Jump to content

Do We Sell?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

One not even half year of Severino and Montgomery??

If Boston gets credit for ERod they  the Orioles do for Tillman. 

Wright the knuckleballer? Please. 

They're 23 and 24.  What do you want them to be?  10 year vets?  EdRod had a 5 ERA in Bowie for us, came up with them that season and pitched well.  I think they helped him.  Wright was an AS.  

We developed Tillman.  Of course.  I'm not 12.  

We aren't some small market payroll team.  Heck, we're up there with the big boys now.  You can afford a David Price or Sale if you aren't spending 12 million a year on Ubaldo and Gallardo.  Heck, you might have a farm system to trade for Sale if you aren't giving away 1st rd picks for Ubaldo, Gallardo, and then attaching first round picks to Webb, Norris and Matusz.  That's 5 first round picks that were given away for nothing.  We could have used the 5 first round talents to trade for an Ace like Sale.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I think if Syd Thrift had never been GM the O's would have rebounded sooner.  His tenure set back the Orioles for years, he should have been on a golf course instead of running an MLB franchise. 

I think it was Gary Dell'Abate's fault. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Nobody else wanted the job.  That's why we had to hire a GM that had basically been blackballed in the MLB.  

That is true, but in that case think outside the box and hire a young up and comer.  Of course the Orioles in 2000 were not of this mindset.

I liked the Duquette hiring at the time, he did good work in Montreal and Boston.  He was hungry to show he was still capable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you truly want to sell and rebuild I'm afraid that first means that Duquette and Buck need to go unless they plan to stay for the long haul. You cannot let Duquette make all the trades, acquire the players he likes then have him walk out after 2018 and leave the rebuild up to the new GM with a bunch of traded for talent he had no part in acquiring. With that said, I'd probably let 2017 play out unless something drastic happens and they're 10 back or something. Let Britton reestablish value, let Machado find himself, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

They're 23 and 24.  What do you want them to be?  10 year vets?  EdRod had a 5 ERA in Bowie for us, came up with them that season and pitched well.  I think they helped him.  Wright was an AS.  

We developed Tillman.  Of course.  I'm not 12.  

We aren't some small market payroll team.  Heck, we're up there with the big boys now.  You can afford a David Price or Sale if you aren't spending 12 million a year on Ubaldo and Gallardo.  Heck, you might have a farm system to trade for Sale if you aren't giving away 1st rd picks for Ubaldo, Gallardo, and then attaching first round picks to Webb, Norris and Matusz.  That's 5 first round picks that were given away for nothing.  We could have used the 5 first round talents to trade for an Ace like Sale.  

They haven't been good for an entire year yet is the point. Gausman was above average the last 3 years. Bundy counts, Tillman. Wright was a one year wonder. 

 

This owner is never paying for an ace regardless of how much money they blow elsewhere. It isn't happening. 

Mistakes were made no question, the owner limiting the GM does not help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't help but look at our roster right now and only wonder what we could get back for each player.  Like if we traded Machado, Davis, Trumbo, Jones, Gausman, Tillman...

Some of those are buy low candidates but that's ok.  

I think we'd be sitting pretty if we traded all of those guys for prospects.  Try to acquire as many as we can and sort it out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key pieces in terms of making trades are Machado and some of the relief pitchers (Britton if he is healthy by July, Brach). Machado is having a down year so far but I doubt it has hurt his trade value that much. Everyone in baseball knows what he can do, and how young he is. You should be able to get quite a haul of prospects for him if you find the right offer. 

Personally I would not trade Bundy. You can build the rotation around him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, birdwatcher55 said:

 if Duquette was in charge of a rebuild. It would be catastrophic.

Agree and I don't think you want Buck leading a bunch of young unproven players either

Buck would start Hardy over the second coming of A-Rod if he had them both on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, birdwatcher55 said:

I would move Bundy in a heartbeat if we got three Major League ready prospects.

Unfortunately all of MLB has seen the low 90's, low K rate Bundy. Maybe 1 ML ready prospect, and 2 low A guys with real potential?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...