Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

In the "How Low Can He Go" thread, I predicted his OPS couldn't fall below .450

He's at .454 right now.  Another 0-fer game and he's below that mark.  So lost at the plate.  So unable or unwilling to make adjustments.  So sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, eddie83 said:

Only positive to me is he is so bad he may be gone sooner than later. 

I mean can they bring him back next year after this debacle? 

I don't think they DFA him with 4 more years left.  In a very unlikely scenario, maybe they can convince him to walk away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Oriol3s said:

I don't think they DFA him with 4 more years left.  In a very unlikely scenario, maybe they can convince him to walk away.

It’s his money. I can see him being bought out. Either way I am sick of watching him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barnaby Graves said:

He should play every day until either the Orioles are playing for something or he is blocking someone.

He is blocking someone. Any replacement level player not making $160 mil. Or, the guy currently playing LF for the Orioles. Or, Trumbo. Or, Alvarez. 

Play the best nine/ten available for each game, regardless of salary. Sunk cost is a thing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eddie83 said:

 This will keep getting uglier. At some point even the Orioles will walk away.  

The White Sox didn't give up on Dunn.  The Phillies didn't give up on Howard.  He is here to stay.  I wish they would get rid of the guys who aren't owed 100 million who are stinkin up the joint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Il BuonO said:

He is blocking someone. Any replacement level player not making $160 mil. Or, the guy currently playing LF for the Orioles. Or, Trumbo. Or, Alvarez. 

Play the best nine/ten available for each game, regardless of salary. Sunk cost is a thing.

 

I don't agree with playing the best nine/ten. At this point, all playing time should be prioritized by:

1. Player development at the major league level.

2. Showcasing players for possible trades, hoping to increase value.

Davis is not blocking anyone. As frustrating as it may seem, there are no 1B players on the farm who don't appear to need more time in the minors. 

That said, Davis, with his contract, will never have positive trade value. It is a sunk cost. If a player with potential trade value were to become available via waivers, I would have no problem DFA'ing Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tntoriole said:

Ubaldo says hello.   As long as the old man is alive, Chris Davis will play out his deal. 

Ubaldo was not this bad. He is hitting worse than a pitcher. Ubaldo in relation was Tom Seaver. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If we were to DH Kjerstad instead of O'Hearn it would be an entire starting 10 who had only played for the Orioles in their MLB career.   Wonder when the last time we ever had such a lineup (if ever).
    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...