Jump to content

Os Sign O'Day for 4 Years - It's official


Nevermore

Recommended Posts

Hardy is completely done as an significant offensive contributor. If the last two seasons haven't proven that, I don't know what will. He's not getting any younger and his back and shoulder aren't magically going to heal themselves.

I honestly don't necessarily disagree with this. But, I believe if he continues to hit the same way next year that Buck won't stay with him all year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Well, if the O's are going to match their longest pitcher contract offer ever, they may as well do it with a 33 year old reliever. There probably isn't a safer bet in free agency. Right?

2014 offseason: We don't commit that much money to non-closing relief pitchers...

2015 offseason: ...unless they're old.

Committing this kind of money without having a serious shift in payroll is silly to me with so many other issues to address and money drying up quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles have a lot of power already, but they need consistent players, not guys who's hit .150 and strike out every other PA for long stretches. I'd like to see them in on Zobrist or Gordon rather than Davis honestly.
We'll have to agree to disagree. Zobrist is almost 5 years older. In 2015, Davis' worst month was a .765 OPS in May, but that was better than 4 months that Zobrist posted. The last two months of the year, over 60 games, Davis' line was .288/ .415/ .665/ 1.080 OPS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Darren O'Day had the 6th lowest average exit velocity against in MLB at 84.88 MPH last year. (Min 1000 pitches) <a href="https://t.co/63vTrHrT4z">https://t.co/63vTrHrT4z</a></p>— Daren Willman (@darenw) <a href="

">December 6, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if the O's are going to match their longest pitcher contract offer ever, they may as well do it with a 33 year old reliever. There probably isn't a safer bet in free agency. Right?

2014 offseason: We don't commit that much money to non-closing relief pitchers...

2015 offseason: ...unless they're old.

Committing this kind of money without having a serious shift in payroll is silly to me with so many other issues to address and money drying up quick.

I thought about this, too. What did The Yanks pay Miller? 3/27? I think the O'Day signing is a clear admission that letting Miller go was a mistake... Happy to have O'Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought about this, too. What did The Yanks pay Miller? 3/27? I think the O'Day signing is a clear admission that letting Miller go was a mistake... Happy to have O'Day.

I think Miller was as devastating a reliever when we had him as I have ever seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought about this, too. What did The Yanks pay Miller? 3/27? I think the O'Day signing is a clear admission that letting Miller go was a mistake... Happy to have O'Day.

Miller got 4/36. I'm not advocating that either as I woudn't have liked the Miller deal and definitely don't like the O'Day deal. I just found the contrast funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'm just not going to get all up and arms on December 6th of the offseason. So far the only thing this offseason I've not been for is offering Wieters a QO. I don't think Davis is worth the money he's going to get from someone and I don't see the Orioles paying that for one guy who's name isn't Machado. The Orioles have a lot of power already, but they need consistent players, not guys who's hit .150 and strike out every other PA for long stretches. I'd like to see them in on Zobrist or Gordon rather than Davis honestly.

Davis is not who Orioles need. They need players who put the ball in play more.

Gordon would be perfect for big LF at Camden Yards and would fit nicely in front of Machado in the 2 hole of the lineup. Get him and speedy RF to lead off on the

relative cheap and the lineup is set. Rotation is a whole different matter entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miller got 4/36. I'm not advocating that either as I woudn't have liked the Miller deal and definitely don't like the O'Day deal. I just found the contrast funny.

I think the Yankees got him for 36 million because...Yankees. I think the Astros 40 million was what everyone not Yankees was bidding against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought about this, too. What did The Yanks pay Miller? 3/27? I think the O'Day signing is a clear admission that letting Miller go was a mistake... Happy to have O'Day.

