Jump to content

PED Suspensions Coming


Sessh

Recommended Posts

It's fair to wonder as long as the wondering is even handed. School and Machado have seen their power increase too. How many Oriole fans were questioning Nelson Cruz two years ago. I find the OP silly because it doesn't open the same possibilities on the O's. Ortiz is certainly a suspicious case.

I don't think Schoop is an more likely than Manny. Cruz for certain. In fact, he even had the training on the troches and gummies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Mookie Betts were an Oriole and hit 5 HR's in 2 days, not a single person on this board would suggest he was on steroids. Not one. He's an incredible talent. Period.

He is a great talent but when all the scouting reports say the sam thing that he will be a very good player with the speed athlete he is and his contact and walking but he will not hit for power and then he goes crazy and is on pace for 40 some homers you have to wonder. The fact he hit 5 homers in a series isn't why i am wondering but I will keep my eye on it and see how many homers he finishes with. If he is in the 20-25 range or the 40 range will determine same thing with Altuve and Story both had a crazy start but have came back to earth but I was watching both of them as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is a great talent but when all the scouting reports say the sam thing that he will be a very good player with the speed athlete he is and his contact and walking but he will not hit for power and then he goes crazy and is on pace for 40 some homers you have to wonder. The fact he hit 5 homers in a series isn't why i am wondering but I will keep my eye on it and see how many homers he finishes with. If he is in the 20-25 range or the 40 range will determine same thing with Altuve and Story both had a crazy start but have came back to earth but I was watching both of them as well.

You do realize that "on pace for" means virutally nothing right? If he ends up with 25 HR's, which is completely possible will you still call him a steroid user with no facts? Nelson Cruz was on pace for like 94 HR's when he was an Oriole. How did that work out for him? On pace for is meaningless. The Orioles were on pace for 102 wins just a couple of weeks ago. Its the most useless saying in baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is a great talent but when all the scouting reports say the sam thing that he will be a very good player with the speed athlete he is and his contact and walking but he will not hit for power and then he goes crazy and is on pace for 40 some homers you have to wonder. The fact he hit 5 homers in a series isn't why i am wondering but I will keep my eye on it and see how many homers he finishes with. If he is in the 20-25 range or the 40 range will determine same thing with Altuve and Story both had a crazy start but have came back to earth but I was watching both of them as well.
No different than Manny jumping from 14 HR in 710 PA in 2013, to 35 HR in 713 PA in 2015.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Mookie Betts were an Oriole and hit 5 HR's in 2 days, not a single person on this board would suggest he was on steroids. Not one. He's an incredible talent. Period.

Agree 100%. IMO, Betts is simply a stud who is just getting better. A la Manny last year. I certainly don't look forward to facing him the next 10-12 years (or Bogaerts or Bradley for that matter).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Mookie Betts were an Oriole and hit 5 HR's in 2 days, not a single person on this board would suggest he was on steroids. Not one. He's an incredible talent. Period.

I think that some would. I know some would. I hear about Manny all the time and he has a 35 HR track record and never his five in two days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Translation into English, please?

Biogenesis had the fast acting Lozenge and gummy bear testosterone program Roy is referring to. Cruz was Biogenesis. I don't believe that Shoop's power came out of nowhere. Or that he is any more likely than Manny to be a PED user. And it was English, I just simplified it.

Edited by weams
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Big Papi is having a "Ruthian" season in his 40's. It's kind of being shoved in our face at the moment.

I just don't like to accuse folks until there is proof. I thought Papi had been tested

and passed. All this could have come out at the beginning of the season. That's

why I asked why now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't like to accuse folks until there is proof. I thought Papi had been tested

and passed. All this could have come out at the beginning of the season. That's

why I asked why now?

They all pass with that program, no one has been caught other than paper trail with the new technique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

A) Mookie Betts became the first player ever in MLB history to hit home runs in both the 1st and 2nd innings of a game for 2 consecutive games (vs. the Orioles, 5/31 and 6/01.)

B) Mookie Betts became the first player ever in MLB history to hit 5 home runs in 2 games from the lead-off position in the batting order (vs. the Orioles, 5/31 and 6/01.)

However ...... the Red Sox only went 1-1 in those 2 games against the Orioles. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is the problem with any type of drug monitoring. If your system is not close to foolproof, then, really, what is the point? Too bad that it is not a better system. And, in the interim, any player who performs beyond expectations beyond a certain age or with increased power is going to be suspect by fans of other teams. And the roots of it all come back to the obscene amounts of money, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think this is totally accurate.  Means was looked at as a guy who no one could count on for this year, I don’t think anyone expected him to be able to finish the season.  Sort of the same scenario with Bradish, I think everyone thought this outcome was inevitable. They tried the treatment and that delayed it but no one should be surprised about this.  Wells is Mr. Glass. The fact that they all went down in the first half of the season is inconvenient but shouldn’t be totally surprising.  All of these guys had issues headed into the season.  
    • We have been several times. We need to be at least 1 game better in the lose column if we're 3 games down. The percentages say we're going to lose one of those 3 games. There's 83 games left to play. We just need to win as many as we can.
    • Yes, they're asking pitchers to throw at 110% all the time, just like everyone else in the world from 11U on up.
    • OP is asking about next year as well as this one. I think the point is we can get a guy who will help us now and next year. We did expect to lose Bradish but not him and Means and Wells all at the same time. Right now we would be going into next year with Grayson as our only dependable guy. Won't be much margin for error without another Burnes type. 
    • Something to keep in mind in the offseason is that the starting pitcher FA market doesn’t look that great in terms of pitchers we would sign or even want to sign. On top of that, you have several guys who only become FA if they opt out and if they opt out, it’s likely because they didn’t have a great season. Combine that with the idea that our only 2 internal rotation candidates are Povich and McDermott, both of whom have exhibited a lot of issues with command and control and it certainly is a shaky long term outlook for the rotation. Position player wise, we will (in theory) lose Santander and McCann. Hays and Mullins are likely gone. Not going to have both Mateo and Urias but certainly could bring back one. As of now, OHearn definitely has his option picked up. If it were up to me, Mounty would be traded. 2 years left of control, likely to be coming off a very solid season and we have players behind him. He could help fetch us some pitching. My expectation is at least 2 of Mounty, OHearn and Santander will be back. How so many of these guys and our prospects end the year will determine how we attack the offseason. But for the deadline, I think obtaining a starter that can be here long term is something the team should look at.     You have several options in Miami and potentially a guy like Detmers.    A Detmers/Estevez package is something I would be looking into.  Same thing with Nardi and one of the Marlins starters, like a Braxton Garrett for example. For me, the key here is that you need to upgrade the pen. I think if you make the pen really good and you have Burnes and GRod, that may be enough.  I’m not trading our top 3 prospects. I think all play big roles in 2025, although Basallo may not play a role until the season is well underway, But I would trade Kjerstad and anyone else while hoping to keep certain guys although they wouldn’t be deal breakers.  
    • And Fangraphs has the Yankees 68% to 31% to win the division.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...