Jump to content

Who’s our GM & Manager Next Year?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Natty said:

I don't understand all the praise for DD. We are struggling to even play .300 baseball. We have some of the most disasterous contracts in baseball. We desperately needed pitching after last year. We got Cobb and Cashner. I've already heard the argument about too many chefs in the kitchen. What has DD done that was good for the club recently that helped us win? I don't get it.

And me either, I just do not understand. I want a new regime. Time to turn the page, get a whole new outlook on life, both in the front office and on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 314
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It goes against my fandom, as I love Buck and know he was a major reason for our turnaround this decade, but I voted for a clean slate across the board.  Buck had essentially the same core he's had during the playoff run to start this season, plus better starting pitching with the additions of Cobb and Cashner, and yet the team completely collapsed.  How does an entire team, except for Jones and Manny, all slump simultaneously and to this degree?  Gotta clean slate the entire coaching staff.

At the same time, out minor league development is pretty bad by all accounts, and Duquette didn't do much to address the OBP weakness of this team, proactively approach the expiring contract players, and countless other miscues.  So it could be he was hamstrung by ownership, but I don't buy it that Peter cared that much who the minor league coaches, scouts, etc. are (though I admit I could be very wrong there).

In any event, I voted for a clean slate, as I think that's best for the long term success is to move on and move forward, but that said, I won't be disappointed if one or both stay.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering that Dan Duquette has yet to be signed to an extension, there is a real possibility that the O's will be seeking a new Executive Vice President, Baseball Operations ("GM" for short :P ).  Therefore it seems like a good time to review some potential replacement candidates.  The following is taken from an MLB.com article regarding the Mets' GM search and covers some candidates we may eventually consider:

Jared Porter, Assistant GM, D-backs
As part of the Theo Epstein tree that has produced a wealth of front-office talent, Porter has been a part of four World Series championship clubs with the Red Sox and Cubs. Porter joined Diamondbacks GM Mike Hazen (another Epstein disciple) in Arizona in November 2016, taking over as the D-backs' senior vice president and assistant GM. Porter is well-respected among scouts, coaches and player development folks, his experience in several areas making him an ideal GM candidate.
 

Chaim Bloom, Senior Vice President of Baseball Operations, Rays
A finalist for GM openings in Milwaukee and Philadelphia, Bloom has established a stellar reputation during his 13-year run with Tampa Bay. When Andrew Friedman left for Los Angeles in 2014, Bloom was promoted to the Rays' VP of baseball operations, adding the senior VP title in '16. Erik Neander holds the GM title, though the duo works in concert when it comes to the club. For Bloom, the opportunity to run his own team -- especially a big-market club in close proximity to his native Philly -- would be an interesting possibility.
 

Tim Naehring, VP of Baseball Operations, Yankees
One of Brian Cashman's most trusted lieutenants, Naehring has developed a reputation as one of the best talent evaluators in the game. The former Red Sox infielder would join Jerry Dipoto as the only former big league players in a GM position, though it remains to be seen whether Naehring would even be interested in leaving the Bronx after spending more than a decade working for Cashman.
 

Ben Cherington, VP of Baseball Operations, Blue Jays
The former Red Sox GM has been connected to other jobs, namely the Braves' opening last fall. Cherington has been serving as the Blue Jays' VP of baseball operations for the past two years, and while he seems satisfied in his role, a move back to the GM chair can't be ruled out. Cherington was the GM for Boston's 2013 World Series championship club, but he left after Dave Dombrowski was hired as president of baseball operations.
 

Jason McLeod, SVP of Player Development/Scouting, Cubs
Yet another Epstein disciple, McLeod has been part of the Cubs' brain trust since November 2011 as the club's senior VP of player development and amateur scouting. McLeod has been considered a future GM for a few years, though he signed an extension with the Cubs that runs through 2021. During his time in Chicago, he's overseen the selection of first-rounders Albert Almora Jr., Kris Bryant and Kyle Schwarber in consecutive years.
 

