Jump to content

Which team was better, 79 or 83


Canson80

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
26 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

'83, because Cal was better than Kiko Garcia.

That’s pretty succinct, but I’ll say the ‘79 team was probably equally good because all the other key players were 4 years younger.   Look how quickly the team deteriorated after ‘83.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That '83 squad, as I remember, had to rely on a mid-August surge to take the pennant that year. And it was a last gasp of a long dynasty. The '79 team was more prime, as Frobby points out, closer to the peak of that last era of excellence, 77-78-79-80-81-82-83. You could argue the 100-win second-place 1980 O's were the best of the bunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

'83, because Cal was better than Kiko Garcia.

Doug Decines was better than whomever played third on 83 team.  I think Glenn Gulliver was third baseman second half of 82.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atomic said:

Doug Decines was better than whomever played third on 83 team.  I think Glenn Gulliver was third baseman second half of 82.  

 

 

Todd Cruz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...