4/36. The only major difference in risk with Miller was his spottier health/durability track record. I really like O'Day, but am still very wary of that kind of commitment to a reliever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don't think it's anything close to 90%.  As of June the brand recognition of the cereal was under 90%. If you have two pretty similar nicknames isn't it just common sense to go with the one that isn't the street name of a drug? And for the record all I was doing was giving a personal preference.  I never said anyone couldn't do whatever the heck they wanted.
    • This is the story, or part of the story, of the last two Orioles' seasons: trying to balance winning games and reaching the postseason (and, last year and and for a long time this year, a division title) with building for the future. However you balance those two, there is a risk of harming the team. The way the Orioles have been and are being built, relying on a bunch of young position players to blossom at around the same time, enhanced that risk. Sometimes these two objectives line up pretty well, after weakening the team for a short time, as they did with Westburg, Henderson and Rutschman, and to a lesser degree Cowser. Sometimes the objectives don't fit together very well, as has been the case with Holliday and Mayo. The possibility of that misfit was, and is, inherent in the way this team was built. Maybe the harm to the team's overall performance from playing the young guys could have been reduced by better coaching or more effective communication with the coaches, but there was really no way for this team to avoid the problem.
    • He's always looked calm and capable in his mlb at-bats. Let's the ball come to him, as they say. Am optimistic.
    • Position Players: 2023: 105 wRC+, 16.0 BsR, 54.9 Off, -26.3 Def, 23.8 WAR   2024: 113 wRC+, 1.2 BsR, 90.8 Off, -26.1 Def, 27.0 WAR   The 2023 batters had a clutch score of 8.39. That number is -1.35 this season. The 2023 batters had an xwOBA of .319 (15th). That number is .328 this season (6th). The RISP was also much better last year (as we all know). Not only did they hit for a much higher average (.287 versus .246 this year), but their ISO with RISP jumped up to .195 (it was .166 in all situations).    The defense is about as valuable as last year even though they seem much less reliable. Gunnar has been more valuable defensively according to Fangraphs, the catchers have been worse, Westburg and Mullins have been slightly worse, but Frazier was awful last year at 2B (as was Hicks in the OF) and removing him while adding an elite defender in Cowser puts them about even to last year. The base running is nowhere near as good.   The pitching is slightly worse than last year (18.3 WAR and 3.91 ERA last year, 16.5 WAR and 3.93 ERA this year) but they’ve also had a ton of innings soaked up (mostly due to injuries) by guys that aren’t going to pitch for them in the playoffs. Last year, the below group threw 259 innings and gave up 159 ER’s (5.53 ERA):   Vespi, Irvin, Zimmerman, Fuji, Voth, Lopez, Gillaspie, Flaherty, Akin, Garrett, Givens, Bazardo, McKenna   This year, from they have gotten 366.1 IP from the below group, while giving up 229 ER’s (5.63 ERA):   Vieira, McCann, Krook, Heasley, Rogers, McDermott, Ramirez. Wells, Smith, Povich, Kimbrel, Irvin, Tate, Baker    That means that the rest of the pitching staff in 2023 (besides the above group) threw 1194.2 IP, giving up 472 ER for a 3.55 ERA. In 2024 besides the above group, the rest of the staff has combined for 1022.2 IP, giving up 378 ER for a 3.33 ERA. The 2023 pitching staff had a 6.03 clutch score and a 73.5 LOB%. In 2024, those numbers are -0.93 and 71.4 %. The 2023 pitchers had an xwOBA of .317 (15th). That number is .310 this season (T-9th).    In the offseason, a lot of people were saying this team might be better than last year but finish with a worse record. As frustrating as the last 3 months have been, you could easily make that case. The offense has been better overall, but much worse with RISP and less clutch. The core pitching group has arguably been as good as last year’s, they just had a lot more injuries and innings thrown by fringe guys that won’t be pitching in the playoffs. FWIW, Texas was one of the least clutch teams in the regular season last year and then were unsurprisingly the most clutch team in the playoffs. The Orioles followed up their extremely clutch regular season by being the 2nd least clutch pitching team (only PHI was worse and they played an extra 2 series) and 3rd least clutch batting team (only PHI and MIN were worse - MIN played an extra series as well).    So TLDR. They have arguably been a better team than last year that has dealt with many more injuries, had a lot more PA’s and IP’s from worse players due to those injuries, and have been extremely unclutch. Some of that might be luck, some of it might be skill, but it could change at any time. 
    • And sorta boring, like this thread.
    • Even if they make the playoffs, Bautista isn't going to make it back in time. I do think the O's can't go into next season assuming Bautista is going to be healthy or effective. They really need to acquire a couple bullpen arms and not keep getting folks off the scrap heap. And they can't rely on Soto or even Seranthony to have a key part of the pen. I think Elias has tremendously struck out with anything and everything Phillies bullpen pieces (Kimbrel, Soto, Seranthony). Seranthony has a 0.3 WAR in 22 games, Soto -0.2 in nearly all low leverage situations, and Kimbrel with a -1.1. And the O's are out double digit millions, Seth Johnson, Moises Chace, Austin Hays for what amounts to negative value across the 3 of them. That's...not great.  Could things change in 2025 w/ Seranthony and Soto? Sure! I mean, Seranthony looks decent, but Soto is a situational arm who can be downright dominant or otherworldly incompetent. But Elias can not go into 2025 without picking up 2 reliable bullpen arms. 
    • This post would have been worthy of its own thread.  If I can just augment this, last year’s team was 0.36 runs/game better than average on offense, and 0.43 better than average on run prevention.   This year’s team is 0.40 better than average  on offense, but only 0.21 better on run prevention.  So, the offense actually has been a little better than last year’s relative to the league, while run prevention has been worse.   However, the offense has been very problematic the last 5 weeks or so.    As to bullpen regression, Bautista (10 ER in 61.0 IP) vs. Kimbrel (31 ER in 52.1 IP) explains about 2/3 of the regression all by itself.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...