Jump to content

Giavotella Recalled


Lucky_13

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

No, he played there for an inning last night.  

Doesn't mean he won't get an extended look there for a few games.  

We don't have a lot to lose by going with a 3B Machado-SS Schoop-2B Giovatella arrangement at this point.  It will certainly be better offensively and Schoop's ability to play on the left side of the infield could be important in another year or two with Manny gone.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Schoop have more range at SS than Hardy at this point?

Schoop is so bulky and seemingly inflexible...I can't imagine this working.  

But at this point, who cares.  Might as well see if he could fill there for Hardy next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The days of people saying that Janish is a good glove at SS is over.  He's going to catch the ball right at him but nothing else.  Below average arm.  

Tejeda should get to more balls than he does.  Looks like he doesn't get good reads off the bat.  Weak arm.  

Schoop is a MLB'r.  He's got a cannon and soft hands.  Plus he's got good baseball instincts.  It's worth a try.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LC_O's_87 said:

Does Schoop have more range at SS than Hardy at this point?

Schoop is so bulky and seemingly inflexible...I can't imagine this working.  

But at this point, who cares.  Might as well see if he could fill there for Hardy next season.

He is certainly faster than Hardy.  I'm not sure whether that translates into more range in the IF.  I would expect Schoop to be below average, but passable at SS.  Similar to what he is at 2B.  He has more than enough arm for the position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ChuckS said:

Doesn't mean he won't get an extended look there for a few games.  

We don't have a lot to lose by going with a 3B Machado-SS Schoop-2B Giovatella arrangement at this point.  It will certainly be better offensively and Schoop's ability to play on the left side of the infield could be important in another year or two with Manny gone.  

So much for Buck being a big proponent of great defense. So you have a mediocre outfield defense. Giavotella is an average second baseman at best with a weak arm. Schoop does not have great range. We shall see if Buck tries this defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like the O's must be seriously considering that the drop-off in SS defense if they moved Schoop there might be offset by the offensive boost that Giavotella would provide...at least in late innings or specific games or situations. Otherwise it seems like a weird move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck has an offense that is not scoring.   And it hasn't for quite a while now.   He is in desperation mode.   Hardy range is still per good.  I would expect Schoop to be less at SS.   And Giavotella's range is probably less than Schoop's at 2B.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giavotella is a journeyman stopgap; I doubt the O's would seriously experiment with Schoop to SS just for the sake of Giavotella.  

If they seriously experiment with Schoop at SS, they would be doing it with a mind towards switching Ryan Mountcastle or maybe even Chance Sisco to 2B.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Why is Gio on the roster?  Could this be Buck and DD differing?  Buck is playing Tejada and Janish at SS, maybe DD wants to mix it up. Don't know why we need all three.  

Possible Krod situation??????

DFA'ed Janish. Gio has been hitting the ball extremely well in Norfolk (a whole lot better than Washington was when he got called up).

After Buck called out Tejada the other day in Milwaukee for hit bad hitting, this was the next step.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Orioles are doing this to see if Schoop can be a viable SS, in preparation for next year, then I can see the reasoning behind it. I don't think it'll work -- Schoop probably doesn't have the range for SS -- but maybe it's worth a try since the O's will need a SS.

But if the Orioles are doing this solely to get Giavotella into the lineup instead of Tejada, it makes no sense. In their careers, Tejada is just as good a hitter if not better than him. Giavotella has a bit better SLG, but Tejada has the better OBP. And Tejada is two years younger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...