely average player is now worth $10M a year? Cespedes will make 50x what a rookie makes now.

The price of baseball is going up by a whole lot over the next 5 years, which means a lot more risk in contracts. I wonder how Pete is going to react to having this much volatility tied up in big contracts at many positions on his team?

Oops. Wrong post replied to.

I remember back when the Rangers signed a young Alex Rodriguez for 10/250. It was considered an insane contract by everyone. Now, it looks thrifty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is almost a no lose for the Mets, but saying there is no possible lose for Cespedes is incorrect. He could certainly lose 25M dollars from what was available. It isn't even difficult to imagine. Bat slows a bit, major injury, significantly loss of defensive value due to age. Who knows where he could be in 3 years. Now, the consolation prize is that he is guaranteed at least 75M so nobody is crying for him, but he could certainly end up leaving significant money on the table.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

If he has even a solid year I would be shocked if he doesn't opt out. So long as he doesn't get injured/fall off a cliff in 2016 I think he likely makes out just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops. Wrong post replied to.

I remember back when the Rangers signed a young Alex Rodriguez for 10/250. It was considered an insane contract by everyone. Now, it looks thrifty.

What was the free agent value of a win from 2001-2010? I'd guess it started out around $3M and ended up at maybe $5 or $6M. If the average was $4M they were paying for 62 wins and he gave the Rangers and Yanks 71. It was a fair deal with some excess value. Today at $7M or so a win it would be better, but a 25-year-old ARod (or Harper or Machado or Trout) would cost more in 2016 dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was the free agent value of a win from 2001-2010? I'd guess it started out around $3M and ended up at maybe $5 or $6M. If the average was $4M they were paying for 62 wins and he gave the Rangers and Yanks 71. It was a fair deal with some excess value. Today at $7M or so a win it would be better, but a 25-year-old ARod (or Harper or Machado or Trout) would cost more in 2016 dollars.

I hear you, but your argument is a bit circular like all cost per wins arguments like this. Arod's contract contributed to the increase in the cost per wins on the free agent market, so they are not completely independent. It's like averaging the cost of driving a mile across different car models to justify the expense of buying a Mercedes versus a Toyota.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would the price of baseball be going up over the next five years? The only reason that would be true would be if many more people were interested in baseball and willing to spend money on it. It certainly wouldn't be going up just because owners decided to spend more on payroll.

I wonder if there are owners who simply won't want to or be able to spend a much larger that current percentage on just one player? If so, I would imagine the larger markets would see an greater increase in those types of players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I think at $5 million he's an insurance policy that can go to the pen if need be. I'd rather not go into spring training with him penciled into the rotation. But I also don't want Trevor Rogers penciled in either.  He also could be a bridge until Bradish is ready.
    • So to all of you saying you would bring him back…. GRod, Eflin, Kremer, Felix, DC, Webb, Soto, Dominguez, Akin and Cano That leaves room for 3 more pitchers and this doesn’t include McDermott, Rogers or Povich. 3 spots left, 1 high end reliever and 2 starters. Which of those 3 spots do you want him at or, who do you take off the above list and keep Suarez over?
    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...