Jump to content

Kakes (Markakis) 2nd on OF All Star Voting in NL


Rene88

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Raffy was eligible for the Hall, he just didn’t get the votes due to his association with PED’s.

I’d like to know, during the all star era, what is the minimum number of all star games for which any inductee was selected.

Blyleven has 2 all stars.   Yount had 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, bpilktree67 said:

Blyleven has 2 all stars.   Yount had 3.

It’s pretty surprising to me that Yount was only a three-time all star.    The guy had eight seasons at 4.9 rWAR or higher.    He also won the MVP in 1989 without having been named to the all star team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s pretty surprising to me that Yount was only a three-time all star.    The guy had eight seasons at 4.9 rWAR or higher.    He also won the MVP in 1989 without having been named to the all star team.  

Ripken seemingly buried everyone else at short from '84 and onward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, bpilktree67 said:

If he gets to 3000 hits he is in discussion.  No player eligble is not in the hall.  Though he might not get to that.  However no player also with 600+  doubles who is eligble for the hall is not in it.    So saying a guy that could possibly make both of those lists and not be in discussion is absurd.

About as absurd as saying he's going to play until he's 40 and sniff 3,000 hits. I'm happy for Nick's resurgence this year, but these are not HOF numbers. 

ear Age Tm Lg G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS OPS+ TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB Pos Awards
2006 22 BAL AL 147 542 491 72 143 25 2 16 62 2 0 43 72 .291 .351 .448 .799 106 220 15 3 3 2 3 *97/8D RoY-6
2007 23 BAL AL 161 710 637 97 191 43 3 23 112 18 6 61 112 .300 .362 .485 .848 121 309 22 5 1 6 5 *9  
2008 24 BAL AL 157 697 595 106 182 48 1 20 87 10 7 99 113 .306 .406 .491 .897 136 292 10 2 0 1 7 *9  
2009 25 BAL AL 161 711 642 94 188 45 2 18 101 6 2 56 98 .293 .347 .453 .801 108 291 12 3 0 10 0 *9  
2010 26 BAL AL 160 709 629 79 187 45 3 12 60 7 2 73 93 .297 .370 .436 .805 120 274 18 2 0 5 9 *9/D  
2011 27 BAL AL 160 716 641 72 182 31 1 15 73 12 3 62 75 .284 .351 .406 .756 106 260 16 7 0 6 6 *9/3D GG
2012 28 BAL AL 104 471 420 59 125 28 3 13 54 1 1 42 51 .298 .363 .471 .834 126 198 11 4 0 5 3 9/D  
2013 29 BAL AL 160 700 634 89 172 24 0 10 59 1 2 55 76 .271 .329 .356 .685 88 226 17 3 0 8 3 *9/D  
2014 30 BAL AL 155 710 642 81 177 27 1 14 50 4 2 62 84 .276 .342 .386 .729 104 248 10 4 0 2 4 *9/D3 GG
2015 31 ATL NL 156 686 612 73 181 38 1 3 53 2 1 70 83 .296 .370 .376 .746 109 230 17 3 0 1 11 *9/D  
2016 32 ATL NL 158 684 599 67 161 38 0 13 89 0 2 71 101 .269 .346 .397 .744 100 238 16 5 0 9 9 *9/D3  
2017 33 ATL NL 160 670 593 76 163 39 1 8 76 0 2 68 110 .275 .354 .384 .738 96 228 16 6 0 3 8 *9/D  
2018 34 ATL NL 65 291 260 41 85 19 0 8 43 1 1 28 28 .327 .388 .492 .881 141 128 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Well, if he got to 3,000 hits, there would be a discussion about it.    But I still think he wouldn’t get in.   

I think Nick probably could reach 3,000 if teams continued to play him 155+ games every year, as they have.    But my guess is that if his power slips back to the range it was from 2013-17, teams won’t give him that kind of playing time as he ages.   This year has been great for his career and may earn him a nice 2-year deal, but I think teams are going to be careful with signing him to anything longer than that.   

He already had his playing time threatened this year. Luckily Tucker cooled off before they called up Acuna. That's the rub. He's not going to continue to play everyday. My comment was more directed at how easily someone said he was going to play regularly until he was 40. Like it wasn't a stretch...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

About as absurd as saying he's going to play until he's 40 and sniff 3,000 hits. I'm happy for Nick's resurgence this year, but these are not HOF numbers. 

