Jump to content

Would you offer Austin Hays the Scott Kingery deal?


Frobby

Would you offer Austin Hays the Scott Kingery deal?  

71 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you offer Austin Hays the Scott Kingery deal?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 03/28/19 at 16:20

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, interloper said:

134 PA vs 250 PA is quite a lot, no? Do I think Adley will reach 12 homers in the next 116 PA? Yes I do. He may hit 15 by then. The average, probably not. 

I'm as skeptical of Adley's eventual ML bat as anyone, but that's too big of a discrepancy in PA to make the point you're making right now.

Also, it bears repeating that Adley has barely played baseball in two full years. So listing their ages of 23 vs 22 and acting like that's something worth mentioning at all is pretty silly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Even today it's hard to see a .365/.460/.625 line in AA at 22 and not think it's awesome.  It is.  Especially in 2021 when hitting .365 seems like something Ty Cobb used to do eons ago.

But it's a good lesson in not projecting an epic career based on a single minor league season.  Especially in a catcher who might spend half his career recovering from a never-ending series of large and small injuries.

Rutschman should be better, but we'll see... 

That last line was my only point.  I learned my lesson with Matt…Adley is going to have to show me, over the coming years, if he is Johnny Bench or Johnny Flaherty lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

That last line was my only point.  I learned my lesson with Matt…Adley is going to have to show me, over the coming years, if he is Johnny Bench or Johnny Flaherty lol. 

I'm going to go out on a limb and predict AR will at least be better than John Flaherty (25th round draft pick). Nice random pull of a long forgotten baseball player by the way. 

But I'll definitely hold off on comparisons to HOF catchers. Wieters was very good for the Orioles, but got a bad wrap from some fans because he wasn't "Mauer with power" as a hitter.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

Also, it bears repeating that Adley has barely played baseball in two full years. So listing their ages of 23 vs 22 and acting like that's something worth mentioning at all is pretty silly. 

Obviously age is relevant when you talk about a minor league player's performance.   

Obviously it's GREAT to have a catcher at AA with an OPS over 1.000.   I would certainly rather have that than one that is under .700.

You made a lot of assumptions about "what point I was making" and I don't think they were entirely accurate.  I have every hope that Adley will be a perennial All Star catcher that blows past Wieters's career 16 WAR as an Oriole.   

My main point was that paying him 9 figures (at 30M - 35M or more per) seems pretty darn premature at this stage, and that I think our history with Wieters should make us at LEAST cautious enough to want to see him at the MLB level for a BIT before we start having this conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Even today it's hard to see a .365/.460/.625 line in AA at 22 and not think it's awesome.  It is.  Especially in 2021 when hitting .365 seems like something Ty Cobb used to do eons ago.

But it's a good lesson in not projecting an epic career based on a single minor league season.  Especially in a catcher who might spend half his career recovering from a never-ending series of large and small injuries.

Rutschman should be better, but we'll see... 

As relevant to the topic here, I think the issue is a risk analysis.   Obviously, nobody is going to offer Adley a contract today that is equal in value to what he would earn if he just went year by year and achieved the upside we believe he has.    Any contract he’d be offered would be significantly less than that, because it relieves him of the downside risk of either disappointing performance or trajectory-altering injury.   It has to be a deal where the Orioles benefit if he stays healthy and performs as hoped, but they have risk of paying too much if Adley disappoints.    So where is that balance?

To take the low-hanging fruit, I wouldn’t even think twice before offering Adley the Kingery deal, and I’d be astounded if he took that modest of a deal.   As a reminder, the Kingery deal was for 6/$24 mm with options at $13, 14 and 15 mm.    The “disappointing” Wieters made about $23 mm in his pre-FA years, despite having TJ surgery interrupt his Arb 2 season in such a way that he got only a courtesy raise in Arb 3.    The odds that Adley would earn more than that in his pre-FA years are quite high.    And if things went as hoped in his pre-FA years, he’d probably earn something like the $38 mm Posey got in those years, maybe more considering salary inflation in the intervening years.    

So, I think you’d have to go richer than $24 mm in the pre-FA years.   You shouldn’t have to go as high as the $38 mm Posey got.   I’d say $30ish mm is probably about right.    As to the options, I’d say $13/14/15 is a bit light.   There has to be some significant potential reward for the team, though, since they took a pretty big risk on the front end.   Go $14/$16/$18 mm.    

So, 6/$30 mm with options that could take it to 9/$78 mm.   That is pretty fair to both sides, I think.   If Rutschman has a 3 WAR rookie year, you’ll never get him to sign a deal that good, but it’s a reasonable thing for him to do now.   


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I have seen enough video (didn’t see video of Wieters) to tell there are some big differences in things I feel are important.

I’d be interested in Tony’s evaluation.   I know there were some early concerns about his ability to handle high heat.   Not sure if those concerns have been ameliorated over the last month after a relatively slow first 7-10 games.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Frobby said:

As relevant to the topic here, I think the issue is a risk analysis.   Obviously, nobody is going to offer Adley a contract today that is equal in value to what he would earn if he just went year by year and achieved the upside we believe he has.    Any contract he’d be offered would be significantly less than that, because it relieves him of the downside risk of either disappointing performance or trajectory-altering injury.   It has to be a deal where the Orioles benefit if he stays healthy and performs as hoped, but they have risk of paying too much if Adley disappoints.    So where is that balance?

