Jump to content

Pantient Rebuilt - Aggressive Reload


Redskins Rick

Recommended Posts

I’m a big fan of an aggressive reload.....for 2019.

Trade Manny, Britton, Brach.

Offload Trumbo’s contract if feasible, extend Schoop, Gausman.

Don't worry about winning in 2018, get Hays, Santander, and Stewart playing time.  Let Mullins develop maybe sign Dyson in case Mullins doesn’t pan out, Dyson could be a great 4th OF in 2019 if Mullins is in CF.

Sign Chatwood for 3/4 years to help stabilize the rotation. Draft Burch Smith, sign Fiers, let them and Ynoa, Hess, and Ramirez (listing them because they are on the 40, I like Means and Long better than Hess and Ramirez) fight for the 4th and 5th spot.

If possible trade for Prado and Straily (or Urena) from Marlins. Prado can play 3B.  If you can’t get Prado, draft Nate Orf and let him compete with Dosch and Wilkerson to be a stopgap at that position.

Sign Tommy Hunter and possibly Nicasio to round out the bullpen, trade them at the deadline if they overachieve.

If you can’t move Trumbo then trade Mancini for young pitching.

These moves would leave the Orioles with a solid controllable core and plenty of payroll room in 2019 to try and compete.

Beckham, Sisco, Schoop, Gausman, Bundy, Hays, any of Stewart, Santander and Mullins who pan out, Mancini or the young starter he is flipped for, Givens.

Also, in 2019 you have the possibility of Akin, Harvey, and Mountcastle ready to help.

None of this includes anything the team might get in the Manny, Britton, and Brach trades.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Orioles attendance has still not rebounded to what it was a couple of years before MacPhail started growing the arms and signing Garrett Atkins. The Orioles were lucky in that the Nationals also sucked during the MacPhail years. Today they are a powerhouse and outdraw the O's every season. There is no way this team does a full rebuild and gives the Nats more of its fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

With the Yankees and Red Sox in this division and other WC-type teams a lot closer to competing than we are, I vote for a rebuild.   I realize that is not likely to happen based on Buck's and DD's statuses.  I'm prepared for about an 82-win team in 2018 and total uncertainty after this season.

Our votes are like the proverbial trees falling in the proverbial forest: there's nobody there to listen.

From all indications, the overall strategy for the team's direction has been and will be determined by one person. He's 88 years old. He's owned the team for 24 years and has never made it to the World Series. For much of that time, his team and he have been laughed at by those who have failed to recognize his intellectual prowess and moral superiority to other MLB owners. He intensely dislikes the Commissioner and the MLB establishment, and in all probability recognizes that they euchered him in the MASN deal. I don't expect him to give up even the slimmest chance at a World Series appearance and a victory parade, with his middle finger raised at least metaphorically to the baseball world, in favor of a rebuild for 2018. 

It's his team. It doesn't matter what we think. It matters very little, if at all, what Dan and Buck think. (And it may be that one or both of them have successfully lobbied against trading away top prospects over the last couple of years.)

There's only one vote that counts. I would like to see it cast for a rebuild, but I can't come up with a reason to believe that will happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Our votes are like the proverbial trees falling in the proverbial forest: there's nobody there to listen.

From all indications, the overall strategy for the team's direction has been and will be determined by one person. He's 88 years old. He's owned the team for 24 years and has never made it to the World Series. For much of that time, his team and he have been laughed at by those who have failed to recognize his intellectual prowess and moral superiority to other MLB owners. He intensely dislikes the Commissioner and the MLB establishment, and in all probability recognizes that they euchered him in the MASN deal. I don't expect him to give up even the slimmest chance at a World Series appearance and a victory parade, with his middle finger raised at least metaphorically to the baseball world, in favor of a rebuild for 2018. 

It's his team. It doesn't matter what we think. It matters very little, if at all, what Dan and Buck think. (And it may be that one or both of them have successfully lobbied against trading away top prospects over the last couple of years.)

There's only one vote that counts. I would like to see it cast for a rebuild, but I can't come up with a reason to believe that will happen. 

There is a lot to be said for disliking the commissioner and the MLB establishment, they are clueless and a bunch of clowns.

Its been a quite while since this team was the laughingstock of the baseball world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

There is a lot to be said for disliking the commissioner and the MLB establishment, they are clueless and a bunch of clowns.

Its been a quite while since this team was the laughingstock of the baseball world.

I agree with you. The first point is not relevant to the point I was trying to make. As to the second, I could argue with you -- Angelos has continued to be the subject of ridicule and derision, even if "laughingstock" is a little strong. But I included it because I believe from everything I've read that the decade-plus of putdowns has not been forgotten and that it reinforces Angelos' desperate desire to have his moment in the sun (the sun, not The Sun).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, spiritof66 said:

I agree with you. The first point is not relevant to the point I was trying to make. As to the second, I could argue with you -- Angelos has continued to be the subject of ridicule and derision, even if "laughingstock" is a little strong. But I included it because I believe from everything I've read that the decade-plus of putdowns has not been forgotten and that it reinforces Angelos' desperate desire to have his moment in the sun (the sun, not The Sun).  

Unlike Syd and his cronies, DD is a real and respected baseball man in the industry and I believe would have no problem landing a job elsewhere, if he so desired.

For the most part, the past several years, we have seen winning baseball here and meaningful games in September and that all anybody can ask, because this silly game we all love, is a game of inches and health.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Unlike Syd and his cronies, DD is a real and respected baseball man in the industry and I believe would have no problem landing a job elsewhere, if he so desired.

For the most part, the past several years, we have seen winning baseball here and meaningful games in September and that all anybody can ask, because this silly game we all love, is a game of inches and health.

 

How long was he out of baseball the last time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 24fps said:

Because he's a professional and an employee.  If the person who pays his salary wants him to rebuild then he does it to the best of his ability.  It's really that simple.  If he doesn't have specific guidance for 2018, undoubtly he has overall guidelines.  Something like "put the most competitive team possible on the field every year within the established budget."  That's probably the default and a lot of people don't think a rebuild is indicated, so I suspect it's business as usual anyway.  

I think the notion that Dan has the flexibility to operate in his own self-interest has been grossly exaggerated around here.  Even if he were somehow to do so, it would probably be noticed and impact his future employment opportunities elsewhere.   That's a significant disincentive.  He's a businessman with a lot of responsibility, not a cowboy.

A good read from a good poster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, clapdiddy said:

With the Yankees and Red Sox in this division and other WC-type teams a lot closer to competing than we are, I vote for a rebuild.   I realize that is not likely to happen based on Buck's and DD's statuses.  I'm prepared for about an 82-win team in 2018 and total uncertainty after this season.

82 wins is 6 wins from the playoffs. Or more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...