Jump to content

Tommy Hunter Released by Indians- SIGNS with Orioles to be Eligible for Postseason.


Rene88

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Slightly better than average then if my exact phrasing is really troubling for you.

Isn't the only relevant question whether or not he'd be an upgrade over some other guys on the 25 man roster? Do you think he is not?

Hunter threw 21 low-leverage innings (~0.8 LI) to a roughly average ERA, then got released. If he's better than someone currently on the roster its not by much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hunter threw 21 low-leverage innings (~0.8 LI) to a roughly average ERA, then got released. If he's better than someone currently on the roster its not by much.

I guess if you're judging him and his potential based on the last 21 innings in the majors you might conclude that.

I tend to support looking at a player's entire body of work to get a more meaningful sampling of data to draw conclusions from.

His time with the O's in 2015, 2014, etc is not exactly ancient history.

even the incredible WAR (both flavors) has him above replacement level in those 21 innings!

Would you like to know how many Orioles relievers have been sub-replacement level this year?

We have two on the roster right now, potentially three but it depends on what you classify Ubaldo as.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hunter threw 21 low-leverage innings (~0.8 LI) to a roughly average ERA, then got released. If he's better than someone currently on the roster its not by much.

Question that is not intended to be snarky - could someone offer a brief explanation as to why discussing high versus low leverage innings is kosher but any discussion of "clutch" hitting scoffed at? I know it's not quite apples to apples, but the concept is similar: how does a player do in higher pressure/leverage situations.

Don't mean to derail the thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess if you're judging him and his potential based on the last 21 innings in the majors you might conclude that.

I tend to support looking at a player's entire body of work to get a more meaningful sampling of data to draw conclusions from.

His time with the O's in 2015, 2014, etc is not exactly ancient history.

even the incredible WAR (both flavors) has him above replacement level in those 21 innings!

Would you like to know how many Orioles relievers have been sub-replacement level this year?

We have two on the roster right now, potentially three but it depends on what you classify Ubaldo as.

Hunter's career ERA/FIP/xFIP are 4.29/4.54/4.21. Over 2/3rds of his career value came in 2009-2010. He's a random arm who is likely a fraction of a win different (not necessarily better) from the other random arms at the back of the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question that is not intended to be snarky - could someone offer a brief explanation as to why discussing high versus low leverage innings is kosher but any discussion of "clutch" hitting scoffed at? I know it's not quite apples to apples, but the concept is similar: how does a player do in higher pressure/leverage situations.

Don't mean to derail the thread.

His performance in those situations wasn't my point. It was that the Indians felt his best role was when the game was already more-or-less over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hunter's career ERA/FIP/xFIP are 4.29/4.54/4.21. Over 2/3rds of his career value came in 2009-2010. He's a random arm who is likely a fraction of a win different (not necessarily better) from the other random arms at the back of the roster.

Is he better than Ondrusek, Bridwell, Drake etc? If they think he is then they should sign him. We had to burn Britton 2 night ago because Bridwell wasn't sharp. Can't measure that with WAR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is he better than Ondrusek, Bridwell, Drake etc? If they think he is then they should sign him. We had to burn Britton 2 night ago because Bridwell wasn't sharp. Can't measure that with WAR.

And yet with Britton off last night, it was to the Orioles advantage to have used him two nights ago. Baseball is a funny sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hunter's career ERA/FIP/xFIP are 4.29/4.54/4.21. Over 2/3rds of his career value came in 2009-2010. He's a random arm who is likely a fraction of a win different (not necessarily better) from the other random arms at the back of the roster.

His worst year FIP wise (excluding his debut season which is useless due to SSS) was when he started with us in 2012. 5.75. That was in over 130 innings.

Since then:

'13: 3.69

'14: 3.15

'15: 3.38 (then yes he was bad in Chicago in 15 innings)

'16 with Indians: 3.15

Hunter was primarily a starter in 2012 and earlier, surely you agree that the ballgame changes when you go from SP to RP and that not all those earlier stats are as relevant?

Usually I find it very hard to argue with you Drungo because your arguments are so well versed in data and logic but I have to admit I'm pretty mystified by your inability to see how much he is an upgrade over our current options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet with Britton off last night, it was to the Orioles advantage to have used him two nights ago. Baseball is a funny sport.

Yes it is buy my point is in a pennant race we shouldn't have to being doing that. Buck said something to Gary after the game about the pen needs to be better in those spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is he better than Ondrusek, Bridwell, Drake etc? If they think he is then they should sign him. We had to burn Britton 2 night ago because Bridwell wasn't sharp. Can't measure that with WAR.

Why do you think Hunter is better than those guys? I'd rather have Drake, and probably Ondrusek. If you want to ignore metrics like WAR let's talk about why Hunter was traded for a bag of balls last year, not resigned by the Cubs, signed for a token $2M in February, then released in mid-pennant race by the Indians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T

Why do you think Hunter is better than those guys? I'd rather have Drake, and probably Ondrusek. If you want to ignore metrics like WAR let's talk about why Hunter was traded for a bag of balls last year, not resigned by the Cubs, signed for a token $2M in February, then released in mid-pennant race by the Indians.

What have those guys done to inspire confidence? Drake was awful up here earlier. I don't get the application of WAR to this argument. We aren't comparing a player like Trumbo to a better all around player.

Hunter throws strikes. Half the time these young guys give the other team free passes that gets them back in the game. Hunter will make you swing the bat. He has been in big spots before. Not like we are advocating him over Britton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...