To take the low-hanging fruit, I wouldn’t even think twice before offering Adley the Kingery deal, and I’d be astounded if he took that modest of a deal.   As a reminder, the Kingery deal was for 6/$24 mm with options at $13, 14 and 15 mm.    The “disappointing” Wieters made about $23 mm in his pre-FA years, despite having TJ surgery interrupt his Arb 2 season in such a way that he got only a courtesy raise in Arb 3.    The odds that Adley would earn more than that in his pre-FA years are quite high.    And if things went as hoped in his pre-FA years, he’d probably earn something like the $38 mm Posey got in those years, maybe more considering salary inflation in the intervening years.    

So, I think you’d have to go richer than $24 mm in the pre-FA years.   You shouldn’t have to go as high as the $38 mm Posey got.   I’d say $30ish mm is probably about right.    As to the options, I’d say $13/14/15 is a bit light.   There has to be some significant potential reward for the team, though, since they took a pretty big risk on the front end.   Go $14/$16/$18 mm.    

So, 6/$30 mm with options that could take it to 9/$78 mm.   That is pretty fair to both sides, I think.   If Rutschman has a 3 WAR rookie year, you’ll never get him to sign a deal that good, but it’s a reasonable thing for him to do now.   


 

I don't think the O's or Adley will play the game before they know the rules.  The New CBA should change the rules for when Adley can become a FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Aglets said:

Obviously age is relevant when you talk about a minor league player's performance.   

Obviously it's GREAT to have a catcher at AA with an OPS over 1.000.   I would certainly rather have that than one that is under .700.

You made a lot of assumptions about "what point I was making" and I don't think they were entirely accurate.  I have every hope that Adley will be a perennial All Star catcher that blows past Wieters's career 16 WAR as an Oriole.   

My main point was that paying him 9 figures (at 30M - 35M or more per) seems pretty darn premature at this stage, and that I think our history with Wieters should make us at LEAST cautious enough to want to see him at the MLB level for a BIT before we start having this conversation.

Sure, but maybe not when comparing one player who missed most of a year with mono and then all of a year due to a global pandemic. We have no idea what the effect of not playing that long has had, if any, on Adley. So comparing his 23 yr old season to Wieters' 22 yr old season is kind of pointless in this specific case. 

And again, we're talking about a 115 PA difference at the moment. That's huge. 

I agree we should contain hype levels for Adley, though. Catchers gonna catcher most of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’d be interested in Tony’s evaluation.   I know there were some early concerns about his ability to handle high heat.   Not sure if those concerns have been ameliorated over the last month after a relatively slow first 7-10 games.   

Some early concerns?  We had folks discussing a swing rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 6/9/2021 at 8:32 AM, Aglets said:

Some food for thought while we are pondering giving Adley a blank check before he even sees AAA.

Rutschman (age 23 at AA):   .288/.440/.567/1.008     8 hr, 26 bb, and 26 K's through 134 PA

Some other first round catcher we drafted in 2007 (age 22 at AA):   .365/.460/.625/1.085          12 hr, 38 bb, 29 K's through 250 PA

 

On 6/9/2021 at 3:36 PM, interloper said:

134 PA vs 250 PA is quite a lot, no? Do I think Adley will reach 12 homers in the next 116 PA? Yes I do. He may hit 15 by then. The average, probably not. 

I'm as skeptical of Adley's eventual ML bat as anyone, but that's too big of a discrepancy in PA to make the point you're making right now.

Update on this.   Closing in on 250 PA at AA..... 15 HR looking like a bit of a stretch.  12 is absolutely possible, he has 2-3 games left.

ADLEY - .276/.408/.495/.902 through 239 PA at AA.  11 HR, 40 BB, 36 K's.

 

IMPORTANT CAVEAT:   I do not necessarily believe that if Adley hits worse than Wieters in AA then he is destined to hit worse than Matt also in MLB.  The game has changed some in the last decade plus.   But I do think context is important, I do think we need to manage our expectations.  And I do think we can say now that Adley isn't exactly forcing anyone's hand at this point.  He is playing well overall, and I do hope they bump him up to Norfolk soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather give out 7-8 Scott Kingery deals than one Chris Davis deal

But in all seriousness, Adley is the type of prospect you absolutely offer this kind of deal to. If he fails, you're out what, 30 million over six years? That's not going to cripple the franchise and the upside is MASSIVE

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/9/2021 at 2:02 PM, Sports Guy said:

I have seen enough video (didn’t see video of Wieters) to tell there are some big differences in things I feel are important.

Can you elaborate?  For what it's worth, pre-26 Wieters had probably the fastest release on SB attempts that I've ever seen from a catcher.

 

In terms of athleticism, that's a bit of a nebulous term, but Wieters seemed to show better than expected athleticism from his work behind the plate, while regressing a bit with the bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Hallas said:

Can you elaborate?  For what it's worth, pre-26 Wieters had probably the fastest release on SB attempts that I've ever seen from a catcher.

 

In terms of athleticism, that's a bit of a nebulous term, but Wieters seemed to show better than expected athleticism from his work behind the plate, while regressing a bit with the bat.

Wieters was very robotic and upright in his movements.  Not as much behind the plate but running and things like that.  His swing wasn’t great, he was slow and never appeared to me to be someone who could transition anywhere else on the Diamond and be good.  
 

I felt his athleticism or lack there of would stop him from being the guy people thought he was in the minors.  I was actually very surprised to see him in person and see how underwhelming he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...