Josh Byrnes, SVP of Baseball Operations, Dodgers
The former D-backs and Padres GM nearly landed the Mets' gig in 2010, finishing as the runner-up to Alderson. Byrnes, the Dodgers' senior VP of baseball operations for the past four years, was Epstein's assistant GM from 2003-05, helping the Red Sox break their 86-year curse. He's been a candidate for other GM jobs in recent years, including the Angels gig that went to Billy Eppler in late 2015.

-end-
 

I'm particularly high on McLeod and Porter, and was surprised to see the Astros' Mike Elias omitted from the article.  However, feel free to discuss anyone that interests you, even if they're not among those listed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duquette may have been retained for next year (and possibly beyond), but they won't make any announcements about DD or Buck until after the season. Making public that Duquette has been retained without saying anything about Buck would pretty much say everything about Buck. The same would be true the other way around.

We'll just have to wait a few months before we know anything about the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe we need to find someone with a small market background.  Someone used to working on a light budget and doing more with less.  The large market teams have been used to outspending the rest of the league - particularly just recently for international talent.

That said, I am fine giving DD the time to build out an international scouting presence and then evaluate where we are as an organization. There is a lot I didn't like about DD, but I also think the organization could benefit from some stability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Duquette may have been retained for next year (and possibly beyond), but they won't make any announcements about DD or Buck until after the season. Making public that Duquette has been retained without saying anything about Buck would pretty much say everything about Buck. The same would be true the other way around.

We'll just have to wait a few months before we know anything about the future.

You're right, but why does it really matter if they spill the beans about who will be back? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 99ct said:

You're right, but why does it really matter if they spill the beans about who will be back? 

Because it would be an embarrassment to the one not being brought back. It would be a lousy thing to do, to show up an employee like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/19/2018 at 11:13 AM, mdbdotcom said:

Duquette may have been retained for next year (and possibly beyond), but they won't make any announcements about DD or Buck until after the season. Making public that Duquette has been retained without saying anything about Buck would pretty much say everything about Buck. The same would be true the other way around.

We'll just have to wait a few months before we know anything about the future.

Agree, I would bet on DD being back and buck being gone. Buck served the Os well, his time is done. DD is just now showing his full potential. At this point in time, I would give DD a three year contract and if he felt that he needed his title changed to grab pooba than whatever but your role is the same. You could even pay him another $1 a year for all I care. But I really don’t see them bringing in a new gm in the next 2 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Greg Pappas said:

To all: Outside of a potential Duquette return, are there any candidates that you'd feel good about hiring?

I'm going mostly on what you've presented here as I don't know the FOs of baseball very well at all.  I think I would be most interested in Josh Byrnes.  He has experience knowing how the big boys operate (BOS, LAD, MFYs of the world), and how smaller teams (Padres, ARI) have to operate.  We need this, given that we are not a large market at all, but play against the 2 biggest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/19/2018 at 12:13 PM, mdbdotcom said:

Duquette may have been retained for next year (and possibly beyond), but they won't make any announcements about DD or Buck until after the season. Making public that Duquette has been retained without saying anything about Buck would pretty much say everything about Buck. The same would be true the other way around.

We'll just have to wait a few months before we know anything about the future.

A few more months of Buck is making me crazier than ever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, gmelson26 said:

I'm going mostly on what you've presented here as I don't know the FOs of baseball very well at all.  I think I would be most interested in Josh Byrnes.  He has experience knowing how the big boys operate (BOS, LAD, MFYs of the world), and how smaller teams (Padres, ARI) have to operate.  We need this, given that we are not a large market at all, but play against the 2 biggest. 

Anyone of them listed would be a good pick for the O's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The earliest 2025 NFBC results exist, and slotted him about the 30th best AL starter for 2025 alone's expected statistical production.    Eflin and all five guys in Tampa's forecast rotation (Baz, McClanahan, Pepiot, Bradley, Springs) fell around that level. That assumes free agents Burnes, Snell, Flaherty, Kikuchi, Pivetta, Fried and Manaea fall about half into the AL. He'll start Opening Day, but it is a byproduct of the disappointing beginning to Grayson's career and Bradish's current injury. I think odds are pretty low he is a 2026 Oriole.
    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...