Jump to content

Buck's decision to pull McFarland with 2 outs in the 9th last night


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The problem is that it is only a 4-run game, so it could become a save situation very quickly. So you may have to warm up O'Day in order to protect Britton, and if O'Day is warmed up you might as well use him?

This presupposes that he absolutely wasn't going to use Britton. And yet Britton was warming up. It was a mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not certain if this applies to Britton, but many sinkerballers perform better when their arms are a little "tired". He may prefer to warm up some nights even if it's highly unlikely he'd pitch. No idea if this was the case last night (or ever), but getting him up "unnecessarily" might be free of downside or even of some benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what did Buck say when the media asked him about it?

Great question. I didn't watch the post-game press conference, but I would be interested to know the answer.

I like Buck a lot but for him to pretend that he is not beholden to the save rule is one thing that bothers me about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great question. I didn't watch the post-game press conference, but I would be interested to know the answer.

I like Buck a lot but for him to pretend that he is not beholden to the save rule is one thing that bothers me about him.

I would be surprised if any of the media questioned Buck about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Britton really "warmed up"? Sometimes they just stand there ready to get loose if necessary. If he was fully warmed up, I agree, that would be the most bizarre aspect of this.

He was warming up. You don't throw having pitched the last two games if you don't think there is a chance you are going in. It isn't like he just happened to be out there stretching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely hated the move, but Buck's gonna do Buck things. I'll gladly take this as the bad with all the good he brings. This is really my only quibble with his bullpen management. He never wants to see a win slip away in the 9th inning, so he always uses relievers far better than what is required for the leverage of the last inning. The long reliever is almost never allowed to finish off games for a W no matter how big the lead is. Stuff like O'Day pitching with a 4 run lead, or Brach with a 5 run lead, along those lines.

Managing a group of humans, I see where he's coming from. You do not want to lose those games with less than your best on the mound. That's a blow to team morale the same way it is to fans. It's one of those places where numbers don't line up with what may actually be the best practice. But Buck certainly never takes any chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely hated the move, but Buck's gonna do Buck things. I'll gladly take this as the bad with all the good he brings. This is really my only quibble with his bullpen management. He never wants to see a win slip away in the 9th inning, so he always uses relievers far better than what is required for the leverage of the last inning. The long reliever is almost never allowed to finish off games for a W no matter how big the lead is. Stuff like O'Day pitching with a 4 run lead, or Brach with a 5 run lead, along those lines.

Managing a group of humans, I see where he's coming from. You do not want to lose those games with less than your best on the mound. That's a blow to team morale the same way it is to fans. It's one of those places where numbers don't line up with what may actually be the best practice. But Buck certainly never takes any chances.

Yeah. I long time ago stopped trying to guess what Billy Martin taught to Buck Showalter to pull out at the 11th hour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I think at $5 million he's an insurance policy that can go to the pen if need be. I'd rather not go into spring training with him penciled into the rotation. But I also don't want Trevor Rogers penciled in either.  He also could be a bridge until Bradish is ready.
    • So to all of you saying you would bring him back…. GRod, Eflin, Kremer, Felix, DC, Webb, Soto, Dominguez, Akin and Cano That leaves room for 3 more pitchers and this doesn’t include McDermott, Rogers or Povich. 3 spots left, 1 high end reliever and 2 starters. Which of those 3 spots do you want him at or, who do you take off the above list and keep Suarez over?
    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...