Jump to content

my draft vs the JJ's draft. How will they do 3 years from today?


Recommended Posts

I "picked" Smoak, Ladendorf, and Melville.

JJ chose Matusz, Avery, Hoes.

I'll try to remember I did this 3 years from now, and see who's draft is fairing better.

With the high school guys . . . you are going to have to give it 5 years. 3 years is a decent, but not great assessment period for college type guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I "picked" Smoak, Ladendorf, and Melville.

JJ chose Matusz, Avery, Hoes.

I'll try to remember I did this 3 years from now, and see who's draft is fairing better.

You'll find out part of your answer by 8/15. By then, the HSers will have either signed or committed to college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I "picked" Smoak, Ladendorf, and Melville.

JJ chose Matusz, Avery, Hoes.

I'll try to remember I did this 3 years from now, and see who's draft is fairing better.

My problem with this type of think is that Ladendorf and Melville are guys that you read about in BA or another similar mag or website. You've probably never seen them play, nor have you seen Avery or Hoes. Jordan's scouts, and Jordan himself in some cases (probably all of these higher picks) have watched all of them intensely and the local kid plays for the Orioles showcase amateur team coached by one of their scouts, Dean Albany. They probably have a much better feel for these guys.

But, we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My problem with this type of think is that Ladendorf and Melville are guys that you read about in BA or another similar mag or website. You've probably never seen them play, nor have you seen Avery or Hoes. Jordan's scouts, and Jordan himself in some cases (probably all of these higher picks) have watched all of them intensely and the local kid plays for the Orioles showcase amateur team coached by one of their scouts, Dean Albany. They probably have a much better feel for these guys.

But, we'll see.

Well that and Melville fell for obvious signability reasons. Everyone in baseball knew Melville was good, but if you don't sign him it doesn't matter. Hell, every top college guy was drafted at least once before. Pedro Alvarez (Boston, 14th round), Justin Smoak (Oakland, 16th round), Brian Matusz (Angels, 4th round), and Buster Posey (Angels, 50th round) all got drafted before. But they didn't sign, which was key.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This draft, if I remember the name right, was a DeMacio draft more so than anything Jordan has ever done before. We took "Toolsy" players comparable to Darnell MacDonald and Keith Reid, who if all the stars align may be great but are more likely to never see the majors because they have too many things to work on. I would bet that the only pick in the first five rounds that ever sees the majors is Matusz, and he will be with another team after we trade him and either Tillman or Arietta for hitting.

People have been talking about faith in Jordan and McPhail. Fiath in Jordan has been built over a few years; this is McPhail's first draft. While I don't have any inside sources, I'm betting Jordan resigns within the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to believe it's a given to just blow through slot recommendations.

The scenario in the original post could be $1M higher than slot. This is a nice strategy on paper, but unrealistic for a majority of major league teams, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Maybe John Means could masquerade as a healthy Chayce McDermott. https://www.milb.com/player/chayce-mcdermott-694646
    • I’m not sure trading for an impact starter is best use of resources. We still have six starters at the MLB level in Burnes, Bradish, GRod, Irvin, Kremer, and Suarez. Then Povich looks like he deserves a shot if needed.    Burnes, Bradish, GRod are the obvious playoff trio.    further injuries would change things, obviously, but at the moment I don’t see a clear need (and would have to pay handsomely for an upgrade). If someone would want Kremer as a part of the package, then maybe it makes sense. 
    • When Kremer comes back you have Burnes, Bradish, GRod, Kremer, Irvin Suarez in the bullpen.  Povich and McDermott at Norfolk. Absent further injury I don’t see Elias doing what it would probably take for Luzardo.  The relievers like Scott, Harvey, etc. will be cheaper.        
    • The basic story Elias told about Corbin Burnes is that Orioles strategic interest was communicated early in the offseason, and Matt Arnold took a long time (beyond even Milwaukee's successful recruitment of Rhys Hoskins) to decide which path to take. Indefinitely, Mike Elias' basic job is to know the availability and acquisition cost of any of the world's best pitchers, especially relievers as it would be awfully tough to unseat the top 3 starters that are really all the tournament asks of a pitching staff from that role. I don't think we will see the big move until near the deadline because the GM's of some teams playing .501 baseball also want all the mid-July information they can get, and they generally have better relievers than the .375 clubs. Jesus Luzardo would answer a 2025 question but quickly create a 2024 one if him or Grayson Rodriguez is going into the bullpen, a tricky ask Elias might prefer to veer away from. If Suarez/Kremer are really wobbly, the Joe Saunders-Erick Fedde kind of guy would be uncertain for the tournament roster.
    • Not specific to sliders, but if you toggle between 2023 and 2024, you can see his chase rate and whiff rate are significantly improved  https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/jorge-mateo-622761?stats=statcast-r-hitting-mlb
    • I updated my post above after realizing I missed their trade suggestion: Bradfield, Povich, and Norby.  I think their proposal is too short on our end.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...