Jump to content

What does no announcement of a Buck extension mean?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Maybe if you offer to pay Dan's contract for the next year then Peter to hire someone new.

I don’t know what Duquette’s salary is, but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to his impact on how his $170 mm+ budget (payroll and other things) should be spent.    

But it’s academic.   I was talking about what I would do, not what I think Angelos will do.   If Angelos were going to fire Duquette, it would have happened already.   The GM meetings start on Monday.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don’t know what Duquette’s salary is, but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to his impact on how his $170 mm+ budget (payroll and other things) should be spent.    

But it’s academic.   I was talking about what I would do, not what I think Angelos will do.   If Angelos were going to fire Duquette, it would have happened already.   The GM meetings start on Monday.   

Peter doesn't fire GMs.  He just doesn't re-hire them.   I was talking about after the 2018 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Peter doesn't fire GMs.  He just doesn't re-hire them.   I was talking about after the 2018 season.

He fired Wren, but basically, you’re right.    He doesn’t often fire managers, either.    I actually like that about him, but I think there are times to make exceptions.    I’d favor making a decision on Duquette now, rather than next year, simply because there’s a conflict between Dan’s incentive to succeed in the short run and the team’s interest in succeeding in the longer run, that’s exacerbated by the fact that we have several very key players on expiring contracts.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Andy was president of Baseball Operations with the O's..  Dan hasn't even reach that level yet.

I personally think Andy held that title only because Flanny held the title Executive Vice President and Angelos didn’t want to embarrass Flanny by firing him, so he gave Andy a higher title.    There seems to be zero functional difference between Andy’s job responsibilities and Duquette’s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

He fired Wren, but basically, you’re right.    He doesn’t often fire managers, either.    I actually like that about him, but I think there are times to make exceptions.    I’d favor making a decision on Duquette now, rather than next year, simply because there’s a conflict between Dan’s incentive to succeed in the short run and the team’s interest in succeeding in the longer run, that’s exacerbated by the fact that we have several very key players on expiring contracts.   

But Dan's short term thinking may align with Peters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I personally think Andy held that title only because Flanny held the title Executive Vice President and Angelos didn’t want to embarrass Flanny by firing him, so he gave Andy a higher title.    There seems to be zero functional difference between Andy’s job responsibilities and Duquette’s.

I think the title denotes the pay level.  And Dan is all around getting to the next pay level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I think the title denotes the pay level.  And Dan is all around getting to the next pay level.

And you think that based on what? Do you have any idea what any GM of the Orioles has made?

Edit: per Cot’s, Duquette makes about $2 mm/yr, Buck makes $3.5 mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

And you think that based on what? Do you have any idea what any GM of the Orioles has made?

Don't know where I read it  (Roch) .but I thought there was a hint of a behind the scenes agreement for a Buck. 

Ive always assumed he was staying one way or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Frobby said:

And you think that based on what? Do you have any idea what any GM of the Orioles has made?

Edit: per Cot’s, Duquette makes about $2 mm/yr, Buck makes $3.5 mm.

By comparison

Managers

Scioscia  6m  on a 10/50m contract.

Girardi just finished a 4/16 contract

Maddon 5/25

Presidents

Epstein  5/18.5m

Friedman 5/35m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

By comparison

Managers

Scioscia  6m  on a 10/50m contract.

Girardi just finished a 4/16 contract

Maddon 5/25

Presidents

Epstein  5/18.5m

Friedman 5/35m

So do you think any of that is relevant to what Andy MacPhail was paid as President of Baseball Operations for the Orioles?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, foxfield said:

Well, I cannot imagine a GM worth having that would accept that set up. Why would you?  If it is successful, it's not yours...if it fails you are held responsible. Plus in fairness, while we have had that type of relationship, we have moved closer to a normal situation with AM and DD.  Even PA knows he needs a GM...he has to.  Ok.  I tried.  

Maybe every fan that buys a season ticket package can be GM for a day.  

I wouldn't like that setup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • He'll go back to pulling pitches and hit 30 HRs there.
    • I tend to agree with this.  We certainly aren't the best farm system any more and it's time to use Uncle Dave's money some.  I'm in favor of buying the pitching we need.  There are some good FA arms out there.  If there's a bat on another team they want to trade for that's different since the FA position player list isn't good.
    • This what I think happens too.  We'll trade from the FV 40ish tier not the 45 or higher tier.  And I can see dealing from the top ofthe deck (i.e. Mounty, Urias, Kremer*...) to build the ceiling of the pipeljne or weaker/thinner positions.  *A Kremer based deal would be predicated on an FA SP signing.  I don't see it happening but it's an interesting case study.
    • Maybe he should be a free agent target this offseason. 
    • Hays hit .354 / .404 / .537 against LH pitching this season. I would absolutely take him back as a platoon player who can fill in all three OF positions. Given the number of southpaws other teams throw against us we'd be nuts not to consider signing him if he gets DFA'd. 
    • I went and checked how we compared to other playoff teams in platooning and pinch-hitting during the playoffs.  I used the first two wildcard games as the sample to keep it apples to apples with the Orioles’ experience.  For the 8 wildcard teams, I counted the number of line-up changes from game 1 to game 2 and the number of pinch hit PAs and added them together.  For lineup changes, I didn’t consider batting order or positions, only the number of hitters that started game 1 but didn’t start game 2 (only McCann for the Orioles). The Orioles were middle of the pack - 4th highest moves among the 8 wildcard teams. #       Team                Lineup changes Pinch hits PAs Total        T1 Tigers 3 5 8            T1 Astros 1 7 8 3 Mets 1 6 7 4 Orioles 1 5 6 5 Royals 1 4 5 6 Braves 1 2 3 7 Brewers 1 1 2 8 Padres 0 0 0 For some additional context, only the Orioles and Tigers faced different-handed starters the first two games AND had opposing pitcher handedness change at least 5 times in those games. Teams that faced same-hand starter both days: Royals Astros Mets Braves   Number times opposing pitcher handedness changed in game: Astros - 8 Royals - 8 Orioles - 5 Tigers - 5 Mets - 4 Padres - 3 Braves - 2 Brewers - 1 
    • If Hays is non tendered he will be looking for the team that will play him full time.     And he might find it.   He in not even 30 yet.   But the O's don't have that to offer him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...