Jump to content

POLL: Yay or nay on Beckham trade?


PaulFolk

POLL: Do you like the Tim Beckham trade?  

133 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the Tim Beckham trade?

    • Yes. Beckham is under control through 2020 and could be the SS of the future.
      92
    • No. We should be acquiring prospects, not trading them away.
      24
    • Meh. Nothing lost, nothing gained.
      17

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Just now, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Worst case scenario opening day lineup has Beckham at SS, Davis 1B, Mancini LF and Trumbo RF.  

I'm a pretty big Mancini believer, but when you put it that way...

Tonight's game was truly painful to watch.  I now find myself in a really strange place.  I kinda want to see another few games like this during the rest of the season, simply to prevent any possible excuse for not making wholesale changes during the offseason with defense as a primary consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, 24fps said:

I'm a pretty big Mancini believer, but when you put it that way...

Tonight's game was truly painful to watch.  I now find myself in a really strange place.  I kinda want to see another few games like this during the rest of the season, simply to prevent any possible excuse for not making wholesale changes during the offseason with defense as a primary consideration.

I like Mancini at 1B or DH.  Outfield not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 24fps said:

I'm a pretty big Mancini believer, but when you put it that way...

Tonight's game was truly painful to watch.  I now find myself in a really strange place.  I kinda want to see another few games like this during the rest of the season, simply to prevent any possible excuse for not making wholesale changes during the offseason with defense as a primary consideration.

I think they know how bad things are. Some of the solutions are not ready or even in the organization. Mullins is one answer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

There is no way in hell he is the starting SS next year. 

Well ok then.  Obviously there's a whole offseason to go but if they don't get anyone for SS....who else is gonna play short?

I think you're confused, I wasn't advocating for it.  Looking at it from a logical perspective, it could happen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well ok then.  Obviously there's a whole offseason to go but if they don't get anyone for SS....who else is gonna play short?

I think you're confused, I wasn't advocating for it.  Looking at it from a logical perspective, it could happen.  

They will go outside the organization. I said Iglesias back months ago. Obviously if other teams want him they don’t control whether they get him. I just think instead of giving Beckham a raise they will spend some money and try with someone else. 

I was actually all for the trade, I thought it made sense to add a SS with years of control. I mean they had him under control for 3.5 years and he isn’t making much. He just seems to have a knack for making bad plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may have already been said tonight. Joe Angel said Beckham had a nightmarish night. He manages to make every kind of mistake at SS you can conceive of plus ones you can hardly describe.  He must have a vision problem. I am serious about this.  There is no way he can continue to make mistakes at SS game after game. I don't think he sees the ball properly.  It's not fair to our pitchers for him to continue to go out there game after game and make mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't remember him being this bad...or bad at all really...on defense last year.  I am not sure what's going on with him.

He wasn't, it's like a non-throwing version of the yips, it's wild. He's always been inconsistent, but this is wild.

Last year he botched 15 out of 350 routine plays at SS.

This year it's 4 out of 49 at SS. (and that doesn't count yesterday). 

Data from inside edge fielding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

2nd error tonight, 12th in 21 games at short. 

This is why the narrative that Manny “demanded” to play SS or that Buck “kowtowed” to him fails. Manny let it be known that he’d prefer to play SS, and Buck judged that he’d be a better SS than Beckham.     Was he wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't remember him being this bad...or bad at all really...on defense last year.  I am not sure what's going on with him.

He wasn’t this bad, but he was bad. The writing was on the wall, but his Superman month at the plate blurred it a bit. But it was there. I was really frustrated with his defense last year and thought he would be bad this year. He has the yips or whatever now on top of just regular bad. I predict he reverts to just regular bad pretty soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't remember him being this bad...or bad at all really...on defense last year.  I am not sure what's going on with him.

There is a reason Tampa dumped him when he has a decent bat.  You can't have a guy play THIS bad in the field and continue running him out there, even if he was hitting like he was when we first got him last year.  Perhaps he has regressed to his Tampa days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Dipper9 said:

There is a reason Tampa dumped him when he has a decent bat.  You can't have a guy play THIS bad in the field and continue running him out there, even if he was hitting like he was when we first got him last year.  Perhaps he has regressed to his Tampa days?

You can definitely keep running him out there in a season like this, now there needs to be better play to put him out there next year when they have pitching prospects like Akin, Tate, Ortiz, and maybe Harvey making their debuts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
    • I think of it differently.   I think keeping the  top 4 prospects in Holliday, Kjerstad, Mayo and Basallo  will influence who the O's add.   These 4 are keepers to build around for the next 6 years.   They will help keep the payroll low while providing improving performance. A year ago the O's had a surplus of position players in the top levels of the organization.    Elias decided to trade Joey Ortiz,  Norby, Stowers, Hovath, Etzel and Billy Cook to fill holes.    This thined out the prospects at the higher levels.   So I don't see the top four being traded for many years.   They will become part of the O's core players at the major league level IMO.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...