ear Age Tm Lg G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS OPS+ TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB Pos Awards
2006 22 BAL AL 147 542 491 72 143 25 2 16 62 2 0 43 72 .291 .351 .448 .799 106 220 15 3 3 2 3 *97/8D RoY-6
2007 23 BAL AL 161 710 637 97 191 43 3 23 112 18 6 61 112 .300 .362 .485 .848 121 309 22 5 1 6 5 *9  
2008 24 BAL AL 157 697 595 106 182 48 1 20 87 10 7 99 113 .306 .406 .491 .897 136 292 10 2 0 1 7 *9  
2009 25 BAL AL 161 711 642 94 188 45 2 18 101 6 2 56 98 .293 .347 .453 .801 108 291 12 3 0 10 0 *9  
2010 26 BAL AL 160 709 629 79 187 45 3 12 60 7 2 73 93 .297 .370 .436 .805 120 274 18 2 0 5 9 *9/D  
2011 27 BAL AL 160 716 641 72 182 31 1 15 73 12 3 62 75 .284 .351 .406 .756 106 260 16 7 0 6 6 *9/3D GG
2012 28 BAL AL 104 471 420 59 125 28 3 13 54 1 1 42 51 .298 .363 .471 .834 126 198 11 4 0 5 3 9/D  
2013 29 BAL AL 160 700 634 89 172 24 0 10 59 1 2 55 76 .271 .329 .356 .685 88 226 17 3 0 8 3 *9/D  
2014 30 BAL AL 155 710 642 81 177 27 1 14 50 4 2 62 84 .276 .342 .386 .729 104 248 10 4 0 2 4 *9/D3 GG
2015 31 ATL NL 156 686 612 73 181 38 1 3 53 2 1 70 83 .296 .370 .376 .746 109 230 17 3 0 1 11 *9/D  
2016 32 ATL NL 158 684 599 67 161 38 0 13 89 0 2 71 101 .269 .346 .397 .744 100 238 16 5 0 9 9 *9/D3  
2017 33 ATL NL 160 670 593 76 163 39 1 8 76 0 2 68 110 .275 .354 .384 .738 96 228 16 6 0 3 8 *9/D  
2018 34 ATL NL 65 291 260 41 85 19 0 8 43 1 1 28 28 .327 .388 .492 .881 141 128 10

To be fair, at some point in the history of baseball they without a doubt would have been.  The last 25 years has changed what qualifies for a hall of fame worthy offensively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knowing what a homebody Nick is, I'm pretty sure Atlanta will want him until Pache is ready, and be able to retain him - the only question is contract length.  It'd be an upset for them to make the playoffs this year, but probably not going forward.  Even if he makes 3000 hits, I think he'll more likely become the exception that proves the rule, but he may have an opportunity to make the gray area grayer sometime in the next 2-3 Octobers.  It worked for Jack Morris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Good for Markakis, I hope he makes the All-Star team and the postseason.  Did he ever make the postseason with the O's.  I thought he was injured in 2012.

2014.  Batted leadoff every game, hit homer as I can recall.  To my ears, he got the loudest ovation of anyone not named Buck or Jones during player intro's before the ALDS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

You would need a lot of help.

Thankfully the internet exists and if you can get the idea to take fire, it can happen.

Good luck, I'd like to see it happen just to see if he would refuse.

I think a local radio station in Florida is / was trying to do the same thing with Lewis Brinson. I guess they're still peeved Jeter traded Yelich. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Babypowder said:

As I stated, they didn't do a great job of replacing him. Those are separate issues.

No, they really are not separate issues.   Cost savings as a strategy is Angelos through and through.  It was Mike Mussina part deux.     Your strategy would be fine if the next step was to take the identified spending savings and reinvest them in bettering the position vacated by the lifetime Oriole who had just participated in a major way to leading us to our first division championship in years.    But, if you think that is the way this decision was made, then we just disagree.    They were dumb not to go the extra year and dumber trying to fill the position.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

They got really unlucky with their corner OF choices in 2015.   Every single one underperformed both their 2014 numbers and their career numbers.    To put the cherry on top, De Aza had a .636 OPS for us and then an .809 OPS after he was traded away in June, and then Parra dropped from .886 to .625 after we acquired him at the trade deadline.   Anything that could go wrong, did go wrong with that group.  

And Travis Snider's excuse?   Or making our defense in right completely porous by throwing Trumbo out there....or Delmon Young?  for God's sake.    Whose brilliant baseball mind came up with these choices?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tntoriole said:

And Travis Snider's excuse?   Or making our defense in right completely porous by throwing Trumbo out there....or Delmon Young?  for God's sake.  Or Nolan Reimold?  Or Colby Rasmus? etc. etc.     Whose brilliant baseball mind came up with these choices?  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tntoriole said:

And Travis Snider's excuse?   Or making our defense in right completely porous by throwing Trumbo out there....or Delmon Young?  for God's sake.    Whose brilliant baseball mind came up with these choices?  

I already made the point.

Snider: .716 career OPS going into 2015, .776 in 2014.    Was at .663 for the O’s in 2015.

Young: .742 career OPS going into 2015, .779 in 2014.    Was at .628 for the O’s in 2015.

Similar story for every single corner OF they used in 2015.     When you roll six dice, you don’t expect to roll six one’s.    That’s essentially what happened.     I’m not saying it was a spectacular group, but the O’s rightly should have expected them to do better.   Probably 60-70 OPS points better, as a group, than they did.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...