Jump to content

Washington Post article on Kim


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

Remember how they said Kim couldn't handle ML velocity?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Hyun-soo Kim is batting .438 (42 for 96) vs fastballs this year... Wow.<a href="https://t.co/Hn8RzZj02C">https://t.co/Hn8RzZj02C</a></p>— Daren Willman (@darenw) <a href="

">July 29, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Maybe Lost in Translation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Kim's contract is finished, does he go to arbitration or is he a free agent? I'm glad he's doing well for the O's. He seems to always hustle and has good baseball instincts unlike for example, Rickard.

My understanding was that he will be a FA after the '17 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I got that for the article. Buck stopped playing Kim this spring, pure and simple. He didn't want him on the roster to start the year. He rarely played him in April even after he got a few hits. The fact that Kim said, "There's really a lot of things I could say, but I'll stop there," kinda speaks volumes if you ask me.

Now I don't pretend to know what Buck was exactly thinking this spring, but when his first comments about Kim were about his weight you can read between the lines that he wasn't happy with the way he showed up to camp. After the slow start, I think Buck just buried him a bit. The one thing we know about Buck is if you are "one of his guys" you have a good chance of sticking around and if your not, you will be out the door pretty quick if they can do it contractually.

As much as love Buck and think he's a great manager, probably the 2nd best Orioles manager behind Earl Weaver, he does have tendency to make up his mind about a young (In Kim's case new to MLB) player real quickly. Now I'm not syaing Buck doesn't have a pretty good track record of making the correct call, but in Kim's case, I real something rubbed him the wrong way about him early on and it ended up with Buck hoping he would go back to Korea or take a minor league assignment.

One could argue Buck pushed all the right motivational buttons. Whatever ailed Kim in ST, he has overcome it.

Was it Buck's approach? Who knows. But here we are.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One could argue Buck pushed all the right motivational buttons. Whatever ailed Kim in ST, he has overcome it.

Was it Buck's approach? Who knows. But here we are.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

One could also argue that, by virtue of talent and determination, Kim embarrassed Buck to the degree he richly deserved, but no more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...