Jump to content

Manny


brooksfrankjim

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

I don't think you will ever see it. He's a good player having a down year but not a superstar in my opinion.

He'll be lucky to be a good player unless he shows more patience and gets that swing corrected.

A long, loopy uppercut. No doubt he is great defensively but there are times he gets nonchalant with the glove.

I'm leaning toward moving him for the right package of players but I doubt that will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, ORIOLE33 said:

Harper has had a weird career. He's had 3 average seasons. One bad season. And 2 MVP type seasons. 

Manny's been more steady, but has yet to have that phenomenal season.

Yeah but his average seasons were more cause of age then anything.  His first season he was just 19-21.  So he was playing in majors when age wise he should have been in A ball or AA.  The numbers he put up at 19 I would say was a good season because of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also willing to bet that this thread isn't started and these comments about Manny aren't made if this team is 12 games over .500 and leading the AL East.

Great player + having a bad season + mediocre team = whining and complaining and people seeing what they want to see when it comes to lack of hustle, effort, etc.

Great player + having a bad season + winning team = everyone's happy and no one cares who's having a bad season because the team is doing well, more patience for someone who is having a bad year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There certainly are some concerns about his hustle and habits at times, and his baserunning is still really questionable at times.

But the big secret in baseball is, sometimes good players have bad years.  Dallas Keuchel is one of the best pitchers in the game, and he had a very mediocre year last year.  And of course there are hundreds of other examples.  It's just how baseball works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's like people talking smack about Eddie Murray back in the mid 80s.  

Eddie Murray never had a season nearly as bad as Manny is this year

Please stop comparing Manny to HOF'ers. He isn't even a top 10 third baseman in 2017

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Eddie Murray never had a season nearly as bad as Manny is this year

Please stop comparing Manny to HOF'ers. He isn't even a top 10 third baseman in 2017

Well, that does it.  Wraps it all up.  Shows over, folks.  Book has been written about Manny Machado.  One bad season and he can never get better.  

Hey, I know.  A better comp would have been  like talking about Cal Ripken in 1990.  THERE.  I bet if the OH existed in 1990 there'd be a bunch of Dundalkers with mullets and tank tops talking about how we can't have a SS hitting .240 and that the team isn't as good as it was in 1989 because of him.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

I don't think you will ever see it. He's a good player having a down year but not a superstar in my opinion.

Depends how you define superstar, I guess.   He was 5th in the AL position players in WAR in 2013 and 2015 and 7th last year.   I can't say I necessarily expect him ever to do better than that, but that's pretty damned good, and if you do it frequently enough, you're a superstar in my book.   Obviously, he has not played like a superstar in 2017.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's like people talking smack about Eddie Murray back in the mid 80s.  

I gave you rep for this and I have stood up for Manny in other threads, but the data goes both ways. People get frustrated that some fans have anointed Manny as a HOF'er already, but he's had a HOF type start to his career. Not many players are 24 and have been the top 10 MVP voting three times (top five twice). So there's lots of data saying that Manny is a very, very special player. But there's also data suggesting that Manny is very immature, very hot headed, and might struggle controlling emotions. Manny may have a nagging injury that really explains his poor hitting this year, but his past behavior does open the door for questions about him and how he might respond when things are not going his way. A lot of the Manny hating is way, way over the top, but I think Manny's past behavior should and will be included when teams think about investing in a 10 year or more contract with Manny...and his past behavior makes it reasonable to question his ability to handle things when they don't go his way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

So there's lots of data saying that Manny is a very, very special player. But there's also data suggesting that Manny is very immature, very hot headed, and might struggle controlling emotions. Manny may have a nagging injury that really explains his poor hitting this year, but his past behavior does open the door for questions about him and how he might respond when things are not going his way. 

I tend to think a lot of that stuff is overblown.    People have high expectations for Manny, so when he disappoints them they tend to manufacture reasons relating to his attitude or whatever.     Players aren't metronomes, and sometimes they have disappointing seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

I gave you rep for this and I have stood up for Manny in other threads, but the data goes both ways. People get frustrated that some fans have anointed Manny as a HOF'er already, but he's had a HOF type start to his career. Not many players are 24 and have been the top 10 MVP voting three times (top five twice). So there's lots of data saying that Manny is a very, very special player. But there's also data suggesting that Manny is very immature, very hot headed, and might struggle controlling emotions. Manny may have a nagging injury that really explains his poor hitting this year, but his past behavior does open the door for questions about him and how he might respond when things are not going his way. A lot of the Manny hating is way, way over the top, but I think Manny's past behavior should and will be included when teams think about investing in a 10 year or more contract with Manny...and his past behavior makes it reasonable to question his ability to handle things when they don't go his way. 

Yup, I agree.

I'm assuming the people on here who get up in arms about immaturity and controlling emotions were making amazing life decisions at age 20-24.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Frobby said:

, I tend to think a lot of that stuff is overblown.    People have high expectations for Manny, so when he disappoints them they tend to manufacture reasons relating to his attitude or whatever.     Players aren't metronomes, and sometimes they have disappointing seasons.

Cal and Eddie never "threw" a bat at a pitcher. I think it's fair to question Manny's maturity and professionalism based on known behavior, not innuendo and such. If Manny was a Blue Jay, Yankee or Red Sox I think we would see Manny very differently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yup, I agree.

I'm assuming the people on here who get up in arms about immaturity and controlling emotions were making amazing life decisions at age 20-24.

And I'm sure many here paid the consequences. And I think an organization can ask for very high standards when investing many millions in a person. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manny is indeed a great player. You know it when you see it. His WAR when he's healthy backs it up.

I am utterly confused about his approach this year. It's true that he is just giving away at bats waaaaay too frequently. He did this a little bit last year too, but it is more noticeable this year because he's hitting .220. I keep waiting for him to snap out of it. I'm expecting a big second half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Cal and Eddie never "threw" a bat at a pitcher. I think it's fair to question Manny's maturity and professionalism based on known behavior, not innuendo and such. If Manny was a Blue Jay, Yankee or Red Sox I think we would see Manny very differently. 

I'm simply disputing that there's a connection between Manny's current offensive struggles and any immaturity or attitude issues.    I'm not condoning or excusing Manny's bat-throwing incident or his questionable decision to charge Yordano Ventura when he plunked Manny last year.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...