Jump to content

Playing the long game, what's the post-AJ plan for CF?


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

So it occurred to me the other day that I don't recall hearing what the Orioles are planning to do about CF once Jones contract is up in a couple of years. Or maybe even before that, as there's been a lot of whispers (and even some loud chatter) this season about AJ's alleged defensive deficiency in CF (your mileage may vary on how legit any of that is).

So is there a plan to fill this position post-AJ? Are there any prospects within the organization who are at least good defensively at CF? Is Rickard a realistic candidate for CF heir apparent? Are we still holding out hope for Xavier Avery? I doubt we'll replace AJ's offense in CF unless we get super-lucky or make a huge FA splash, but I could live with a Kiermaier type -- plus glove, lots of speed (read: SB and triples).

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
So it occurred to me the other day that I don't recall hearing what the Orioles are planning to do about CF once Jones contract is up in a couple of years. Or maybe even before that, as there's been a lot of whispers (and even some loud chatter) this season about AJ's alleged defensive deficiency in CF (your mileage may vary on how legit any of that is).

So is there a plan to fill this position post-AJ? Are there any prospects within the organization who are at least good defensively at CF? Is Rickard a realistic candidate for CF heir apparent? Are we still holding out hope for Xavier Avery? I doubt we'll replace AJ's offense in CF unless we get super-lucky or make a huge FA splash, but I could live with a Kiermaier type -- plus glove, lots of speed (read: SB and triples).

Thoughts?

Xavier Avery may have been in the conversation five years ago. He's nothing more than an organizational player at this point.

In our system I would look at Austin Hays and Cedric Mullens who will both likely start in Frederick next season. They could be in the picture in two or three years.

Along with Adam Jones, other FA center fielders in 2019 include Andrew McCutcheon, AJ Pollock, Charlie Blackmon, and Leonys Martin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it occurred to me the other day that I don't recall hearing what the Orioles are planning to do about CF once Jones contract is up in a couple of years. Or maybe even before that, as there's been a lot of whispers (and even some loud chatter) this season about AJ's alleged defensive deficiency in CF (your mileage may vary on how legit any of that is).

So is there a plan to fill this position post-AJ? Are there any prospects within the organization who are at least good defensively at CF? Is Rickard a realistic candidate for CF heir apparent? Are we still holding out hope for Xavier Avery? I doubt we'll replace AJ's offense in CF unless we get super-lucky or make a huge FA splash, but I could live with a Kiermaier type -- plus glove, lots of speed (read: SB and triples).

Thoughts?

I don't know. I wouldn't count on Avery or Rickard. I have no idea. Sorry but my thoughts are on this years team. Can't worry what's going to happen two years down the road. There is just too much that could happen between now and then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be fantastic if Hays were ready. I honestly need to research Mullens a bit.

No interest in Martin. Don't think we should pay what it would take for the others. Cutch will be a little old anyway.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam probably gets an extension. Really centerfield is about the last position. You should be worrying about.

Even if he gets extended, at 33 he probably belongs in a corner OF spot. I'd consider moving him there this offseason if we could find a really good defensive CF, but I suspect that won't happen.

I don't think the O's have a long-term plan for CF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if he gets extended, at 33 he probably belongs in a corner OF spot. I'd consider moving him there this offseason if we could find a really good defensive CF, but I suspect that won't happen.

I don't think the O's have a long-term plan for CF.

I agree with you. I would be on board with AJ as our RF next year.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if he gets extended, at 33 he probably belongs in a corner OF spot. I'd consider moving him there this offseason if we could find a really good defensive CF, but I suspect that won't happen.

I don't think the O's have a long-term plan for CF.

Those were sort of two separate thoughts. 1) I think he's here past his current deals expiration and 2) I think he'll play just fine at CF beyond this year at least. Not that he's a lock at CF through 36. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the organization is planning much beyond 2018, or even 2017 for that matter. In addition of CF, my other big concern is SS/3B after JJ. Even if Manny moves to SS that just exposes a hole at 3B. I guess the plan would be to cross that bridge when we get there. It's possible that the replacement for AJ comes from trading AJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I also went with Burnes because of his better durability. Since 2019 Snell has pitched more then 128 innings in a season one time (180 innings in 2023). While Burnes has pitched over 167 inning or more every season since becoming a full time starter in 2021. Burnes is also two years younger so in theory while a six year contract is riskier it would end at the same age as Snell on a four year deal. I'd be happy with either one, but my preference in Burnes.
    • Adding that I would go for Roki over either of them.
    • I'd go for Snell. He has true Cy Young stuff. Burnes is really good but his K rate keeps dropping and the years scare me. The box score for his playoff start was solid but he actually gave up a lot of hard contact. I just don't trust him enough to commit all those years and dollars.
    • I go Burnes because to me the higher floor is very important with this sort of deal. I feel like Snell's skillset is more on a razor's edge-- if you didn't like how Burnes pitched in August, Snell is almost certainly more prone to stretches of poor performance like that. Even if he is more dominant at other times to balance it out. Plus, the extra length of Burnes' deal is offset a bit by being 2 years younger. 
    • Snell is injury prone and Burnes is a tough workhorse.
    • Didn't see the video? The ball went maybe 15 feet before it bounced, it was rolling by the dugout.  It was nothing and the Dodgers look soft. Was he supposed to let the discarded ball stay on the field?
    • Rojas pulled from the bases in the 3rd inning after he couldn't manage 2nd to home on a Mookie single (and Ohtani couldn't 1st to 3rd behind him) as the Dodgers try to dig out of 6-1.    Rojas' limited mobility hurt the Dodgers defense on a Bogaerts ground ball where Merrill was too quick going first to second, and Rojas ended up getting no outs on a routine ground ball. Manny with a cagey zigzag baserunning move during the Padres 6-run inning off Buehler, getting into Freeman's throwing lane to put Buehler into the jam. Teoscar grand slam brings it back to 6-5 in the 3rd inning...get your popcorn ready.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...