Jump to content

Fangraphs: Noting Kevin Gausman (Extend Gausman now!)


Spy Fox

Recommended Posts

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/noticing-kevin-gausman/

An encouraging take on our favorite recently de-spectacled pitcher.

"And there are some reasons to think there?s a good deal of upside left in Gausman. He?s thrown the ball like a three-win pitcher over the course of his career but it wouldn't be shocking to see a 4-5 WAR season in the near future. For one, his strikeout rate was up and his walk rate was down in 2015 compared to 2014. The only thing that bit him was a increase home run rate, and while that?s a concern, when you pair it with a solid increase in Soft% allowed and a 3.4-point drop in Contact%, you?ve got yourself a nice little trend overall."

"If he can develop his other offerings even a little more as he ages, he could be extremely dangerous. There's definitely potential for at least one of his slider or splitter to become consistently above average."

"It's a strange situation overall in that the Orioles haven't attempted to push Gausman terribly hard over the first couple of years of his career...That arrangement has kept him out of the headlines, but it might also give the Orioles a shot to lock up a potentially great pitcher for pennies on the dollar."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This line of thinking is probably lost on some here, but as a small to mid market team the Orioles have to be creative when it comes to locking up their homegrown players. And yes, there's little risk involved when you do it before not after a breakout season.

A low innings number isn?t an argument in favor of Gausman as a good pitcher, but it is a small reason why we?re less likely to notice him and realize he?s still on a track for a really nice career.

Consider, instead, his 2014 and 2015 seasons as one unit. It?s 225.2 innings of work over 37 starts and eight relief outings. That?s a bit more than a full season, but it?s in the neighborhood of a full season. Over those two years he?s produced a 3.6 WAR and 3.3 RA9-WAR, which would be very good marks for a pitcher in his first or second full season.

....It?s a strange situation overall in that the Orioles haven?t attempted to push Gausman terribly hard over the first couple of years of his career. Perhaps it cost them in 2014, but given that they made the ALCS, it?s hard to make that case. As a result, Gausman has only burned through one year of service time and hasn?t logged a ton of mileage on his arm. That arrangement has kept him out of the headlines, but it might also give the Orioles a shot to lock up a potentially great pitcher for pennies on the dollar. If he already had two years of service and a pair of 170-plus inning seasons under his belt, the cost of an extension would be much higher.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/noticing-kevin-gausman/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a refresher, $30 million over five years with a couple of $12-14mil options. That's a lot less downside risk with about $6 million AAV even if he only turns into a closer. Heck, at current rates Britton will sail past that in arbitration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a refresher, $30 million over five years with a couple of $12-14mil options. That's a lot less downside risk with about $6 million AAV even if he only turns into a closer. Heck, at current rates Britton will sail past that in arbitration.

Let's assume, for sake of argument, that Gausman reaches the level Tillman was at in 2012-14 for the next few years. I'm guessing his comp on a year-to-year basis would look something like:

$500k

$3.5 mm (Tillman got $4.3 mm but he had more service time and had two 200-inning seasons under his belt)

$6.0 mm

$9.0 mm

$12.0 mm

Total: $31 mm

Considering injury and performance risks, I think 5/$30 mm is pretty risky, even though Gausman could turn out to be better than the 2012-14 Tillman over the next few years and the options may come in handy. So, I'd say that's a borderline call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
    • Bingo....I have said this before also. Wives of players are not clamoring to come near B-More. Factor in taxes and its a hard sell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...