Jump to content

Why do people swing against Zach Britton?


Orioles4Life21

Recommended Posts

My strategy against Zach Britton would be to not swing under any circumstances until 2 strikes. He gets so many swings and misses down out of the zone it's insane. With a weaker hitter I might even expand that strategy to do not swing at all. More chance of you reaching base on a walk than getting a hit. The most I've seen him struggle is when guys are patient and make him throw more pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Here is Zach's swing and miss pitch chart from this season. Got it from a Daren Willman tweet. 86cb464b335744d0774346f0d1678bf3.jpg

It's obvious, just let him walk you. Unless of course you are trying to win the game. Cause he won't walk four or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's obvious, just let him walk you. Unless of course you are trying to win the game. Cause he won't walk four or more.

Eventually, he'll try to get ahead in the count with a ball more up in the zone. That's your chance to strike. Obviously easier said than done, but I think at least the first couple batters of the inning need to let the bat sit on their shoulder until two strikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I see replays, britton's ball looks like a strike for a long time and then has insane movement at the end.

When that's coming at 96-98 mph and you don't have much time to react it's easier said than done like frobby said.

This is not junk coming it at 88-90. This is no joke high 90s that looks like a strike all the way and has insane movement. He's just really tough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eventually, he'll try to get ahead in the count with a ball more up in the zone. That's your chance to strike. Obviously easier said than done, but I think at least the first couple batters of the inning need to let the bat sit on their shoulder until two strikes.

I disbelieve that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zone Percentage (pitches in the strike zone / total pitches thrown)

Britton (fastball): 38.9%

Brach (fastball): 55.1%

O'Day (slider): 46.8%

Givens (fastball): 60.2%

I didn't randomly select the pitch types, btw. They're their most thrown pitches.

Fairly interesting how low Britton's zone percentage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...