Jump to content

Who will get a better contract this winter, Markakis or Jones?


Frobby

Who will get a better contract this winter, Markakis or Jones?  

108 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will get the better contract this winter?



Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Prayin4Reign said:

Man...I like Adam and I want to see him do well, but as sincere as Adam's commitment to those things might be...that was more about control than anything else.  Plain and simple.

He was upset about the reality that the Orioles weren't going to bring him back.  He in turn didn't want to help the franchise; whether that be cutting salary for the rest of the season or the benefit of getting a fringe prospect in return.  And he was entitled to that as a 10/5 guy. 

I wouldn't be surprised at all if he goes to San Diego.  He's basically going to go to whatever franchise he feels is going to offer him the best opportunity to get ABs, make an impact as a veteran presence.  Maybe Philadelphia, Milwaukee?  I wish him the best.   

I think San Diego is a possibility. I don't think it really fits with what they should be doing, but neither did the Eric Hosmer move last offseason. They seem to do really well building a farm system, but their actions on the Major League roster have often been headscratchers.

I don't see Milwaukee as an option. They're already loaded in the outfield with Yelich, Cain, Braun, Thames, Santana and Broxton. They won't be able to offer him the ABs to entice him to go there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's remarkable how similar they are at this point. Average of OPS+ last three years: Jones 103.33, Markakis 103.67. Average WAR last three years: Jones 1.4, Markakis 1.67. Markakis is probably a little better defensively (Adam didn't play enough RF to make a strong comparison IMO), but Adam is two years younger. If a team were considering both, then it's a coin flip decision and the contracts should look very similar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jon Heyman wrote an article for Fancred Sports today in which both an unnamed expert and he predict the deals that all the free agents will get.

Expert: Jones 3/$37.5, Markakis 2/$22 mm

Heyman: Jones 2/$22 mm, Markakis 2/$25 mm

A few other predictions of note:

Expert: Manny 10/$325 mm, Britton 4/$56 mm, Brach 3/$27 mm

Heyman: Manny 10/$300 mm, Britton 4/$60 mm, Brach 2/$14 mm

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Jon Heyman wrote an article for Fancred Sports today in which both an unnamed expert and he predict the deals that all the free agents will get.

Expert: Jones 3/$37.5, Markakis 2/$22 mm

Heyman: Jones 2/$22 mm, Markakis 2/$25 mm

A few other predictions of note:

Expert: Manny 10/$325 mm, Britton 4/$56 mm, Brach 3/$27 mm

Heyman: Manny 10/$300 mm, Britton 4/$60 mm, Brach 2/$14 mm

 

I'm curious, what were the predictions for Harper (compared to Machado)? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Jon Heyman wrote an article for Fancred Sports today in which both an unnamed expert and he predict the deals that all the free agents will get.

Expert: Jones 3/$37.5, Markakis 2/$22 mm

Heyman: Jones 2/$22 mm, Markakis 2/$25 mm

A few other predictions of note:

Expert: Manny 10/$325 mm, Britton 4/$56 mm, Brach 3/$27 mm

Heyman: Manny 10/$300 mm, Britton 4/$60 mm, Brach 2/$14 mm

 

No way Britton gets a 4 year deal

I think AJ has an inflated view of his worth, so Markakis will get the bigger contract because he will sign early. Jones will be late to sign and I see him getting a one year deal somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Jon Heyman wrote an article for Fancred Sports today in which both an unnamed expert and he predict the deals that all the free agents will get.

Expert: Jones 3/$37.5, Markakis 2/$22 mm

Heyman: Jones 2/$22 mm, Markakis 2/$25 mm

A few other predictions of note:

Expert: Manny 10/$325 mm, Britton 4/$56 mm, Brach 3/$27 mm

Heyman: Manny 10/$300 mm, Britton 4/$60 mm, Brach 2/$14 mm

 

I would be in shock if Jones gets anything close to that. I'm not even sure Jones gets the 2/$22 Heyman suggested without some heavy incentives being reached.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

I would be in shock if Jones gets anything close to that. I'm not even sure Jones gets the 2/$22 Heyman suggested without some heavy incentives being reached.

