Jump to content

Do We Sell?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, crawjo said:

For me, the argument against extending Machado has less to do with Machado than the rest of the team. If you put $300 million (or more) into Machado, how are you going to build and maintain a winning team around him? We don't have the young players coming up. The farm system is very weak. We trade Machado not because he won't be worth the money but because we need to find a way back to contention, and I don't see how we can do that without acquiring prospects (and probably finishing in last for a couple years in a row so we can get some really high draft picks). 

I agree. I think if and when we trade Machado has more to do with how Gausman, Tillman, Bundy pitch than anything else. We aren't buying premier starting pitching any time soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Of course we try to sell.... but there isn't much left

We should try to get some value back for Machado, Schoop, Brach, Bundy, Gausman and Britton

We should move Jones, Davis, O'day, and Trumbo but they would all just be salary dumps... we wouldn't get anything of value back but perhaps get some desperate team to share a small portion of their salaries.

We should play 2018 and 2019 will payrolls well under 100 million and be okay with losing 100+ games

Folks have still not figured out how complete the DD devastation of this franchise is.

It will be 3 to 5 years with a great FO before this team is again competitive.

Sad thing is it didn't have to be this way.

Trade Jim Johnson in 2013, Chris Davis and Darren O'day after 2015 season, and Britton last winter and never sign JJ Hardy... and assuming we did just okay on those trades and we'd be running away with the AL East here in 2017

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TradeAngelos said:

When was the last time this team "sold" anything? 

2011.    And they sold many times from 2000-11.     Clark, Surhoff, Timlin, Bordick, Ponson, Tejada, Bedard, Huff, Uehara.      It didn't take 14 years for Angelos to agree to rebuild.     It took 12 years for a rebuild to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

2011.    And they sold many times from 2000-11.     Clark, Surhoff, Timlin, Bordick, Ponson, Tejada, Bedard, Huff, Uehara.      It didn't take 14 years for Angelos to agree to rebuild.     It took 12 years for a rebuild to work.

Yep it would take 3 to 5 year for a good FO to get the O's back to competiveness. If we hire our normal GM's or say turn the team over to Brady Anderson, we could easily have a decade or more of losing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

2011.    And they sold many times from 2000-11.     Clark, Surhoff, Timlin, Bordick, Ponson, Tejada, Bedard, Huff, Uehara.      It didn't take 14 years for Angelos to agree to rebuild.     It took 12 years for a rebuild to work.

People rag on our developmental system all the time. Rightfully so.  So why is everyone in a hurry to rebuild?  You think we're going to get back a guy that has Kevin Gausman's stuff?  We can't even turn him into a 4 ERA SP.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

People rag on our developmental system all the time. Rightfully so.  So why is everyone in a hurry to rebuild?  You think we're going to get back a guy that has Kevin Gausman's stuff?  We can't even turn him into a 4 ERA SP.  

You act like he sucked the last 3 years?  Name me the pitchers NYY and Boston have developed in recent years? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Frobby said:

2011.    And they sold many times from 2000-11.     Clark, Surhoff, Timlin, Bordick, Ponson, Tejada, Bedard, Huff, Uehara.      It didn't take 14 years for Angelos to agree to rebuild.     It took 12 years for a rebuild to work.

I think if Syd Thrift had never been GM the O's would have rebounded sooner.  His tenure set back the Orioles for years, he should have been on a golf course instead of running an MLB franchise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I think if Syd Thrift had never been GM the O's would have rebounded sooner.  His tenure set back the Orioles for years, he should have been on a golf course instead of running an MLB franchise. 

It was an awful decision by PA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

You act like he sucked the last 3 years?  Name me the pitchers NYY and Boston have developed in recent years? 

You're out of touch.  

New York

  • Luis Servino(23)- 75.1 IP, 2.51 ERA
  • Jordan Montgomery(24)- 63.1 IP, 3.55 ERA

Boston

  • Eduardo Rodriguez
  • Steven Wright 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I think if Syd Thrift had never been GM the O's would have rebounded sooner.  His tenure set back the Orioles for years, he should have been on a golf course instead of running an MLB franchise. 

Nobody else wanted the job.  That's why we had to hire a GM that had basically been blackballed in the MLB.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

You're out of touch.  

New York

  • Luis Servino(23)- 75.1 IP, 2.51 ERA
  • Jordan Montgomery(24)- 63.1 IP, 3.55 ERA

Boston

  • Eduardo Rodriguez
  • Steven Wright 

One not even half year of Severino and Montgomery??

If Boston gets credit for ERod they  the Orioles do for Tillman. 

Wright the knuckleballer? Please. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

People rag on our developmental system all the time. Rightfully so.  So why is everyone in a hurry to rebuild?  You think we're going to get back a guy that has Kevin Gausman's stuff?  We can't even turn him into a 4 ERA SP.  

What's the alternative to a rebuild at this point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...