Jump to content

Buster Olney: 'No Chance' Orioles Re-Sign Manny Machado


PressBoxOnline

Recommended Posts

This is not that hard.  If the Orioles are 8 to 10 games back with two teams ahead of them at the deadline then Manny should be dealt.  Looking at who could be contending and their needs I think that means it's either the Yankees (Torres+) or Houston (Martes, Tucker, etc.)  If the Orioles are in it, go for it and trade him in the off-season.  

The one thing you cannot see happen is letting Manny walk for nothing.  If that happens you got a see a lot people fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, LookitsPuck said:

Well, duh.

Wish the O's took the Evan Longoria approach. But they rarely sign their young players to long term extensions early enough. Adam Jones really is the only standout. 

Jones had over 5 years of service when he signed.  I'd prefer to see us locking up players much earlier than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, weams said:

I was relatively certain that this would be Manny;s last year as an O. 

I hope so.  I love the guy but simply allowing him to walk in FA will cripple the franchise.  He needs to be traded for a massive return.  Unfortunately I don't trust DD to do that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

I hope so.  I love the guy but simply allowing him to walk in FA will cripple the franchise.  He needs to be traded for a massive return.  Unfortunately I don't trust DD to do that. 

I don't trust PA to allow DD to do it at the most advantageous moment.  I think DD would be happy to do it and would do it quite well if given the opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 24fps said:

I don't trust PA to allow DD to do it at the most advantageous moment.  I think DD would be happy to do it and would do it quite well if given the opportunity.

I disagree.  DD only cares to win now.  He has no regard for the future because he won't be here.  I could see him holding onto Manny through next season and letting him walk.  In fact, I expect it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manny just seems disinterested of late. i think the blown leads have gotten him down or he's allowing his poor start to drag him down. I know he'll be better, but if he doesn't give any indication that he wants to stay then you have to trade him after next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

I disagree.  DD only cares to win now.  He has no regard for the future because he won't be here.  I could see him holding onto Manny through next season and letting him walk.  In fact, I expect it. 

DD's personal motives may be exactly what you assume they are although I don't see that as particularly meaningful.  Speculation has Manny's next contract worth slightly under half the value of the entire Orioles franchise.  Ownership may have an opinion under the circumstances.  

I also believe that Manny will walk at the end of 2018 but it will be because Buck will lobby and ownership will choose to maximize the current window until the last possible moment.  I think it will be a significant opportunity missed that will be felt over at least two seasons if not more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't listened to the interview, but based on the article, it does not seem that Olney has any inside information on this, he's just stating his opinion.     I think his opinion is probably correct, but it's not based on any facts we don't already know.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Manny just seems disinterested of late. i think the blown leads have gotten him down or he's allowing his poor start to drag him down. I know he'll be better, but if he doesn't give any indication that he wants to stay then you have to trade him after next season.

Noticed at the game Sunday,he was bored or something. Then his bud Schoop also looked bored. I know he will wake up against the  Red Sox and go on from there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still believe that we can trade Manny right now and contend, provided we make the RIGHT deal.   We need to get some Major League talent back now that's in the higher levels of a team with a good farm system.

The bigger question is, which team would be willing to deal for Manny?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, clapdiddy said:

I still believe that we can trade Manny right now and contend, provided we make the RIGHT deal.   We need to get some Major League talent back now that's in the higher levels of a team with a good farm system.

The bigger question is, which team would be willing to deal for Manny?

Red Sox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Manny just seems disinterested of late. i think the blown leads have gotten him down or he's allowing his poor start to drag him down. I know he'll be better, but if he doesn't give any indication that he wants to stay then you have to trade him after next season.

Soon it will be leaked that Manny has had a "nagging" injury all year... and we'll have a reason for why he is hitting .220 and among the league leaders for errors by a 3B.

It's just amazing... remember Manny looked fast and was stealing bases a couple years ago, now it's hard to discern him from Hardy... although to be fair to Manny he never actually runs hard enough to see if he has any speed left

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...