I tend to agree.   3-4 years ago, an outfielder with Jones' track record might have gotten a deal like that, but the market has shifted a lot in the last couple of offseasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I tend to agree.   3-4 years ago, an outfielder with Jones' track record might have gotten a deal like that, but the market has shifted a lot in the last couple of offseasons.

That's the really the key for me. The analytics are not kind to a guy like Jones going forward. So many teams are using those analytics going forward which is why guys like Cashner and Cobb were still around in March for the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Markakis is #18 on Keith Law's top 50 FA list. 

Jones didn't make the cut.

Here's what he had to say about Nick:

"Not to rain on anyone's parade here, but after a huge start to his season, in the second half Markakis kind of turned back into a pumpkin... He hit .258/.332/.369 after the All-Star break, which looks a lot like his previous five years: .277/.348/.380 overall, never slugging .400 in any of those seasons. He's a below-average regular in right field, and at 35 this year is far more likely to decline than improve. A one-year deal for $6 million-$8 million might be a bit rich given the lack of power, but there is some value in his durability: He has played in 155 or more games in six straight years and 11 of 12."

Edited by Chito
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • At this stage, I don't care how we get in - just get in. As been said on here a zillion times, the playoffs are a crap shoot. As bad as it seems right now - WHY NOT?
    • Oh, I forgot Mountcastle.  He had a 2.2 bWAR season going (1.4 oWAR). And he's effectively been replaced with O'Hearn who is a 1.3 bWAR player (which has been dropping) of which he has a -1.4 dWAR and a 1.8 oWAR. So there's a net negative there, too, going from O'Hearn part time to him FT and losing Mounty's bat. Injuries are a part of any given team, but I don't think it's unfair to say this team would be at 88-89 wins with even half of those guys back. 
    • While agree that taking this year's Santander out of the offense would hurt. This is the only year that he has performed at this level. He's OPS is 37 points higher this year, than his avg. His OBP stinks and he goes cold for fairly long periods. He's had a couple of heaters that have padded his OPS. His career OPS+ is 114 and that is buoyed by this years 132. I am not saying he sucks or is even at a replacement level player. But he is a pretty flawed player who is not likely to repeat this year which has been pretty flawed as well. I like Santander and I think he provides valuable leadership. I just don't see him having the value that it will take to keep him. I also don't think he is the type of player that ages well. 
    • You really should have to finish in first place to make the playoffs. If the divisions were large from back in the day then I could understand having 2nd place teams make it. It was such an accomplishment back then. We can all agree 3rd place teams making it is a joke. 
    • Agree 100%. I had a different thread chatting about The New Guys.  If we look at just the guys that are getting playing time because of injuries/trades/opportunities that are still playing on this team: Austin Slater: 0.4 (0.2 oWAR, 0.1 dWAR) Livan Soto: 0.3 (0.2, 0.1) Emmanuel Rivera: 0.1 (0.4, -0.3) Eloy Jimenez: -0.2 (-0.2, -0.2) Jackson Holliday: -0.3 (-0.1, 0) Coby Mayo: -0.7 (-0.5, -0.2) If we just go off of their oWAR, that's a combined 0.  Zero. Ramon Urias had a 1.6 oWAR this year. Jordan Westburg a 3.4 oWAR. Even Jorge Mateo had a 0.8 oWAR. Those 3 guys would be getting regular to semi-regular playing time. Eloy/Holliday/Mayo wouldn't play and their near -1.0 oWAR would be replaced with guys that had a combined 6 oWAR anywhere from months (Westy, Mateo) to weeks ago (Ramon).
    • You would think it would be closer to 74 with the way they are playing 
    • Elias said it the other day 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...